These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25480736)

  • 1. Effects of housing system on the costs of commercial egg production.
    Matthews WA; Sumner DA
    Poult Sci; 2015 Mar; 94(3):552-7. PubMed ID: 25480736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Economic and market issues on the sustainability of egg production in the United States: analysis of alternative production systems.
    Sumner DA; Gow H; Hayes D; Matthews W; Norwood B; Rosen-Molina JT; Thurman W
    Poult Sci; 2011 Jan; 90(1):241-50. PubMed ID: 21177466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of commercial housing systems and nutrient and energy intake on laying hen performance and egg quality parameters.
    Karcher DM; Jones DR; Abdo Z; Zhao Y; Shepherd TA; Xin H
    Poult Sci; 2015 Mar; 94(3):485-501. PubMed ID: 25630672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative evaluation of three egg production systems: Housing characteristics and management practices.
    Zhao Y; Shepherd TA; Swanson JC; Mench JA; Karcher DM; Xin H
    Poult Sci; 2015 Mar; 94(3):475-84. PubMed ID: 25737566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Environmental assessment of three egg production systems--Part I: Monitoring system and indoor air quality.
    Zhao Y; Shepherd TA; Li H; Xin H
    Poult Sci; 2015 Mar; 94(3):518-33. PubMed ID: 25737567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microbiological impact of three commercial laying hen housing systems.
    Jones DR; Cox NA; Guard J; Fedorka-Cray PJ; Buhr RJ; Gast RK; Abdo Z; Rigsby LL; Plumblee JR; Karcher DM; Robison CI; Blatchford RA; Makagon MM
    Poult Sci; 2015 Mar; 94(3):544-51. PubMed ID: 25480737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Environmental assessment of three egg production systems--Part II. Ammonia, greenhouse gas, and particulate matter emissions.
    Shepherd TA; Zhao Y; Li H; Stinn JP; Hayes MD; Xin H
    Poult Sci; 2015 Mar; 94(3):534-43. PubMed ID: 25737568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nutrient flow and distribution in conventional cage, enriched colony, and aviary layer houses.
    Lin XJ; Zhang R; Jiang S; Elmashad HM; Mitloehner F
    Poult Sci; 2016 Jan; 95(1):213-24. PubMed ID: 26628346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Health of Commercial Egg Laying Chickens in Different Housing Systems.
    Fulton RM
    Avian Dis; 2019 Sep; 63(3):420-426. PubMed ID: 31967424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of feeding the direct-fed microbial, primalac, on growth parameters and egg production in single comb white leghorn hens.
    Davis GS; Anderson KE
    Poult Sci; 2002 Jun; 81(6):755-9. PubMed ID: 12079039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating production costs and retail prices in different poultry housing systems: conventional, enriched cage, aviary, and barn in Japan.
    Kato H; Shimizuike Y; Yasuda K; Yoshimatsu R; Yasuda KT; Imamura Y; Imai R
    Poult Sci; 2022 Dec; 101(12):102194. PubMed ID: 36274436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of a commercial housing system on egg quality during extended storage.
    Jones DR; Karcher DM; Abdo Z
    Poult Sci; 2014 May; 93(5):1282-8. PubMed ID: 24795324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "Cracking" into the debate about laying hen housing.
    Bir C; Thompson NM; Tyner WE; Hu J; Widmar NJO
    Poult Sci; 2018 May; 97(5):1595-1604. PubMed ID: 29462486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An economic analysis of a modified, enriched cage egg production system.
    Walker AW; Tucker SA; Elson HA
    Br Poult Sci; 1998 Dec; 39 Suppl():S14-5. PubMed ID: 10188020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sustainability of egg production in the United States--the policy and market context.
    Mench JA; Sumner DA; Rosen-Molina JT
    Poult Sci; 2011 Jan; 90(1):229-40. PubMed ID: 21177465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reproductive performance and quality of offsprings of parent stock of layer hens after rearing in open and closed aviary system.
    Damaziak K; Musielak M; Musielak C; Riedel J; Gozdowski D
    Poult Sci; 2021 Feb; 100(2):1120-1131. PubMed ID: 33518071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk factors associated with keel bone and foot pad disorders in laying hens housed in aviary systems.
    Heerkens JL; Delezie E; Rodenburg TB; Kempen I; Zoons J; Ampe B; Tuyttens FA
    Poult Sci; 2016 Mar; 95(3):482-8. PubMed ID: 26628344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of increased bird population in a fixed cage area on production and economic responses of single comb white leghorn laying hens.
    Roush WB; Mashaly MM; Graves HB
    Poult Sci; 1984 Jan; 63(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 6701142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Survey of egg farmers regarding the ban on conventional cages in the EU and their opinion of alternative layer housing systems in Flanders, Belgium.
    Stadig LM; Ampe BA; Van Gansbeke S; Van den Bogaert T; D'Haenens E; Heerkens JL; Tuyttens FA
    Poult Sci; 2016 Mar; 95(3):715-25. PubMed ID: 26574025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hen genetic strain and extended cold storage influence on physical egg quality from cage-free aviary housing system.
    Jones DR; Karcher DM; Regmi P; Robison CO; Gast RK
    Poult Sci; 2018 Jul; 97(7):2347-2355. PubMed ID: 29617856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.