These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25480281)

  • 1. Dental anatomy grading: comparison between conventional visual and a novel digital assessment technique.
    Kwon SR; Restrepo-Kennedy N; Dawson DV; Hernandez M; Denehy G; Blanchette D; Gratton DG; Aquilino SA; Armstrong SR
    J Dent Educ; 2014 Dec; 78(12):1655-62. PubMed ID: 25480281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Dental Students' Self-Directed, Faculty, and Software-Based Assessments of Dental Anatomy Wax-Ups: A Retrospective Study.
    Garrett PH; Faraone KL; Patzelt SB; Keaser ML
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Dec; 79(12):1437-44. PubMed ID: 26632298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Utilizing self-assessment software to evaluate student wax-ups in dental morphology.
    McPherson KR; Mennito AS; Vuthiganon J; Kritzas YG; McKinney RA; Wolf BJ; Renne WG
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Jun; 79(6):697-704. PubMed ID: 26034035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of Computer-Assisted Learning on Students' Dental Anatomy Waxing Performance.
    Kwon SR; Hernández M; Blanchette DR; Lam MT; Gratton DG; Aquilino SA
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Sep; 79(9):1093-100. PubMed ID: 26329034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inter- and Intrarater Reliability Using Different Software Versions of E4D Compare in Dental Education.
    Callan RS; Cooper JR; Young NB; Mollica AG; Furness AR; Looney SW
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Jun; 79(6):711-8. PubMed ID: 26034037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between students' self-assessment, and visual and digital assessment techniques in dental anatomy wax-up grading.
    Abdalla R; Bishop SS; Villasante-Tezanos AG; Bertoli E
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2021 Aug; 25(3):524-535. PubMed ID: 33188546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of an Innovative Digital Assessment Tool in Dental Anatomy.
    Lam MT; Kwon SR; Qian F; Denehy GE
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 May; 16(5):366-71. PubMed ID: 26162255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of Employing Different Typodonts When Using E4D Compare for Dental Student Assessment.
    Callan RS; Cooper JR; Young NB; Mollica AG; Furness AR; Looney SW
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Jun; 79(6):705-10. PubMed ID: 26034036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of Digital Tooth Preparation Evaluation Technology on Preclinical Dental Students' Technical and Self-Evaluation Skills.
    Gratton DG; Kwon SR; Blanchette D; Aquilino SA
    J Dent Educ; 2016 Jan; 80(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 26729689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dental students' opinions of preparation assessment with E4D compare software versus traditional methods.
    Hamil LM; Mennito AS; Renné WG; Vuthiganon J
    J Dent Educ; 2014 Oct; 78(10):1424-31. PubMed ID: 25281676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of Digital Technology to Improve Objective and Reliable Assessment in Dental Student Simulation Laboratories.
    Miyazono S; Shinozaki Y; Sato H; Isshi K; Yamashita J
    J Dent Educ; 2019 Oct; 83(10):1224-1232. PubMed ID: 31182626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dental students' self-assessment of operative preparations using CAD/CAM: a preliminary analysis.
    Mays KA; Levine E
    J Dent Educ; 2014 Dec; 78(12):1673-80. PubMed ID: 25480283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment skills of dental students as peer evaluators.
    Kim AH; Chutinan S; Park SE
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Jun; 79(6):653-7. PubMed ID: 26034029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dental students' preferences and performance in crown design: conventional wax-added versus CAD.
    Douglas RD; Hopp CD; Augustin MA
    J Dent Educ; 2014 Dec; 78(12):1663-72. PubMed ID: 25480282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Validity of Using E4D Compare's "% Comparison" to Assess Crown Preparations in Preclinical Dental Education.
    Callan RS; Haywood VB; Cooper JR; Furness AR; Looney SW
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Dec; 79(12):1445-51. PubMed ID: 26632299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Utilising an innovative digital software to grade pre-clinical crown preparation exercise.
    Kateeb ET; Kamal MS; Kadamani AM; Abu Hantash RO; Abu Arqoub MM
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2017 Nov; 21(4):220-227. PubMed ID: 27146473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Role of Digital 3D Scanned Models in Dental Students' Self-Assessments in Preclinical Operative Dentistry.
    Lee C; Kobayashi H; Lee SR; Ohyama H
    J Dent Educ; 2018 Apr; 82(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 29606657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why professional judgment is better than objective description in dental faculty evaluations of student performance.
    Chambers DW; Labarre EE
    J Dent Educ; 2014 May; 78(5):681-93. PubMed ID: 24789828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Triple jump examination evaluation of faculty examiners by dental student examinees.
    Navazesh M; Rich SK; Keim RG
    J Dent Educ; 2014 May; 78(5):714-22. PubMed ID: 24789831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effective use of e-grading in the dental simulation clinic.
    Morrow JA; Pulido MT; Smith PB; McDaniel TF; Willcox AB
    J Dent Educ; 2014 Jun; 78(6):829-37. PubMed ID: 24882768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.