These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25484972)

  • 41. Comparison of open and laparoscopic pyeloplasty in ureteropelvic junction obstruction surgery: report of 49 cases.
    Umari P; Lissiani A; Trombetta C; Belgrano E
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2011 Dec; 83(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 22670313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Long-term Outcomes of Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction.
    Hopf HL; Bahler CD; Sundaram CP
    Urology; 2016 Apr; 90():106-10. PubMed ID: 26801810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Navigating the difficult robotic assisted pyeloplasty.
    Thiel DD
    ISRN Urol; 2012; 2012():291235. PubMed ID: 23213571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Which is better--retroperitoneoscopic or laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children?
    Canon SJ; Jayanthi VR; Lowe GJ
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 2):1791-5; discussion 1795. PubMed ID: 17707427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Trends in ureteropelvic junction obstruction management among urologists in the United States.
    Tan BJ; Rastinehad AR; Marcovich R; Smith AD; Lee BR
    Urology; 2005 Feb; 65(2):260-4. PubMed ID: 15708034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Initial comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children.
    Yee DS; Shanberg AM; Duel BP; Rodriguez E; Eichel L; Rajpoot D
    Urology; 2006 Mar; 67(3):599-602. PubMed ID: 16504272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Is retroperitoneal approach feasible for robotic dismembered pyeloplasty: initial experience and long-term results.
    Kaouk JH; Hafron J; Parekattil S; Moinzadeh A; Stein R; Gill IS; Hegarty N
    J Endourol; 2008 Sep; 22(9):2153-9. PubMed ID: 18811572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Totally minimally invasive robot-assisted unstented pyeloplasty using the Zeus Microwrist Surgical System: an animal study.
    Lorincz A; Knight CG; Kant AJ; Langenburg SE; Rabah R; Gidell K; Dawe E; Klein MD; McLorie G
    J Pediatr Surg; 2005 Feb; 40(2):418-22. PubMed ID: 15750940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Retroperitoneoscopic assisted pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children].
    Luque Mialdea R; Martin-Crespo Izquierdo R; Díaz Gómez L; Moreno L; Carrero C; Cebrian J
    Cir Pediatr; 2007 Apr; 20(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 17650721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Combination of laparoscopic and open procedure in dismembered pyeloplasty: report of 51 cases.
    Gao ZL; Shi L; Yang MS; Wang L; Yang DD; Sun DK; Liu QZ; Men CP; Wu JT; Zhang P
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2006 May; 119(10):840-4. PubMed ID: 16732987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Technical modifications for robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
    Mendez-Torres F; Woods M; Thomas R
    J Endourol; 2005 Apr; 19(3):393-6. PubMed ID: 15865534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty: using reconstructive methods based on intraoperative findings.
    Kawa G; Tatsumi M; Hiura Y; Muguruma K; Kinoshita H; Matsuda T
    Int J Urol; 2006 Sep; 13(9):1171-4. PubMed ID: 16984547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A comparison between laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Simforoosh N; Basiri A; Tabibi A; Danesh AK; Sharifi-Aghdas F; Ziaee SA; Nooralizadeh A; Hosseini-Moghaddam SM
    Urol J; 2004; 1(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 17914681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Wang X; Zhang Z; Peng N; Liu C
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2013; 21(3):429-39. PubMed ID: 24004873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Management of secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction after failed primary laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
    Varkarakis IM; Bhayani SB; Allaf ME; Inagaki T; Ong AM; Kavoussi LR; Jarrett TW
    J Urol; 2004 Jul; 172(1):180-2. PubMed ID: 15201766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison of open and endourologic approaches to the obstructed ureteropelvic junction.
    Brooks JD; Kavoussi LR; Preminger GM; Schuessler WW; Moore RG
    Urology; 1995 Dec; 46(6):791-5. PubMed ID: 7502417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Robotic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population.
    Casale P
    Curr Opin Urol; 2009 Jan; 19(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 19057224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: evolution of a new gold standard.
    Moon DA; El-Shazly MA; Chang CM; Gianduzzo TR; Eden CG
    Urology; 2006 May; 67(5):932-6. PubMed ID: 16635516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evolution in the treatment of the ureteropelvic junction obstruction syndrome. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty.
    Rivas JG; Gregorio SA; Sánchez LC; Portella PF; Gómez ÁT; Ledo JC; Sebastián JD; Barthel JJ
    Cent European J Urol; 2015; 68(3):384-8. PubMed ID: 26568887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Robotic-assisted pyeloplasty in children: a systematic review of the literature.
    Esposito C; Cerulo M; Lepore B; Coppola V; D'Auria D; Esposito G; Carulli R; Del Conte F; Escolino M
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Aug; 17(4):1239-1246. PubMed ID: 36913057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.