These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25476998)

  • 21. Automaticity of access to numerical magnitude and its spatial associations: The role of task and number representation.
    Cleland AA; Bull R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):333-348. PubMed ID: 29708369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Two routes for the processing of verbal numbers: evidence from the SNARC effect.
    Fias W
    Psychol Res; 2001 Nov; 65(4):250-9. PubMed ID: 11789429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Increased spatial salience in the social Simon task: a response-coding account of spatial compatibility effects.
    Dittrich K; Rothe A; Klauer KC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):911-29. PubMed ID: 22528612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Spatial coding of word-initial letters: evidence from a Simon-like task.
    Treccani B; Cubelli R; Della Sala S; Umiltà C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Feb; 15(1):168-73. PubMed ID: 18605498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bad-good constraints on a polarity correspondence account for the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) and markedness association of response codes (MARC) effects.
    Leth-Steensen C; Citta R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):482-94. PubMed ID: 26213330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Automaticity in processing spatial-numerical associations: Evidence from a perceptual orientation judgment task of Arabic digits in frames.
    Yu S; Li B; Zhang M; Gong T; Li X; Li Z; Gao X; Zhang S; Jiang T; Chen C
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0229130. PubMed ID: 32092079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. SNARC meets SPARC in fMRI--Interdependence of compatibility effects depends on semantic content.
    Weis T; Estner B; Krick CM; Reith W; Lachmann T
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Oct; 77():331-8. PubMed ID: 26382748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The influence of semantic processing and response latency on the SNARC effect.
    Didino D; Breil C; Knops A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 May; 196():75-86. PubMed ID: 31004938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mapping the semantic homunculus: a functional and behavioural analysis of overt semantic generation.
    Esopenko C; Borowsky R; Cummine J; Sarty G
    Brain Topogr; 2008 Sep; 21(1):22-35. PubMed ID: 18338245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stimulus-response correspondence in go-nogo and choice tasks: Are reactions altered by the presence of an irrelevant salient object?
    Lien MC; Pedersen L; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2016 Nov; 80(6):912-934. PubMed ID: 26318437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The impact of stimulus-specific practice and task instructions on response congruency effects between tasks.
    Wendt M; Kiesel A
    Psychol Res; 2008 Jul; 72(4):425-32. PubMed ID: 17546462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Embodied markedness of parity? Examining handedness effects on parity judgments.
    Huber S; Klein E; Graf M; Nuerk HC; Moeller K; Willmes K
    Psychol Res; 2015 Nov; 79(6):963-77. PubMed ID: 25394996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Do silhouettes and photographs produce fundamentally different object-based correspondence effects?
    Proctor RW; Lien MC; Thompson L
    Cognition; 2017 Dec; 169():91-101. PubMed ID: 28865287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Selecting object pairs for action: Is the active object always first?
    Laverick R; Wulff M; Honisch JJ; Chua WL; Wing AM; Rotshtein P
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Aug; 233(8):2269-81. PubMed ID: 25929555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of SNARC compatibility on perceptual accuracy: evidence from object substitution masking.
    Huffman G; Pratt J
    Psychol Res; 2016 Jul; 80(4):702-9. PubMed ID: 26067890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Implicit response-irrelevant number information triggers the SNARC effect: evidence using a neural overlap paradigm.
    Mitchell T; Bull R; Cleland AA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(10):1945-61. PubMed ID: 22524699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Semantic processing of crowded stimuli?
    Huckauf A; Knops A; Nuerk HC; Willmes K
    Psychol Res; 2008 Nov; 72(6):648-56. PubMed ID: 18841386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spatial representation of magnitude in gorillas and orangutans.
    Gazes RP; Diamond RFL; Hope JM; Caillaud D; Stoinski TS; Hampton RR
    Cognition; 2017 Nov; 168():312-319. PubMed ID: 28772188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The direction of hemispheric asymmetries for object categorization at different levels of abstraction depends on the task.
    Studer T; Hübner R
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Jul; 67(2):197-211. PubMed ID: 18308442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Word position affects stimulus recognition: evidence for early ERP short-term plastic modulation.
    Spironelli C; Galfano G; Umiltà C; Angrilli A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Dec; 82(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 21924299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.