127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25480695)
21. A retrospective clinical study of cervical restorations: longevity and failure-prognostic variables.
Namgung C; Rho YJ; Jin BH; Lim BS; Cho BH
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(4):376-85. PubMed ID: 23215544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
van Dijken JW
J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Survival of direct resin restorations in posterior teeth within a 19-year period (1996-2015): A meta-analysis of prospective studies.
Beck F; Lettner S; Graf A; Bitriol B; Dumitrescu N; Bauer P; Moritz A; Schedle A
Dent Mater; 2015 Aug; 31(8):958-85. PubMed ID: 26091581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Randomized controlled split-mouth clinical trial of direct laminate veneers with two micro-hybrid resin composites.
Gresnigt MM; Kalk W; Ozcan M
J Dent; 2012 Sep; 40(9):766-75. PubMed ID: 22664565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Clinical evaluation of flowable resins in non-carious cervical lesions: two-year results.
Celik C; Ozgünaltay G; Attar N
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(4):313-21. PubMed ID: 17695602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Clinical performance of ormocer, nanofilled, and nanoceramic resin composites in Class I and Class II restorations: a three-year evaluation.
Mahmoud SH; El-Embaby AE; AbdAllah AM
Oper Dent; 2014; 39(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 23614660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Six-year clinical evaluation of packable composite restorations.
Kiremitci A; Alpaslan T; Gurgan S
Oper Dent; 2009; 34(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 19192832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Longevity of direct restorations in stress-bearing posterior cavities: a retrospective study.
Rho YJ; Namgung C; Jin BH; Lim BS; Cho BH
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(6):572-82. PubMed ID: 23550914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A two-year comparison of resin-based composite tunnel and Class II restorations in a randomized controlled trial.
Kinomoto Y; Inoue Y; Ebisu S
Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):253-6. PubMed ID: 15478486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinical evaluation of different posterior resin composite materials: a 7-year report.
Türkün LS; Aktener BO; Ateş M
Quintessence Int; 2003 Jun; 34(6):418-26. PubMed ID: 12859086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Retrospective evaluation of posterior composite
resin sandwich restorations with Herculite XRV:
18-year findings.
Alonso V; Darriba IL; Caserío M
Quintessence Int; 2017; 48(2):93-101. PubMed ID: 27981270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and resin-based restorative material.
Gordan VV; Shen C; Watson RE; Mjor IA
Am J Dent; 2005 Feb; 18(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 15810481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of microhybrid, packable and nanofilled resin composites in Class I restorations.
Sadeghi M; Lynch CD; Shahamat N
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 37(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 20202097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Patient risk factors' influence on survival of posterior composites.
van de Sande FH; Opdam NJ; Rodolpho PA; Correa MB; Demarco FF; Cenci MS
J Dent Res; 2013 Jul; 92(7 Suppl):78S-83S. PubMed ID: 23690354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hinkel R
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A clinical evaluation of a giomer restorative system containing surface prereacted glass ionomer filler: results from a 13-year recall examination.
Gordan VV; Blaser PK; Watson RE; Mjör IA; McEdward DL; Sensi LG; Riley JL
J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Oct; 145(10):1036-43. PubMed ID: 25270702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical Performance of Nanofilled and Microhybrid Direct Composite Restorations on Endodontically Treated Teeth.
Akalιn TT; Bozkurt FO; Tuncer AK; Bağ HG; Özcan M
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2019 Feb; 27(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 30779495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Three-year clinical evaluation of a flowable and a hybrid resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions.
Kubo S; Yokota H; Yokota H; Hayashi Y
J Dent; 2010 Mar; 38(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 19840829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations after up to 33 years.
Da Rosa Rodolpho PA; Rodolfo B; Collares K; Correa MB; Demarco FF; Opdam NJM; Cenci MS; Moraes RR
Dent Mater; 2022 Apr; 38(4):680-688. PubMed ID: 35221128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A clinical evaluation of packable and microhybrid resin composite restorations: one-year report.
de Souza FB; Guimarães RP; Silva CH
Quintessence Int; 2005 Jan; 36(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 15709496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
