These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25480075)

  • 1. Investigation of objective measures for intelligibility prediction of noise-reduced speech for Chinese, Japanese, and English.
    Li J; Xia R; Ying D; Yan Y; Akagi M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Dec; 136(6):3301. PubMed ID: 25480075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modifying the normalized covariance metric measure to account for nonlinear distortions introduced by noise-reduction algorithms.
    Chen F; Hu Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL405-11. PubMed ID: 23656101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative intelligibility investigation of single-channel noise-reduction algorithms for Chinese, Japanese, and English.
    Li J; Yang L; Zhang J; Yan Y; Hu Y; Akagi M; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3291-301. PubMed ID: 21568430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of noise suppression on intelligibility. II: An attempt to validate physical metrics.
    Hilkhuysen G; Gaubitch N; Brookes M; Huckvale M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):439-50. PubMed ID: 24437784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual effects of noise reduction by time-frequency masking of noisy speech.
    Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2690-9. PubMed ID: 23039461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evaluation of objective measures for intelligibility prediction of time-frequency weighted noisy speech.
    Taal CH; Hendriks RC; Heusdens R; Jensen J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3013-27. PubMed ID: 22087929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting the intelligibility of vocoded and wideband Mandarin Chinese.
    Chen F; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3281-90. PubMed ID: 21568429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Objective measures for predicting speech intelligibility in noisy conditions based on new band-importance functions.
    Ma J; Hu Y; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3387-405. PubMed ID: 19425678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intelligibility prediction for speech mixed with white Gaussian noise at low signal-to-noise ratios.
    Graetzer S; Hopkins C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Feb; 149(2):1346. PubMed ID: 33639794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intelligibility of time-compressed speech: the effect of uniform versus non-uniform time-compression algorithms.
    Schlueter A; Lemke U; Kollmeier B; Holube I
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1541-55. PubMed ID: 24606289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Audibility of American English vowels produced by English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native speakers in long-term speech-shaped noise.
    Liu C; Jin SH
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):49-55. PubMed ID: 21920420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of a simplified normalized covariance measure based on binary weighting functions for predicting the intelligibility of noise-suppressed speech.
    Chen F; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3715-23. PubMed ID: 21218903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The roles of fundamental frequency contours and sentence context in Mandarin Chinese speech intelligibility.
    Wang J; Shu H; Zhang L; Liu Z; Zhang Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):EL91-7. PubMed ID: 23862913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An Evaluation of Output Signal to Noise Ratio as a Predictor of Cochlear Implant Speech Intelligibility.
    Watkins GD; Swanson BA; Suaning GJ
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):958-968. PubMed ID: 29474218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcome measures based on classification performance fail to predict the intelligibility of binary-masked speech.
    Kressner AA; May T; Rozell CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jun; 139(6):3033. PubMed ID: 27369123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of speech modification on non-native listeners for matrix-style sentences.
    Cooke M; García Lecumberri ML; Tang Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):EL151-7. PubMed ID: 25698043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native talkers.
    van Wijngaarden SJ; Steeneken HJ; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Dec; 112(6):3004-13. PubMed ID: 12509022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native listeners.
    van Wijngaarden SJ; Steeneken HJ; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Apr; 111(4):1906-16. PubMed ID: 12002873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Talker-listener accent interactions in speech-in-noise recognition: effects of prosodic manipulation as a function of language experience.
    Pinet M; Iverson P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1357-65. PubMed ID: 20815470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.