308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25481532)
1. How do systematic reviews incorporate risk of bias assessments into the synthesis of evidence? A methodological study.
Katikireddi SV; Egan M; Petticrew M
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2015 Feb; 69(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 25481532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How do systematic reviews of acupuncture for pain relief incorporate risk of bias assessments into the synthesis? A methodological study.
Li XQ; Tao KM; Yang GL; Zhou QH; Ling CQ
Acupunct Med; 2016 Apr; 34(2):84-9. PubMed ID: 26526002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection in treating knee osteoarthritis: assessing risk of bias in systematic reviews with ROBIS tool.
Xing D; Wang B; Zhang W; Yang Z; Hou Y; Chen Y; Lin J
Int J Rheum Dis; 2017 Nov; 20(11):1658-1673. PubMed ID: 29044993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Methodological tools and sensitivity analysis for assessing quality or risk of bias used in systematic reviews published in the high-impact anesthesiology journals.
Marušić MF; Fidahić M; Cepeha CM; Farcaș LG; Tseke A; Puljak L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 May; 20(1):121. PubMed ID: 32423382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Methodological quality and risk of bias in orthodontic systematic reviews using AMSTAR and ROBIS.
Hooper EJ; Pandis N; Cobourne MT; Seehra J
Eur J Orthod; 2021 Oct; 43(5):544-550. PubMed ID: 33723612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk of bias tool in systematic reviews/meta-analyses of acupuncture in Chinese journals.
Liu Y; Yang S; Dai J; Xu Y; Zhang R; Jiang H; Yan X; Yang K
PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e28130. PubMed ID: 22174772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Methodological quality and risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews of treatments for peri-implantitis.
Hasuike A; Ueno D; Nagashima H; Kubota T; Tsukune N; Watanabe N; Sato S
J Periodontal Res; 2019 Aug; 54(4):374-387. PubMed ID: 30671962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is the evaluation of risk of bias in periodontology and implant dentistry comprehensive? A systematic review.
Faggion CM; Listl S; Alarcón MA
J Clin Periodontol; 2015 May; 42(5):488-94. PubMed ID: 25809114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk of bias tools in systematic reviews of health interventions: an analysis of PROSPERO-registered protocols.
Farrah K; Young K; Tunis MC; Zhao L
Syst Rev; 2019 Nov; 8(1):280. PubMed ID: 31730014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use and reporting of risk of bias tools in 825 systematic reviews of acupuncture: a cross-sectional study.
Long Y; Wang X; Xiao W; Chen R; Guo Q; Liu J; Shao R; Huang J; Du L
Acupunct Med; 2021 Aug; 39(4):318-326. PubMed ID: 32811166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR.
Dosenovic S; Jelicic Kadic A; Vucic K; Markovina N; Pieper D; Puljak L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):37. PubMed ID: 29739339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the reliability, usability, and applicability of AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2, and ROBIS: protocol for a descriptive analytic study.
Gates A; Gates M; Duarte G; Cary M; Becker M; Prediger B; Vandermeer B; Fernandes RM; Pieper D; Hartling L
Syst Rev; 2018 Jun; 7(1):85. PubMed ID: 29898777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews of Non-Randomized Studies of Adverse Cardiovascular Effects of Thiazolidinediones and Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors: Application of a New Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.
Bilandzic A; Fitzpatrick T; Rosella L; Henry D
PLoS Med; 2016 Apr; 13(4):e1001987. PubMed ID: 27046153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk of bias assessments and reporting quality of systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials examining acupuncture for depression: An overview and meta-epidemiology study.
Luo S; Long Y; Xiao W; Wang X; Chen R; Guo Q; Liu J; Shao R; Du L; Chen M
J Evid Based Med; 2020 Feb; 13(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 32112515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Do we need to improve the reporting of evidence in tendinopathy management? A critical appraisal of systematic reviews with recommendations on strength of evidence assessment.
Challoumas D; Millar NL
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med; 2021; 7(1):e000920. PubMed ID: 33692904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk of bias assessment of sequence generation: a study of 100 systematic reviews of trials.
Wuytack F; Regan M; Biesty L; Meskell P; Lutomski JE; O'Donnell M; Treweek S; Devane D
Syst Rev; 2019 Jan; 8(1):13. PubMed ID: 30621793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characteristics of the sources, evaluation, and grading of the certainty of evidence in systematic reviews in public health: A methodological study.
Xun Y; Guo Q; Ren M; Liu Y; Sun Y; Wu S; Lan H; Zhang J; Liu H; Wang J; Shi Q; Wang Q; Wang P; Chen Y; Shao R; Xu DR
Front Public Health; 2023; 11():998588. PubMed ID: 37064677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conflict of interest and risk of bias in systematic reviews on methylphenidate for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a cross-sectional study.
Snellman A; Carlberg S; Olsson L
Syst Rev; 2023 Sep; 12(1):175. PubMed ID: 37752560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for depression: a cross-sectional study.
Chung VCH; Wu XY; Feng Y; Ho RST; Wong SYS; Threapleton D
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci; 2018 Dec; 27(6):619-627. PubMed ID: 28462754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
