These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25480934)

  • 1. Validation of magnetocardiography versus fractional flow reserve for detection of coronary artery disease.
    Park JW; Shin ES; Ann SH; Gödde M; Park LS; Brachmann J; Vidal-Lopez S; Wierzbinski J; Lam YY; Jung F
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2015; 59(3):267-81. PubMed ID: 25480934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incremental diagnostic value of combined quantitative and qualitative parameters of magnetocardiography to detect coronary artery disease.
    Shin ES; Lam YY; Her AY; Brachmann J; Jung F; Park JW
    Int J Cardiol; 2017 Feb; 228():948-952. PubMed ID: 27912204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dobutamine stress magnetocardiography for the detection of significant coronary artery stenoses - a prospective study in comparison with simultaneous 12-lead electrocardiography.
    Park JW; Leithäuser B; Vrsansky M; Jung F
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2008; 39(1-4):21-32. PubMed ID: 18503107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Noninvasive Detection of Functional Myocardial Ischemia: Multifunction Cardiogram Evaluation in Diagnosis of Functional Coronary Ischemia Study (MED-FIT).
    Kawaji T; Shiomi H; Morimoto T; Nishikawa R; Yano M; Higami H; Tazaki J; Imai M; Saito N; Makiyama T; Shizuta S; Ono K; Kimura T
    Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol; 2015 Sep; 20(5):446-53. PubMed ID: 25594689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease: a comparison with coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve.
    Rieber J; Huber A; Erhard I; Mueller S; Schweyer M; Koenig A; Schiele TM; Theisen K; Siebert U; Schoenberg SO; Reiser M; Klauss V
    Eur Heart J; 2006 Jun; 27(12):1465-71. PubMed ID: 16720685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of exercise electrocardiography and magnetocardiography for detection of coronary artery disease using ST-segment fluctuation score.
    Shin ES; Chung JH; Park SG; Saleh A; Lam YY; Bhak J; Jung F; Morita S; Brachmann J
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2019; 73(2):283-291. PubMed ID: 30775972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of myocardial transmural perfusion gradient by magnetic resonance imaging to fractional flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
    Pan J; Huang S; Lu Z; Li J; Wan Q; Zhang J; Gao C; Yang X; Wei M
    Am J Cardiol; 2015 May; 115(10):1333-40. PubMed ID: 25796365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relative flow reserve derived from quantitative perfusion imaging may not outperform stress myocardial blood flow for identification of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.
    Stuijfzand WJ; Uusitalo V; Kero T; Danad I; Rijnierse MT; Saraste A; Raijmakers PG; Lammertsma AA; Harms HJ; Heymans MW; Huisman MC; Marques KM; Kajander SA; Pietilä M; Sörensen J; van Royen N; Knuuti J; Knaapen P
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 25596142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative magnetic resonance perfusion imaging detects anatomic and physiologic coronary artery disease as measured by coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve.
    Costa MA; Shoemaker S; Futamatsu H; Klassen C; Angiolillo DJ; Nguyen M; Siuciak A; Gilmore P; Zenni MM; Guzman L; Bass TA; Wilke N
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Aug; 50(6):514-22. PubMed ID: 17678734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multicenter evaluation of dynamic three-dimensional magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease defined by fractional flow reserve.
    Manka R; Wissmann L; Gebker R; Jogiya R; Motwani M; Frick M; Reinartz S; Schnackenburg B; Niemann M; Gotschy A; Kuhl C; Nagel E; Fleck E; Marx N; Luescher TF; Plein S; Kozerke S
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 May; 8(5):. PubMed ID: 25901043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing stress testing and fractional flow reserve to evaluate presence, location and extent of ischemia in coronary artery disease.
    Pattanshetty DJ; Bhat PK; Gandhi S; Pillai DP; Aneja A
    Indian Heart J; 2015; 67(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 25820051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of pressure-derived myocardial fractional flow reserve in chronic hemodialysis patients.
    Hirose K; Chikamori T; Hida S; Tanaka N; Yamashita J; Igarashi Y; Saitoh T; Tanaka H; Yamashina A
    J Cardiol; 2018 Jan; 71(1):52-58. PubMed ID: 29183566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Whole-heart dynamic three-dimensional magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease defined by fractional flow reserve: determination of volumetric myocardial ischaemic burden and coronary lesion location.
    Manka R; Paetsch I; Kozerke S; Moccetti M; Hoffmann R; Schroeder J; Reith S; Schnackenburg B; Gaemperli O; Wissmann L; Wyss CA; Kaufmann PA; Corti R; Boesiger P; Marx N; Lüscher TF; Jahnke C
    Eur Heart J; 2012 Aug; 33(16):2016-24. PubMed ID: 22677136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Magnetocardiography scoring system to predict the presence of obstructive coronary artery disease.
    Shin ES; Park SG; Saleh A; Lam YY; Bhak J; Jung F; Morita S; Brachmann J
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2018; 70(4):365-373. PubMed ID: 30320564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Features of ST segment and T-wave in exercise-induced myocardial ischemia evaluated with multichannel magnetocardiography.
    Hänninen H; Takala P; Korhonen P; Oikarinen L; Mäkijärvi M; Nenonen J; Katila T; Toivonen L
    Ann Med; 2002; 34(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 12108575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.
    Ko BS; Cameron JD; Meredith IT; Leung M; Antonis PR; Nasis A; Crossett M; Hope SA; Lehman SJ; Troupis J; DeFrance T; Seneviratne SK
    Eur Heart J; 2012 Jan; 33(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 21810860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hemodynamic evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft lesions using fractional flow reserve.
    Aqel R; Zoghbi GJ; Hage F; Dell'Italia L; Iskandrian AE
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Oct; 72(4):479-85. PubMed ID: 18814221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of anatomical and functional severity of coronary atherosclerotic plaques on the transmural perfusion gradient: a [15O]H2O PET study.
    Danad I; Raijmakers PG; Harms HJ; Heymans MW; van Royen N; Lubberink M; Boellaard R; van Rossum AC; Lammertsma AA; Knaapen P
    Eur Heart J; 2014 Aug; 35(31):2094-105. PubMed ID: 24780500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of age on fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) trial substudy.
    Lim HS; Tonino PA; De Bruyne B; Yong AS; Lee BK; Pijls NH; Fearon WF
    Int J Cardiol; 2014 Nov; 177(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 25499342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of fractional flow reserve measurement on the clinical management of patients with coronary artery disease evaluated with noninvasive stress tests prior to cardiac catheterization.
    Lachance P; Déry JP; Rodés-Cabau J; Potvin JM; Barbeau G; Bertrand OF; Gleeton O; Larose E; Nguyen CM; Noël B; Proulx G; Roy L; De Larochellière R
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2008; 9(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 18928947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.