201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25487554)
1. Economic total maximum daily load for watershed-based pollutant trading.
Zaidi AZ; deMonsabert SM
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Apr; 22(8):6308-24. PubMed ID: 25487554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Linking trading ratio with TMDL (total maximum daily load) allocation matrix and uncertainty analysis.
Zhang HX
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 18653943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of bacteria and benthic total maximum daily loads: a case study, Linville Creek, Virginia.
Benham BL; Brannan KM; Yagow G; Zeckoski RW; Dillaha TA; Mostaghimi S; Wynn JW
J Environ Qual; 2005; 34(5):1860-72. PubMed ID: 16151238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of total maximum daily loads for bacteria impaired watershed using the comprehensive hydrology and water quality simulation model.
Kim SM; Brannan KM; Zeckoski RW; Benham BL
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2014; 49(9):1077-89. PubMed ID: 24798906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Watershed-based point sources permitting strategy and dynamic permit-trading analysis.
Ning SK; Chang NB
J Environ Manage; 2007 Sep; 84(4):427-46. PubMed ID: 16930806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk-based decision making to evaluate pollutant reduction scenarios.
Ahmadisharaf E; Benham BL
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Feb; 702():135022. PubMed ID: 31731127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Management of unregulated agricultural nonpoint sources through water quality trading market.
Mahjoobi E; Sarang A; Ardestani M
Water Sci Technol; 2016 Nov; 74(9):2162-2176. PubMed ID: 27842036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Bayesian approach for evaluation of the effect of water quality model parameter uncertainty on TMDLs: A case study of Miyun Reservoir.
Liang S; Jia H; Xu C; Xu T; Melching C
Sci Total Environ; 2016 Aug; 560-561():44-54. PubMed ID: 27093122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of an environmental decision support system to a water quality trading program affected by surface water diversions.
Obropta CC; Niazi M; Kardos JS
Environ Manage; 2008 Dec; 42(6):946-56. PubMed ID: 18592303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Baseline requirements can hinder trades in water quality trading programs: Evidence from the Conestoga watershed.
Ghosh G; Ribaudo M; Shortle J
J Environ Manage; 2011 Aug; 92(8):2076-84. PubMed ID: 21507559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing and improving the outcomes of nonpoint source water quality trading policies in urban areas: A case study in Virginia.
Saby L; Herbst RS; Goodall JL; Nelson JD; Culver TB; Stephens E; Marquis CM; Band LE
J Environ Manage; 2023 Nov; 345():118724. PubMed ID: 37542805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Opportunities for Reducing Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) compliance costs: lessons from the Chesapeake Bay.
Wainger LA
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 46(17):9256-65. PubMed ID: 22891870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of a multivariate analysis modeling approach identifying sources and patterns of nonpoint fecal pollution in a mixed use watershed.
Reitz A; Hemric E; Hall KK
J Environ Manage; 2021 Jan; 277():111413. PubMed ID: 33035938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Watershed model calibration framework developed using an influence coefficient algorithm and a genetic algorithm and analysis of pollutant discharge characteristics and load reduction in a TMDL planning area.
Cho JH; Lee JH
J Environ Manage; 2015 Nov; 163():2-10. PubMed ID: 26275596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Framework Design and Influencing Factor Analysis of a Water Environmental Functional Zone-Based Effluent Trading System.
Chen L; Han Z; Li S; Shen Z
Environ Manage; 2016 Oct; 58(4):645-54. PubMed ID: 27515023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modeling climate change impacts on water trading.
Luo B; Maqsood I; Gong Y
Sci Total Environ; 2010 Apr; 408(9):2034-41. PubMed ID: 20188398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Integrated watershed- and farm-scale modeling framework for targeting critical source areas while maintaining farm economic viability.
Ghebremichael LT; Veith TL; Hamlett JM
J Environ Manage; 2013 Jan; 114():381-94. PubMed ID: 23195139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Estimation of nonpoint source pollutant loads and optimization of the best management practices (BMPs) in the Zhangweinan River basin].
Xu HS; Xu ZX; Liu P
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2013 Mar; 34(3):882-91. PubMed ID: 23745390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nonpoint Source Water Quality Trading outcomes: Landscape-scale patterns and integration with watershed management priorities.
Saby L; Nelson JD; Band LE; Goodall JL
J Environ Manage; 2021 Sep; 294():112914. PubMed ID: 34119996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spatial and temporal pollutant budget analyses toward the total maximum daily loads management for the Yeongsan watershed in Korea.
Ki SJ; Lee YG; Kim SW; Lee YJ; Kim JH
Water Sci Technol; 2007; 55(1-2):367-74. PubMed ID: 17305161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
