These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25477798)

  • 1. Low social status decreases the neural salience of unfairness.
    Hu J; Cao Y; Blue PR; Zhou X
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2014; 8():402. PubMed ID: 25477798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Less Expectation, Less Pain: Low Wealth Alleviates Sense of Unfairness.
    Pei G; Jin J; Li T; Fang C
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():571952. PubMed ID: 33995167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Social Comparison Affects Brain Responses to Fairness in Asset Division: An ERP Study with the Ultimatum Game.
    Wu Y; Zhou Y; van Dijk E; Leliveld MC; Zhou X
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2011; 5():131. PubMed ID: 22087088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When Do Low Status Individuals Accept Less? The Interaction between Self- and Other-Status during Resource Distribution.
    Blue PR; Hu J; Wang X; van Dijk E; Zhou X
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1667. PubMed ID: 27826282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The time course of neural responses to social versus non-social unfairness in the ultimatum game.
    Chen M; Zhao Z; Lai H
    Soc Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 14(4):409-419. PubMed ID: 29883547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Proposers' Economic Status Affects Behavioral and Neural Responses to Unfairness.
    Zheng Y; Cheng X; Xu J; Zheng L; Li L; Yang G; Guo X
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():847. PubMed ID: 28611705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The undermining effect of facial attractiveness on brain responses to fairness in the Ultimatum Game: an ERP study.
    Ma Q; Hu Y; Jiang S; Meng L
    Front Neurosci; 2015; 9():77. PubMed ID: 25805967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceived relative social status and cognitive load influence acceptance of unfair offers in the Ultimatum Game.
    Harris A; Young A; Hughson L; Green D; Doan SN; Hughson E; Reed CL
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227717. PubMed ID: 31917806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Social value orientation modulates fairness processing during social decision-making: evidence from behavior and brain potentials.
    Hu X; Mai X
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2021 Jul; 16(7):670-682. PubMed ID: 33769539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Power to Punish Norm Violations Affects the Neural Processes of Fairness-Related Decision Making.
    Cheng X; Zheng L; Li L; Guo X; Wang Q; Lord A; Hu Z; Yang G
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2015; 9():344. PubMed ID: 26696858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hello handsome! Male's facial attractiveness gives rise to female's fairness bias in Ultimatum Game scenarios-An ERP study.
    Ma Q; Qian D; Hu L; Wang L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180459. PubMed ID: 28678888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Beauty affects fairness: facial attractiveness alters neural responses to unfairness in the ultimatum game.
    Pan Y; Jin J; Wan Y; Wu Y; Wang F; Xu S; Zhu L; Xu J; Rao H
    Brain Imaging Behav; 2022 Dec; 16(6):2497-2505. PubMed ID: 35821158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Social status modulates the neural response to unfairness.
    Hu J; Blue PR; Yu H; Gong X; Xiang Y; Jiang C; Zhou X
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 11(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 26141925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Social Support Modulates Neural Responses to Unfairness in the Ultimatum Game.
    Wei C; Zheng L; Che L; Cheng X; Li L; Guo X
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():182. PubMed ID: 29515497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Social exclusion modulates fairness consideration in the ultimatum game: an ERP study.
    Qu C; Wang Y; Huang Y
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():505. PubMed ID: 23986686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Social comparisons differentially affect fair and unfair processing in ultimatum bargaining.
    Li Q; Dai W; Zheng Y; Wang C; Yang Z; Ren Q; Hu K; Liu X
    Neuropsychologia; 2022 Sep; 174():108318. PubMed ID: 35830915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Behavioral and neuronal determinants of negative reciprocity in the ultimatum game.
    Kaltwasser L; Hildebrandt A; Wilhelm O; Sommer W
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 11(10):1608-17. PubMed ID: 27261490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The neural correlate of mid-value offers in ultimatum game.
    Zhong X; Wang R; Huang S; Chen J; Chen H; Qu C
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0220622. PubMed ID: 31430295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Taking it easy when playing ultimatum game with a Down syndrome proposer: Effects on behavior and medial frontal negativity.
    Rêgo GG; Campanhã C; do Egito JHT; Boggio PS
    Soc Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 12(5):530-540. PubMed ID: 27237685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. I am entitled to it! Social power and context modulate disadvantageous inequity aversion.
    Hou Q; Meng L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2022 Nov; 181():150-159. PubMed ID: 36154950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.