BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25487914)

  • 1. The impact of varying patient populations on the in-control performance of the risk-adjusted CUSUM chart.
    Tian W; Sun H; Zhang X; Woodall WH
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2015 Feb; 27(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 25487914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic probability control limits for risk-adjusted Bernoulli CUSUM charts.
    Zhang X; Woodall WH
    Stat Med; 2015 Nov; 34(25):3336-48. PubMed ID: 26037959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic probability control limits for risk-adjusted CUSUM charts based on multiresponses.
    Zhang X; Loda JB; Woodall WH
    Stat Med; 2017 Jul; 36(16):2547-2558. PubMed ID: 28425116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the effect of estimation error on risk-adjusted CUSUM chart performance.
    Jones MA; Steiner SH
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2012 Apr; 24(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 22190589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A simple signaling rule for variable life-adjusted display derived from an equivalent risk-adjusted CUSUM chart.
    Wittenberg P; Gan FF; Knoth S
    Stat Med; 2018 Jul; 37(16):2455-2473. PubMed ID: 29667215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improved implementation of the risk-adjusted Bernoulli CUSUM chart to monitor surgical outcome quality.
    Keefe MJ; Loda JB; Elhabashy AE; Woodall WH
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2017 Jun; 29(3):343-348. PubMed ID: 28444331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk-adjusted CUSUM charts under model error.
    Knoth S; Wittenberg P; Gan FF
    Stat Med; 2019 May; 38(12):2206-2218. PubMed ID: 30722100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk-adjusted monitoring of time to event in the presence of long-term survivors.
    Oliveira JW; Valença DM; Medeiros PG; Marçula M
    Biom J; 2016 Nov; 58(6):1485-1505. PubMed ID: 27645002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk-adjusted monitoring of survival times.
    Sego LH; Reynolds MR; Woodall WH
    Stat Med; 2009 Apr; 28(9):1386-401. PubMed ID: 19247982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of surveillance methods for small incidence rates.
    Sego LH; Woodall WH; Reynolds MR
    Stat Med; 2008 Apr; 27(8):1225-47. PubMed ID: 17879266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monitoring binary outcomes using risk-adjusted charts: a comparative study.
    Gombay E; Hussein AA; Steiner SH
    Stat Med; 2011 Oct; 30(23):2815-26. PubMed ID: 21786279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of statistical process control (risk-adjusted CUSUM, risk-adjusted RSPRT and CRAM with prediction limits) for monitoring the outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients rescued by the EMS system.
    Chen TT; Chung KP; Hu FC; Fan CM; Yang MC
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2011 Feb; 17(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 20807294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of risk-adjusted CUSUM and RSPRT charts for monitoring in medical contexts.
    Grigg OA; Farewell VT; Spiegelhalter DJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2003 Mar; 12(2):147-70. PubMed ID: 12665208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhanced cumulative sum charts for monitoring process dispersion.
    Abujiya MR; Riaz M; Lee MH
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0124520. PubMed ID: 25901356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical process monitoring to improve quality assurance of inpatient care.
    Hubig L; Lack N; Mansmann U
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 Jan; 20(1):21. PubMed ID: 31910826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CUSUM analyses of time-interval data for online radiation monitoring.
    Luo P; Devol TA; Sharp JL
    Health Phys; 2012 Jun; 102(6):637-45. PubMed ID: 22549320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monitoring surgical and medical outcomes: the Bernoulli cumulative SUM chart. A novel application to assess clinical interventions.
    Leandro G; Rolando N; Gallus G; Rolles K; Burroughs AK
    Postgrad Med J; 2005 Oct; 81(960):647-52. PubMed ID: 16210461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Change point detection in risk adjusted control charts.
    Assareh H; Smith I; Mengersen K
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Dec; 24(6):747-68. PubMed ID: 22025415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Integral equation solutions for the average run length for monitoring shifts in the mean of a generalized seasonal ARFIMAX(P, D, Q, r)s process running on a CUSUM control chart.
    Areepong Y; Peerajit W
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0264283. PubMed ID: 35213619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of risk-adjusted control charts to monitor in-hospital mortality of intensive care unit patients: a simulation study.
    Koetsier A; de Keizer NF; de Jonge E; Cook DA; Peek N
    Crit Care Med; 2012 Jun; 40(6):1799-807. PubMed ID: 22610184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.