These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

32 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25484316)

  • 1. The predictive validity of quality of evidence grades for the stability of effect estimates was low: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Gartlehner G; Dobrescu A; Evans TS; Bann C; Robinson KA; Reston J; Thaler K; Skelly A; Glechner A; Peterson K; Kien C; Lohr KN
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():52-60. PubMed ID: 26342443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Users identified challenges in applying GRADE to complex interventions and suggested an extension to GRADE.
    Movsisyan A; Melendez-Torres GJ; Montgomery P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():191-9. PubMed ID: 26388040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematic reviews showed insufficient evidence for clinical practice in 2004: what about in 2011? The next appeal for the evidence-based medicine age.
    Villas Boas PJ; Spagnuolo RS; Kamegasawa A; Braz LG; Polachini do Valle A; Jorge EC; Yoo HH; Cataneo AJ; Corrêa I; Fukushima FB; do Nascimento P; Módolo NS; Teixeira MS; de Oliveira Vidal EI; Daher SR; El Dib R
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2013 Aug; 19(4):633-7. PubMed ID: 22747638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. AHRQ series paper 5: grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions--agency for healthcare research and quality and the effective health-care program.
    Owens DK; Lohr KN; Atkins D; Treadwell JR; Reston JT; Bass EB; Chang S; Helfand M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 May; 63(5):513-23. PubMed ID: 19595577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The GRADE approach is reproducible in assessing the quality of evidence of quantitative evidence syntheses.
    Mustafa RA; Santesso N; Brozek J; Akl EA; Walter SD; Norman G; Kulasegaram M; Christensen R; Guyatt GH; Falck-Ytter Y; Chang S; Murad MH; Vist GE; Lasserson T; Gartlehner G; Shukla V; Sun X; Whittington C; Post PN; Lang E; Thaler K; Kunnamo I; Alenius H; Meerpohl JJ; Alba AC; Nevis IF; Gentles S; Ethier MC; Carrasco-Labra A; Khatib R; Nesrallah G; Kroft J; Selk A; Brignardello-Petersen R; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jul; 66(7):736-42; quiz 742.e1-5. PubMed ID: 23623694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. GRADE guidelines 26: informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions.
    Santesso N; Glenton C; Dahm P; Garner P; Akl EA; Alper B; Brignardello-Petersen R; Carrasco-Labra A; De Beer H; Hultcrantz M; Kuijpers T; Meerpohl J; Morgan R; Mustafa R; Skoetz N; Sultan S; Wiysonge C; Guyatt G; Schünemann HJ;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Mar; 119():126-135. PubMed ID: 31711912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An algorithm was developed to assign GRADE levels of evidence to comparisons within systematic reviews.
    Pollock A; Farmer SE; Brady MC; Langhorne P; Mead GE; Mehrholz J; van Wijck F; Wiffen PJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():106-10. PubMed ID: 26341023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. GRADE system: new paradigm.
    Terracciano L; Brozek J; Compalati E; Schünemann H
    Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol; 2010 Aug; 10(4):377-83. PubMed ID: 20610980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.
    Groenvold M
    Dan Med Bull; 2010 Sep; 57(9):B4184. PubMed ID: 20816024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methodological considerations of the GRADE method.
    Malmivaara A
    Ann Med; 2015 Feb; 47(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 25356772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conclusiveness resolves the conflict between quality of evidence and imprecision in GRADE.
    Anttila S; Persson J; Vareman N; Sahlin NE
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jul; 75():1-5. PubMed ID: 27063204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Subjectivity is a strength: a comment on "an algorithm was developed to assign GRADE levels of evidence to comparisons within systematic reviews".
    Gionfriddo MR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 74():237. PubMed ID: 26769254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence implementation: doing it and reporting it right.
    McArthur A
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jun; 13(5):1-2. PubMed ID: 26455598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High quality (certainty) evidence changes less often than low-quality evidence, but the magnitude of effect size does not systematically differ between studies with low versus high-quality evidence.
    Djulbegovic B; Ahmed MM; Hozo I; Koletsi D; Hemkens L; Price A; Riera R; Nadanovsky P; Dos Santos APP; Melo D; Pathak R; Pacheco RL; Fontes LE; Miranda E; Nunan D
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2022 Jun; 28(3):353-362. PubMed ID: 35089627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A critical appraisal of the methodology and quality of evidence of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traditional Chinese medical nursing interventions: a systematic review of reviews.
    Jin YH; Wang GH; Sun YR; Li Q; Zhao C; Li G; Si JH; Li Y; Lu C; Shang HC
    BMJ Open; 2016 Nov; 6(11):e011514. PubMed ID: 28186925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Grades for quality of evidence were associated with distinct likelihoods that treatment effects will remain stable.
    Gartlehner G; Sommer I; Evans TS; Thaler K; Lohr KN
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 May; 68(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 25484316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.