132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25480695)
1. Retrospective evaluation of posterior direct composite restorations: 10-year findings.
Lempel E; Tóth Á; Fábián T; Krajczár K; Szalma J
Dent Mater; 2015 Feb; 31(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 25480695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 22-Year clinical evaluation of the performance of two posterior composites with different filler characteristics.
Da Rosa Rodolpho PA; Donassollo TA; Cenci MS; Loguércio AD; Moraes RR; Bronkhorst EM; Opdam NJ; Demarco FF
Dent Mater; 2011 Oct; 27(10):955-63. PubMed ID: 21762980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings.
da Rosa Rodolpho PA; Cenci MS; Donassollo TA; Loguércio AD; Demarco FF
J Dent; 2006 Aug; 34(7):427-35. PubMed ID: 16314023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are there universal restorative composites for anterior and posterior teeth?
Baldissera RA; Corrêa MB; Schuch HS; Collares K; Nascimento GG; Jardim PS; Moraes RR; Opdam NJ; Demarco FF
J Dent; 2013 Nov; 41(11):1027-35. PubMed ID: 24001506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Direct resin composite restorations for fractured maxillary teeth and diastema closure: A 7 years retrospective evaluation of survival and influencing factors.
Lempel E; Lovász BV; Meszarics R; Jeges S; Tóth Á; Szalma J
Dent Mater; 2017 Apr; 33(4):467-476. PubMed ID: 28256273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Marginal quality of posterior microhybrid resin composite restorations applied using two polymerisation protocols: 5-year randomised split mouth trial.
Barabanti N; Gagliani M; Roulet JF; Testori T; Ozcan M; Cerutti A
J Dent; 2013 May; 41(5):436-42. PubMed ID: 23454329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of resin-based composites in posterior restorations: a 3-year study.
Çelik Ç; Arhun N; Yamanel K
Med Princ Pract; 2014; 23(5):453-9. PubMed ID: 25115230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students.
Opdam NJ; Loomans BA; Roeters FJ; Bronkhorst EM
J Dent; 2004 Jul; 32(5):379-83. PubMed ID: 15193786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays compared to composite restorations.
Lange RT; Pfeiffer P
Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):263-72. PubMed ID: 19544814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical evaluation of resin-based composites in posterior restorations: two-year results.
Arhun N; Celik C; Yamanel K
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 20672723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term clinical evaluation of direct resin composite restorations in vital vs. endodontically treated posterior teeth - Retrospective study up to 13 years.
Lempel E; Lovász BV; Bihari E; Krajczár K; Jeges S; Tóth Á; Szalma J
Dent Mater; 2019 Sep; 35(9):1308-1318. PubMed ID: 31278018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-year clinical evaluation of a silorane composite resin.
Walter R; Boushell LW; Heymann HO; Ritter AV; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD; Chung Y; Swift EJ
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):179-90. PubMed ID: 24344912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial of conventional and heavy flowable composites in class II restorations.
Rocha Gomes Torres C; Rêgo HM; Perote LC; Santos LF; Kamozaki MB; Gutierrez NC; Di Nicoló R; Borges AB
J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):793-9. PubMed ID: 24769385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Repair may increase survival of direct posterior restorations - A practice based study.
Casagrande L; Laske M; Bronkhorst EM; Huysmans MCDNJM; Opdam NJM
J Dent; 2017 Sep; 64():30-36. PubMed ID: 28602850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Longevity of posterior restorations in primary teeth: results from a paediatric dental clinic.
Pinto Gdos S; Oliveira LJ; Romano AR; Schardosim LR; Bonow ML; Pacce M; Correa MB; Demarco FF; Torriani DD
J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1248-54. PubMed ID: 25150105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 2-year clinical evaluation of Class I posterior composites.
Abdalla AI; Alhadainy HA
Am J Dent; 1996 Aug; 9(4):150-2. PubMed ID: 9002789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M
J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
