305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25481387)
1. The influence of the dwell time deviation constraint (DTDC) parameter on dosimetry with IPSA optimisation for HDR prostate brachytherapy.
Smith RL; Panettieri V; Lancaster C; Mason N; Franich RD; Millar JL
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2015 Mar; 38(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 25481387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Study of the effects of dwell time deviation constraints on inverse planning simulated annealing optimized plans of intracavitary brachytherapy of cancer cervix.
Roy S; Subramani V; Singh K; Rathi AK; Savita A; Aditi A
J Cancer Res Ther; 2019; 15(6):1370-1376. PubMed ID: 31898675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Plan quality score to evaluate the dwell time deviation restricted inverse planning by simulated annealing and graphically optimized treatment plans for template based interstitial brachytherapy.
Mondal K; Muskaan ; Mourya A; Choudhary S; Mandal A; Singh A; Aggarwal LM
Cancer Radiother; 2023 May; 27(3):196-205. PubMed ID: 37088572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robustness of IPSA optimized high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy treatment plans to catheter displacements.
Poder J; Whitaker M
J Contemp Brachytherapy; 2016 Jun; 8(3):201-7. PubMed ID: 27504129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A method for restricting intracatheter dwell time variance in high-dose-rate brachytherapy plan optimization.
Cunha A; Siauw T; Hsu IC; Pouliot J
Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(2):246-51. PubMed ID: 26727333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of IPSA and HIPO inverse planning optimization algorithms for prostate HDR brachytherapy.
Panettieri V; Smith RL; Mason NJ; Millar JL
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 15(6):5055. PubMed ID: 25493531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of inverse planning simulated annealing and geometrical optimization for prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Hsu IC; Lessard E; Weinberg V; Pouliot J
Brachytherapy; 2004; 3(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 15533807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric impact of dwell time deviation constraint on inverse brachytherapy treatment planning and comparison with conventional optimization method for interstitial brachytherapy implants.
Roy S; Subramani V; Singh K; Rathi AK
J Cancer Res Ther; 2021; 17(2):463-470. PubMed ID: 34121693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of anatomy-based inverse planning with simulated annealing and graphical optimization for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Morton GC; Sankreacha R; Halina P; Loblaw A
Brachytherapy; 2008; 7(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 18037356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analytical HDR prostate brachytherapy planning with automatic catheter and isotope selection.
Frank CH; Ramesh P; Lyu Q; Ruan D; Park SJ; Chang AJ; Venkat PS; Kishan AU; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2023 Oct; 50(10):6525-6534. PubMed ID: 37650773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of prostate catheter displacement in inverse planning--simulated annealing and geometric optimization.
Reynés-Llompart G; Pino F; Modolell I; Gullón C; Pera J; Gutierrez C; Picón C
Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(1):112-7. PubMed ID: 26612698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adaptation of the CVT algorithm for catheter optimization in high dose rate brachytherapy.
Poulin E; Fekete CA; Létourneau M; Fenster A; Pouliot J; Beaulieu L
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111724. PubMed ID: 24320432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dwell time modulation restrictions do not necessarily improve treatment plan quality for prostate HDR brachytherapy.
Balvert M; Gorissen BL; den Hertog D; Hoffmann AL
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(2):537-48. PubMed ID: 25549084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Early clinical experience with anatomy-based inverse planning dose optimization for high-dose-rate boost of the prostate.
Lachance B; Béliveau-Nadeau D; Lessard E; Chrétien M; Hsu IC; Pouliot J; Beaulieu L; Vigneault E
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Sep; 54(1):86-100. PubMed ID: 12182978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric comparison of inverse optimisation methods versus forward optimisation in HDR brachytherapy of breast, cervical and prostate cancer.
Fröhlich G; Geszti G; Vízkeleti J; Ágoston P; Polgár C; Major T
Strahlenther Onkol; 2019 Nov; 195(11):991-1000. PubMed ID: 31482321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dosimetric comparison of volume-based and inverse planning simulated annealing-based dose optimizations for high-dose rate brachytherapy.
Pelagade S; Maddirala HR; Misra R; Suryanarayan U; Neema JP
Med Dosim; 2015; 40(3):235-9. PubMed ID: 25795565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of the dwell time deviation constraint on brachytherapy treatment planning for cervical cancer.
Yan G; Kang S; Tang B; Li J; Wang P; Wang X; Lang J
J Int Med Res; 2021 Aug; 49(8):3000605211037477. PubMed ID: 34423665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A novel urethral sparing technique for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy after transurethral resection of the prostate.
Kunogi H; Cunha JAM; Chang AJ; Gadzinski AJ; Shinohara K; Hsu IC
Brachytherapy; 2017; 16(6):1113-1118. PubMed ID: 28869143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosimetric impact of inter-observer catheter reconstruction variability in ultrasound-based high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Nicolae A; Murgic J; Kruljac I; Dubnitzky L; D'Alimonte L; Lu L; Cumal A; Law N; Morton G; Loblaw A; Chung HT; Ravi A
Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(2):306-312. PubMed ID: 29239812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of inverse optimization algorithms for HDR/PDR prostate brachytherapy treatment planning.
Dinkla AM; van der Laarse R; Kaljouw E; Pieters BR; Koedooder K; van Wieringen N; Bel A
Brachytherapy; 2015; 14(2):279-88. PubMed ID: 25447341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
