These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25487136)
1. Diagnostic prostate biopsy performed in a non-academic center increases the risk of re-classification at confirmatory biopsy for men considering active surveillance for prostate cancer. Wong LM; Ferrara S; Alibhai SM; Evans A; Van der Kwast T; Trottier G; Timilshina N; Toi A; Kulkarni G; Hamilton R; Zlotta A; Fleshner N; Finelli A Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2015 Mar; 18(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 25487136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A negative confirmatory biopsy among men on active surveillance for prostate cancer does not protect them from histologic grade progression. Wong LM; Alibhai SM; Trottier G; Timilshina N; Van der Kwast T; Zlotta A; Lawrentschuk N; Kulkarni G; Hamilton R; Ferrara S; Margel D; Trachtenberg J; Jewett MA; Toi A; Evans A; Fleshner NE; Finelli A Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):406-13. PubMed ID: 23664820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Regular transition zone biopsy during active surveillance for prostate cancer may improve detection of pathological progression. Wong LM; Toi A; Van der Kwast T; Trottier G; Alibhai SM; Timilshina N; Evans A; Zlotta A; Fleshner N; Finelli A J Urol; 2014 Oct; 192(4):1088-93. PubMed ID: 24742593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume. Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk prediction tool for grade re-classification in men with favourable-risk prostate cancer on active surveillance. Mamawala MM; Rao K; Landis P; Epstein JI; Trock BJ; Tosoian JJ; Pienta KJ; Carter HB BJU Int; 2017 Jul; 120(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 27469419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter? Jin BS; Kang SH; Kim DY; Oh HG; Kim CI; Moon GH; Kwon TG; Park JS Korean J Urol; 2015 Sep; 56(9):624-9. PubMed ID: 26366274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Percent of prostate needle biopsy cores with cancer is significant independent predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence following radical prostatectomy: results from SEARCH database. Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC; J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2136-41. PubMed ID: 12771735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Population based study of predictors of adverse pathology among candidates for active surveillance with Gleason 6 prostate cancer. Vellekoop A; Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Stattin P J Urol; 2014 Feb; 191(2):350-7. PubMed ID: 24071481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictors of pathologic progression on biopsy among men on active surveillance for localized prostate cancer: the value of the pattern of surveillance biopsies. Cary KC; Cowan JE; Sanford M; Shinohara K; Perez N; Chan JM; Meng MV; Carroll PR Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):337-42. PubMed ID: 24035632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The percentage of prostate needle biopsy cores with carcinoma from the more involved side of the biopsy as a predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database. Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(11):2344-50. PubMed ID: 14635068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The prognostic significance of perineural invasion and race in men considering active surveillance. Cohn JA; Dangle PP; Wang CE; Brendler CB; Novakovic KR; McGuire MS; Helfand BT BJU Int; 2014 Jul; 114(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 24106869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Unilateral positive biopsies in low risk prostate cancer patients diagnosed with extended transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy schemes do not predict unilateral prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy. Gallina A; Maccagnano C; Suardi N; Capitanio U; Abdollah F; Raber M; Salonia A; Scattoni V; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2 Pt 2):E64-8. PubMed ID: 22093108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical and pathologic outcome after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer patients with a preoperative Gleason sum of 8 to 10. Bastian PJ; Gonzalgo ML; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Presti JC; Mangold LA; Humphreys E; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Freedland SJ Cancer; 2006 Sep; 107(6):1265-72. PubMed ID: 16900523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of immediate confirmatory prostate biopsy to ensure accurate eligibility for active surveillance. Motamedinia P; RiChard JL; McKiernan JM; DeCastro GJ; Benson MC Urology; 2012 Nov; 80(5):1070-4. PubMed ID: 23107398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prostate biopsy clinical and pathological variables that predict significant grading changes in patients with intermediate and high grade prostate cancer. Moussa AS; Li J; Soriano M; Klein EA; Dong F; Jones JS BJU Int; 2009 Jan; 103(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 18782303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration is positively associated with rate of disease reclassification on subsequent active surveillance prostate biopsy in men with low PSA density. Umbehr MH; Platz EA; Peskoe SB; Bhavsar NA; Epstein JI; Landis P; Partin AW; Carter HB BJU Int; 2014 Apr; 113(4):561-7. PubMed ID: 23746233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biopsy Core Features are Poor Predictors of Adverse Pathology in Men with Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer. Audenet F; Vertosick EA; Fine SW; Sjoberg DD; Vickers AJ; Reuter VE; Eastham JA; Scardino PT; Touijer KA J Urol; 2018 Apr; 199(4):961-968. PubMed ID: 29030317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does cumulative prostate cancer length (CCL) in prostate biopsies improve prediction of clinically insignificant cancer at radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance? Chen DJ; Falzarano SM; McKenney JK; Przybycin CG; Reynolds JP; Roma A; Jones JS; Stephenson A; Klein E; Magi-Galluzzi C BJU Int; 2015 Aug; 116(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 25060664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Subtyping the Risk of Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer for Active Surveillance Based on Adverse Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy. Patel HD; Gupta M; Tosoian JJ; Carter HB; Partin AW; Epstein JI J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1068-1074. PubMed ID: 29673946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prostate-specific antigen vs prostate-specific antigen density as a predictor of upgrading in men diagnosed with Gleason 6 prostate cancer by contemporary multicore prostate biopsy. Oh JJ; Hong SK; Lee JK; Lee BK; Lee S; Kwon OS; Byun SS; Lee SE BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E494-9. PubMed ID: 22540236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]