253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25480681)
1. Clinical and histological features of brucellin skin test responses in Brucella suis biovar 2 infected pigs.
Dieste-Pérez L; Barberán M; Muñoz PM; Moriyón I; Blasco JM
Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 2015 Jan; 163(1-2):77-85. PubMed ID: 25480681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of skin tests with allergens from B. melitensis B115 and rough B. abortus mutants for diagnosing swine brucellosis.
Dieste-Pérez L; Blasco JM; De Miguel MJ; Marín CM; Barberán M; Conde-Álvarez R; Moriyón I; Muñoz PM
Vet Microbiol; 2014 Jan; 168(1):161-8. PubMed ID: 24331743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cell-mediated immune responses differentiate infections with Brucella suis from Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9 in pigs.
Riber U; Jungersen G
Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 2007 Mar; 116(1-2):13-25. PubMed ID: 17270281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic performance of serological tests for swine brucellosis in the presence of false positive serological reactions.
Dieste-Pérez L; Blasco JM; de Miguel MJ; Moriyón I; Muñoz PM
J Microbiol Methods; 2015 Apr; 111():57-63. PubMed ID: 25661496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differentiation between serological responses to Brucella suis and Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9 after natural or experimental infection in pigs.
Jungersen G; Sørensen V; Giese SB; Stack JA; Riber U
Epidemiol Infect; 2006 Apr; 134(2):347-57. PubMed ID: 16490140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Venezuelan field trials of vaccines against brucellosis in swine.
Lord VR; Cherwonogrodzky JW; Schurig GG; Lord RD; Marcano MJ; Meléndez GE
Am J Vet Res; 1998 May; 59(5):546-51. PubMed ID: 9582954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The feasibility of using antigens prepared with rough Brucella strains for diagnosis of canine brucellosis.
Escobar GI; Boeri EJ; Ayala SM; Lucero NE
Rev Argent Microbiol; 2010; 42(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 20461292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy of several serological tests and antigens for diagnosis of bovine brucellosis in the presence of false-positive serological results due to Yersinia enterocolitica O:9.
Muñoz PM; Marín CM; Monreal D; González D; Garin-Bastuji B; Díaz R; Mainar-Jaime RC; Moriyón I; Blasco JM
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol; 2005 Jan; 12(1):141-51. PubMed ID: 15642999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Serological discrimination by indirect enzyme immunoassay between the antibody response to Brucella sp. and Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 in cattle and pigs.
Nielsen K; Smith P; Yu W; Nicoletti P; Jungersen G; Stack J; Godfroid J
Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 2006 Jan; 109(1-2):69-78. PubMed ID: 16140390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Over-expression of homologous antigens in a leucine auxotroph of Brucella abortus strain RB51 protects mice against a virulent B. suis challenge.
Rajasekaran P; Surendran N; Seleem MN; Sriranganathan N; Schurig GG; Boyle SM
Vaccine; 2011 Apr; 29(17):3106-10. PubMed ID: 21376799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A repA-based ELISA for discriminating cattle vaccinated with Brucella suis 2 from those naturally infected with Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis.
Wang JY; Wu N; Liu WH; Ren JJ; Tang P; Qiu YH; Wang CY; Chang CD; Liu HJ
Mol Cell Probes; 2014; 28(5-6):251-4. PubMed ID: 24941369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The efficacy of the skin delayed-type hypersensitivity using a Brucellin prepared from a mucoid strain of Brucella abortus to detect brucellosis.
Bercovich Z; Muskens JA
Vet J; 1999 Jan; 157(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 10030130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. First report of Brucella suis biovar 2 in a semi free-range pig farm, Italy.
Barlozzari G; Franco A; Macrì G; Lorenzetti S; Maggiori F; Dottarelli S; Maurelli M; Di Giannatale E; Tittarelli M; Battisti A; Gamberale F
Vet Ital; 2015; 51(2):151-4. PubMed ID: 26129667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving the specificity of immunodiagnosis for porcine brucellosis.
Thirlwall RE; Commander NJ; Brew SD; Cutler SJ; McGiven JA; Stack JA
Vet Res Commun; 2008 Mar; 32(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 17934790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identification of Brucella suis from feral swine in selected states in the USA.
Pedersen K; Quance CR; Robbe-Austerman S; Piaggio AJ; Bevins SN; Goldstein SM; Gaston WD; DeLiberto TJ
J Wildl Dis; 2014 Apr; 50(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 24484477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Experimental Brucella abortus infection in pigs.
Stuart FA; Corbel MJ; Brewer RA
Vet Microbiol; 1987 Sep; 14(4):365-79. PubMed ID: 3120398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Protection of BALB/c mice against homologous and heterologous species of Brucella by rough strain vaccines derived from Brucella melitensis and Brucella suis biovar 4.
Winter AJ; Schurig GG; Boyle SM; Sriranganathan N; Bevins JS; Enright FM; Elzer PH; Kopec JD
Am J Vet Res; 1996 May; 57(5):677-83. PubMed ID: 8723881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of skin delayed-type hypersensitivity as an adjunct test to diagnose brucellosis in cattle: a review.
Bercovich Z
Vet Q; 2000 Jul; 22(3):123-30. PubMed ID: 10952440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of serology and bacterial culture to determine prevalence of Brucella spp. In feral Swine (sus scrofa) in proximity to a beef cattle herd positive for Brucella suis and Brucella abortus.
Musser JM; Schwartz AL; Srinath I; Waldrup KA
J Wildl Dis; 2013 Apr; 49(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 23568896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genetic relatedness of Brucella suis biovar 2 isolates from hares, wild boars and domestic pigs.
Kreizinger Z; Foster JT; Rónai Z; Sulyok KM; Wehmann E; Jánosi S; Gyuranecz M
Vet Microbiol; 2014 Aug; 172(3-4):492-8. PubMed ID: 24962519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
