These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25487868)

  • 1. Are introspective reaction times affected by the method of time estimation? A comparison of visual analogue scales and reproduction.
    Bryce D; Bratzke D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):978-84. PubMed ID: 25487868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal discrimination of one's own reaction times in dual-task performance: Context effects and methodological constraints.
    Bratzke D; Bryce D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Aug; 78(6):1806-16. PubMed ID: 27311578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are participants' reports of their own reaction times reliable? Re-examining introspective limitations in active and passive dual-task paradigms.
    Bryce D; Bratzke D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jan; 172():1-9. PubMed ID: 27825020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Introspective reports of reaction times in dual-tasks reflect experienced difficulty rather than timing of cognitive processes.
    Bryce D; Bratzke D
    Conscious Cogn; 2014 Jul; 27():254-67. PubMed ID: 24956469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Introspection about backward crosstalk in dual-task performance.
    Bratzke D; Janczyk M
    Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):605-617. PubMed ID: 31974636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The surprising role of stimulus modality in the dual-task introspective blind spot: a memory account.
    Bryce D; Bratzke D
    Psychol Res; 2022 Jun; 86(4):1332-1354. PubMed ID: 34255135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Limits on introspection: distorted subjective time during the dual-task bottleneck.
    Corallo G; Sackur J; Dehaene S; Sigman M
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1110-7. PubMed ID: 19076482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Subjective estimates of total processing time in dual-tasking: (some) good news for bad introspection.
    Bratzke D; Bryce D
    Psychol Res; 2023 Jul; 87(5):1560-1568. PubMed ID: 36367568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Introspection is not always blind to the costs of multitasking: The case of task switching.
    Bratzke D; Bryce D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jun; 45(6):980-992. PubMed ID: 30113205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.
    Göthe K; Oberauer K; Kliegl R
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():92-108. PubMed ID: 26878090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Serial or overlapping processing in multitasking as individual preference: Effects of stimulus preview on task switching and concurrent dual-task performance.
    Reissland J; Manzey D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Jul; 168():27-40. PubMed ID: 27155317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mapping introspection's blind spot: reconstruction of dual-task phenomenology using quantified introspection.
    Marti S; Sackur J; Sigman M; Dehaene S
    Cognition; 2010 May; 115(2):303-13. PubMed ID: 20129603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A neuropsychological assessment of dual-task costs in closed-head injury patients using Cohen's effect size estimation method.
    Dell'Acqua R; Sessa P; Pashler H
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):553-61. PubMed ID: 16142490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Asymmetric interference in concurrent time-to-contact estimation: Cousin or twin of the psychological refractory period effect?
    Baurès R; DeLucia PR; Olson M; Oberfeld D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):698-711. PubMed ID: 27896708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stopping while going! Response inhibition does not suffer dual-task interference.
    Yamaguchi M; Logan GD; Bissett PG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):123-34. PubMed ID: 21574740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Isolating component processes of posterror slowing with the psychological refractory period paradigm.
    Steinhauser M; Ernst B; Ibald KW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Apr; 43(4):653-659. PubMed ID: 27709985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence for a response preparation bottleneck during dual-task performance: effect of a startling acoustic stimulus on the psychological refractory period.
    Maslovat D; Chua R; Spencer HC; Forgaard CJ; Carlsen AN; Franks IM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):481-7. PubMed ID: 24076331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Central interference in driving: is there any stopping the psychological refractory period?
    Levy J; Pashler H; Boer E
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Mar; 17(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 16507063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Timing of internal processes: Investigating introspection about the costs of task switching and memory search.
    Bratzke D; Bryce D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Jul; 84(5):1501-1508. PubMed ID: 35610412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The neural effect of stimulus-response modality compatibility on dual-task performance: an fMRI study.
    Stelzel C; Schumacher EH; Schubert T; D'Esposito M
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):514-25. PubMed ID: 16175414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.