224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25487998)
1. A biomechanical investigation of dual growing rods used for fusionless scoliosis correction.
Quick ME; Grant CA; Adam CJ; Askin GN; Labrom RD; Pearcy MJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 Jan; 30(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 25487998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preclinical testing of a wedge-rod system for fusionless correction of scoliosis.
Betz RR; Cunningham B; Selgrath C; Drewry T; Sherman MC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S275-8. PubMed ID: 14560203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Flexible non-fusion scoliosis correction systems reduce intervertebral rotation less than rigid implants and allow growth of the spine: a finite element analysis of different features of orthobiom.
Rohlmann A; Zander T; Burra NK; Bergmann G
Eur Spine J; 2008 Feb; 17(2):217-23. PubMed ID: 17712575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In Vitro Biomechanical Validation of a Self-Adaptive Ratchet Growing Rod Construct for Fusionless Scoliosis Correction.
Chen ZX; Kaliya-Perumal AK; Niu CC; Wang JL; Lai PL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Nov; 44(21):E1231-E1240. PubMed ID: 31181015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanics of spinal hemiepiphysiodesis for fusionless scoliosis treatment using titanium implant.
Coombs MT; Glos DL; Wall EJ; Kim J; Bylski-Austrow DI
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(23):E1454-60. PubMed ID: 23873232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Biomechanical evaluation of stiffness of long-segment instrumented spine].
Zhang J; Lu WW; Ye QB; Qiu GX
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2005 Apr; 27(2):153-5. PubMed ID: 15960256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro biomechanical study to quantify range of motion, intradiscal pressure, and facet force of 3-level dynamic stabilization constructs with decreased stiffness.
Lee JK; Gomez J; Michelsen C; Kim Y; Moldavsky M; Chinthakunta SR; Khalil S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22):1913-9. PubMed ID: 23921330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Porcine spine finite element model: a complementary tool to experimental scoliosis fusionless instrumentation.
Hachem B; Aubin CE; Parent S
Eur Spine J; 2017 Jun; 26(6):1610-1617. PubMed ID: 28070685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anterior thoracic scoliosis constructs: effect of rod diameter and intervertebral cages on multi-segmental construct stability.
Polly DW; Cunningham BW; Kuklo TR; Lenke LG; Oda I; Schroeder TM; Klemme WR
Spine J; 2003; 3(3):213-9. PubMed ID: 14589202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of constrained dual-screw anchorage on holding strength and the resistance to cyclic loading in anterior spinal deformity surgery: a comparative biomechanical study.
Koller H; Fierlbeck J; Auffarth A; Niederberger A; Stephan D; Hitzl W; Augat P; Zenner J; Blocher M; Blocher M; Resch H; Mayer M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(6):E390-8. PubMed ID: 24384666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical analysis of Goel technique for C1-2 fusion.
Park J; Scheer JK; Lim TJ; Deviren V; Ames CP
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):639-46. PubMed ID: 21332283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical analysis of cervicothoracic junction osteotomy in cadaveric model of ankylosing spondylitis: effect of rod material and diameter.
Scheer JK; Tang JA; Deviren V; Acosta F; Buckley JM; Pekmezci M; McClellan RT; Ames CP
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Mar; 14(3):330-5. PubMed ID: 21235305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationship of forces acting on implant rods and degree of scoliosis correction.
Salmingo RA; Tadano S; Fujisaki K; Abe Y; Ito M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2013 Feb; 28(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 23273729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dual and single memory rod construct comparison in an animal study.
Newton PO; Farnsworth CL; Upasani VV; Chambers R; Yoon SH; Firkins P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(14):E904-13. PubMed ID: 21217429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of repeated loading and freeze-thaw cycling on immature bovine thoracic motion segment stiffness.
Sunni N; Askin GN; Labrom RD; Izatt MT; Pearcy MJ; Adam CJ
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2014 Oct; 228(10):1100-7. PubMed ID: 25406230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An initial biomechanical investigation of fusionless anterior tether constructs for controlled scoliosis correction.
Lavelle WF; Moldavsky M; Cai Y; Ordway NR; Bucklen BS
Spine J; 2016 Mar; 16(3):408-13. PubMed ID: 26582489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanics of polyaryletherketone rod composites and titanium rods for posterior lumbosacral instrumentation. Presented at the 2010 Joint Spine Section Meeting. Laboratory investigation.
Bruner HJ; Guan Y; Yoganandan N; Pintar FA; Maiman DJ; Slivka MA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Dec; 13(6):766-72. PubMed ID: 21121756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Treatment of early-onset scoliosis with a hybrid of a concave magnetic driver (magnetic controlled growth rod) and a contralateral passive sliding rod construct with apical control: preliminary report on 17 cases.
Skov ST; Wijdicks SPJ; Bünger C; Castelein RM; Li H; Kruyt MC
Spine J; 2018 Jan; 18(1):122-129. PubMed ID: 28687252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An in vitro biomechanical comparison of single-rod, dual-rod, and dual-rod with transverse connector in anterior thoracolumbar instrumentation.
Reddy CG; Magnetta M; Dahdaleh NS; Demmer M; Iyamah KA; Lim TH; Torner JC; Hitchon PW
Neurosurgery; 2012 Apr; 70(4):1017-23; discussion 1023. PubMed ID: 22009252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Toward a better understanding of direct vertebral rotation for AIS surgery: development of a multisegmental biomechanical model and factors affecting correction.
Badve SA; Ordway NR; Albanese SA; Lavelle WF
Spine J; 2015 May; 15(5):1034-40. PubMed ID: 25490613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
