These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25479937)

  • 1. Are some QALYs more equal than others?
    van de Wetering EJ; van Exel NJ; Rose JM; Hoefman RJ; Brouwer WB
    Eur J Health Econ; 2016 Mar; 17(2):117-27. PubMed ID: 25479937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Societal Preferences for Interventions with the Same Efficiency: Assessment and Application to Decision Making.
    Shiroiwa T; Saito S; Shimozuma K; Kodama S; Noto S; Fukuda T
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2016 Jun; 14(3):375-85. PubMed ID: 26940671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Choosing vs. allocating: discrete choice experiments and constant-sum paired comparisons for the elicitation of societal preferences.
    Skedgel CD; Wailoo AJ; Akehurst RL
    Health Expect; 2015 Oct; 18(5):1227-40. PubMed ID: 23758539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Survival or Mortality: Does Risk Attribute Framing Influence Decision-Making Behavior in a Discrete Choice Experiment?
    Veldwijk J; Essers BA; Lambooij MS; Dirksen CD; Smit HA; de Wit GA
    Value Health; 2016; 19(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 27021754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Societal preferences for distributive justice in the allocation of health care resources: a latent class discrete choice experiment.
    Skedgel C; Wailoo A; Akehurst R
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Jan; 35(1):94-105. PubMed ID: 25145575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Societal preferences for rheumatoid arthritis treatments: evidence from a discrete choice experiment.
    Harrison M; Marra C; Shojania K; Bansback N
    Rheumatology (Oxford); 2015 Oct; 54(10):1816-25. PubMed ID: 25989956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing Preferences for Disease Profiles: A Discrete Choice Experiment from a US Societal Perspective.
    Johnston KM; Audhya IF; Dunne J; Feeny D; Neumann P; Malone DC; Szabo SM; Gooch KL
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2024 May; 22(3):343-352. PubMed ID: 38253973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Eliciting Societal Preferences for Weighting QALYs for Burden of Illness and End of Life.
    Rowen D; Brazier J; Mukuria C; Keetharuth A; Risa Hole A; Tsuchiya A; Whyte S; Shackley P
    Med Decis Making; 2016 Feb; 36(2):210-22. PubMed ID: 26670663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative analysis of decision maker preferences for equity/efficiency attributes in reimbursement decisions in three European countries.
    Baji P; García-Goñi M; Gulácsi L; Mentzakis E; Paolucci F
    Eur J Health Econ; 2016 Sep; 17(7):791-9. PubMed ID: 26296623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient preferences for treatment of low back pain-a discrete choice experiment.
    Kløjgaard ME; Manniche C; Pedersen LB; Bech M; Søgaard R
    Value Health; 2014 Jun; 17(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 24968999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Valuing QALYs in Relation to Equity Considerations Using a Discrete Choice Experiment.
    van de Wetering L; van Exel J; Bobinac A; Brouwer WB
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2015 Dec; 33(12):1289-300. PubMed ID: 26232199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Public preferences in healthcare resource allocation: A discrete choice experiment in South Korea.
    Bae EY; Lim MK; Lee B; Bae G; Hong J
    Health Policy; 2023 Dec; 138():104932. PubMed ID: 37924559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tailoring chemotherapy supply according to patients' preferences: a quantitative method in colorectal cancer care.
    Rosato R; Di Cuonzo D; Ritorto G; Fanchini L; Bustreo S; Racca P; Pagano E
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2020 Jan; 36(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 31535573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Societal preferences for funding orphan drugs in China: An application of the discrete choice experiment method.
    Tan S; Wang Y; Tang Y; Jiang R; Chen M; Chen H; Yang F
    Front Public Health; 2022; 10():1005453. PubMed ID: 36579068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Social preference weights for treatments in Fabry disease in the UK: a discrete choice experiment.
    Lloyd AJ; Gallop K; Ali S; Hughes D; MacCulloch A
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2017 Jan; 33(1):23-29. PubMed ID: 27590169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preferences regarding antibiotic treatment and the role of antibiotic resistance: A discrete choice experiment.
    Ancillotti M; Eriksson S; Andersson DI; Godskesen T; Nihlén Fahlquist J; Veldwijk J
    Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2020 Dec; 56(6):106198. PubMed ID: 33080314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patient versus neurologist preferences: A discrete choice experiment for antiepileptic drug therapies.
    Ettinger AB; Carter JA; Rajagopalan K
    Epilepsy Behav; 2018 Mar; 80():247-253. PubMed ID: 29433949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mimicking Real-Life Decision Making in Health: Allowing Respondents Time to Think in a Discrete Choice Experiment.
    Veldwijk J; Johansson JV; Donkers B; de Bekker-Grob EW
    Value Health; 2020 Jul; 23(7):945-952. PubMed ID: 32762997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Eliciting preferences for outpatient care experiences in Hungary: A discrete choice experiment with a national representative sample.
    Brito Fernandes Ó; Péntek M; Kringos D; Klazinga N; Gulácsi L; Baji P
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235165. PubMed ID: 32735588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Who should receive treatment? An empirical enquiry into the relationship between societal views and preferences concerning healthcare priority setting.
    Reckers-Droog V; van Exel J; Brouwer W
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0198761. PubMed ID: 29949648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.