These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25480541)

  • 1. Biomechanical characteristics, patient preference and activity level with different prosthetic feet: a randomized double blind trial with laboratory and community testing.
    Raschke SU; Orendurff MS; Mattie JL; Kenyon DE; Jones OY; Moe D; Winder L; Wong AS; Moreno-Hernández A; Highsmith MJ; J Sanderson D; Kobayashi T
    J Biomech; 2015 Jan; 48(1):146-52. PubMed ID: 25480541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lower limb amputee gait characteristics on a specifically designed test ramp: Preliminary results of a biomechanical comparison of two prosthetic foot concepts.
    Schmalz T; Altenburg B; Ernst M; Bellmann M; Rosenbaum D
    Gait Posture; 2019 Feb; 68():161-167. PubMed ID: 30497035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of prosthetic foot forefoot flexibility on oxygen cost and subjective preference rankings of unilateral transtibial prosthesis users.
    Klodd E; Hansen A; Fatone S; Edwards M
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2010; 47(6):543-52. PubMed ID: 20848367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of four different categories of prosthetic feet during ramp ambulation in unilateral transtibial amputees.
    Agrawal V; Gailey RS; Gaunaurd IA; O'Toole C; Finnieston A; Tolchin R
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Oct; 39(5):380-9. PubMed ID: 24925671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A more compliant prosthetic foot better accommodates added load while walking among Servicemembers with transtibial limb loss.
    Schnall BL; Dearth CL; Elrod JM; Golyski PR; Koehler-McNicholas SR; Ray SF; Hansen AH; Hendershot BD
    J Biomech; 2020 Jan; 98():109395. PubMed ID: 31668413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of gait training and prosthetic foot category on external work symmetry during unilateral transtibial amputee gait.
    Agrawal V; Gailey R; O'Toole C; Gaunaurd I; Finnieston A
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2013 Oct; 37(5):396-403. PubMed ID: 23364890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The development of rating scales to evaluate experiential prosthetic foot preference for people with lower limb amputation.
    Ruxin TR; Halsne EG; Hafner BJ; Shofer J; Hansen AH; Childers WL; Caputo JM; Morgenroth DC
    PM R; 2024 Feb; 16(2):150-159. PubMed ID: 37329558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of self-report and performance-based outcome measures to determine functional differences between four categories of prosthetic feet.
    Gailey RS; Gaunaurd I; Agrawal V; Finnieston A; O'Toole C; Tolchin R
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(4):597-612. PubMed ID: 22773262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transducer-based comparisons of the prosthetic feet used by transtibial amputees for different walking activities: a pilot study.
    Neumann ES; Yalamanchili K; Brink J; Lee JS
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2012 Jun; 36(2):203-16. PubMed ID: 22344316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of prosthetic foot forefoot flexibility on gait of unilateral transtibial prosthesis users.
    Klodd E; Hansen A; Fatone S; Edwards M
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2010; 47(9):899-910. PubMed ID: 21174254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Functional joint center of prosthetic feet during level ground and incline walking.
    Lecomte C; Starker F; Guðnadóttir EÞ; Rafnsdóttir S; Guðmundsson K; Briem K; Brynjolfsson S
    Med Eng Phys; 2020 Jul; 81():13-21. PubMed ID: 32527519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differences in Military Obstacle Course Performance Between Three Energy-Storing and Shock-Adapting Prosthetic Feet in High-Functioning Transtibial Amputees: A Double-Blind, Randomized Control Trial.
    Highsmith MJ; Kahle JT; Miro RM; Lura DJ; Carey SL; Wernke MM; Kim SH; Quillen WS
    Mil Med; 2016 Nov; 181(S4):45-54. PubMed ID: 27849461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. First results concerning the safety, walking, and satisfaction with an innovative, microprocessor-controlled four-axes prosthetic foot.
    Hahn A; Sreckovic I; Reiter S; Mileusnic M
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Jun; 42(3):350-356. PubMed ID: 29400252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanical and dynamic characterization of prosthetic feet for high activity users during weighted and unweighted walking.
    Koehler-McNicholas SR; Nickel EA; Barrons K; Blaharski KE; Dellamano CA; Ray SF; Schnall BL; Hendershot BD; Hansen AH
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0202884. PubMed ID: 30208040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lower-limb amputee recovery response to an imposed error in mediolateral foot placement.
    Segal AD; Klute GK
    J Biomech; 2014 Sep; 47(12):2911-8. PubMed ID: 25145315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Energy storage and release of prosthetic feet. Part 2: Subjective ratings of 2 energy storing and 2 conventional feet, user choice of foot and deciding factor.
    Postema K; Hermens HJ; de Vries J; Koopman HF; Eisma WH
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1997 Apr; 21(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 9141123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of prosthetic foot stiffness on foot-ankle biomechanics and relative foot stiffness perception in people with transtibial amputation.
    Halsne EG; Czerniecki JM; Shofer JB; Morgenroth DC
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Dec; 80():105141. PubMed ID: 32763624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lower-limb amputee ankle and hip kinetic response to an imposed error in mediolateral foot placement.
    Segal AD; Shofer JB; Klute GK
    J Biomech; 2015 Nov; 48(15):3982-3988. PubMed ID: 26475221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Biomimetic Adapter for Passive Self-alignment of Prosthetic Feet.
    Rajula VR; Springgate L; Haque A; Kamrunnahar M; Piazza SJ; Kaluf B
    Mil Med; 2021 Jan; 186(Suppl 1):665-673. PubMed ID: 33499476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An Experimental Setup to Test Obstacle-Dealing Capabilities of Prosthetic Feet.
    Pace A; Proksch L; Grioli G; Aszmann OC; Bicchi A; Catalano MG
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2023 Sep; 2023():1-6. PubMed ID: 37941253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.