These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25476998)

  • 1. Spatial coding of object typical size: evidence for a SNARC-like effect.
    Sellaro R; Treccani B; Job R; Cubelli R
    Psychol Res; 2015 Nov; 79(6):950-62. PubMed ID: 25476998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Compatibility between response position and either object typical size or semantic category: SNARC- and MARC-like effects in primary school children.
    Uccula A; Enna M; Treccani B
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Jan; 189():104682. PubMed ID: 31563710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of parity, physical size, and magnitude in numerical cognition: the SNARC effect revisited.
    Fitousi D; Shaki S; Algom D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jan; 71(1):143-55. PubMed ID: 19304604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. SNARC for numerosities is modulated by comparative instruction (and resembles some non-numerical effects).
    Patro K; Shaki S
    Cogn Process; 2016 May; 17(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 26714804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SNARC effects with numerical and non-numerical symbolic comparative judgments: instructional and cultural dependencies.
    Shaki S; Petrusic WM; Leth-Steensen C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):515-30. PubMed ID: 22288694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The paired-object affordance effect.
    Yoon EY; Humphreys GW; Riddoch MJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Aug; 36(4):812-24. PubMed ID: 20695701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Emotional valence and physical space: limits of interaction.
    de la Vega I; de Filippis M; Lachmair M; Dudschig C; Kaup B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):375-85. PubMed ID: 21928929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the instability and constraints of the interaction between number representation and spatial attention in healthy humans: A concise review of the literature and new experimental evidence.
    Fattorini E; Pinto M; Merola S; D'Onofrio M; Doricchi F
    Prog Brain Res; 2016; 227():223-56. PubMed ID: 27339014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments.
    Bae GY; Choi JM; Cho YS; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1506-21. PubMed ID: 19857020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Influence of typical size of objects in a categorization task].
    Ferrier L; Staudt A; Reilhac G; Jiménez M; Brouillet D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Dec; 61(4):316-21. PubMed ID: 18266507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Drawing and identifying objects in relation to semantic category and handedness.
    Viggiano MP; Vannucci M
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(8):1482-7. PubMed ID: 11931952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The universal SNARC effect: the association between number magnitude and space is amodal.
    Nuerk HC; Wood G; Willmes K
    Exp Psychol; 2005; 52(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 16076066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The SNARC effect: an instance of the Simon effect?
    Mapelli D; Rusconi E; Umiltà C
    Cognition; 2003 Jul; 88(3):B1-10. PubMed ID: 12804817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The SNARC effect in the processing of second-language number words: further evidence for strong lexico-semantic connections.
    De Brauwer J; Duyck W; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Mar; 61(3):444-58. PubMed ID: 17853205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Size and reflection effects in priming: a test of transfer-appropriate processing.
    Srinivas K
    Mem Cognit; 1996 Jul; 24(4):441-52. PubMed ID: 8757493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Grammatical number elicits SNARC and MARC effects as a function of task demands.
    Roettger TB; Domahs F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(6):1231-48. PubMed ID: 25384199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Repetition and the SNARC effect with one- and two-digit numbers.
    Tan S; Dixon P
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2011 Jun; 65(2):84-97. PubMed ID: 21668090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Numbers and space: a computational model of the SNARC effect.
    Gevers W; Verguts T; Reynvoet B; Caessens B; Fias W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):32-44. PubMed ID: 16478324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence of SQUARC and distance effects in a weight comparison task.
    Dalmaso M; Vicovaro M
    Cogn Process; 2019 May; 20(2):163-173. PubMed ID: 30721375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Instructional Dependency of SNARC Effects Reveals Flexibility of the Space-Magnitude Association of Nonsymbolic and Symbolic Magnitudes.
    Lee D; Chun J; Cho S
    Perception; 2016 May; 45(5):552-67. PubMed ID: 27151510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.