176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25488063)
1. Facial landmark localization by curvature maps and profile analysis.
Lippold C; Liu X; Wangdo K; Drerup B; Schreiber K; Kirschneck C; Moiseenko T; Danesh G
Head Face Med; 2014 Dec; 10():54. PubMed ID: 25488063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Preliminary study on the method of automatically determining facial landmarks based on three-dimensional face template].
Wen AN; Zhu YJ; Zheng SW; Xiao N; Gao ZX; Fu XL; Wang Y; Zhao Y
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Apr; 57(4):358-365. PubMed ID: 35368162
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on facial images captured on a 3D camera.
Othman SA; Ahmad R; Mericant AF; Jamaludin M
Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 23785939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on 3D laser-scanned facial images.
Toma AM; Zhurov A; Playle R; Ong E; Richmond S
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2009 Feb; 12(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 19154273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implementing a superimposition and measurement model for 3D sagittal analysis of therapy-induced changes in facial soft tissue: a pilot study.
Hoefert CS; Bacher M; Herberts T; Krimmel M; Reinert S; Hoefert S; Göz G
J Orofac Orthop; 2010 May; 71(3):221-34. PubMed ID: 20503004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of an automated method of 3D soft tissue landmark detection.
Baksi S; Freezer S; Matsumoto T; Dreyer C
Eur J Orthod; 2021 Dec; 43(6):622-630. PubMed ID: 33377968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Preliminary Study of the Reliability of Anatomical Facial Landmarks Used in Facial Comparison.
Lee WJ; Kim DM; Lee UY; Cho JH; Kim MS; Hong JH; Hwang YI
J Forensic Sci; 2019 Mar; 64(2):519-527. PubMed ID: 30107642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Metric precision via soft-tissue landmarks in three-dimensional structured-light scans of human faces.
Fink M; Medelnik J; Strobel K; Hirschfelder U; Hofmann E
J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Mar; 75(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 24577017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability of a face scanner in measuring the vertical dimension of occlusion.
Srinivasan M; Berisha F; Bronzino I; Kamnoedboon P; Leles CR
J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105016. PubMed ID: 38679136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A proposal for soft tissue landmarks for craniofacial analysis using 3-dimensional laser scan imaging.
Baik HS; Lee HJ; Lee KJ
World J Orthod; 2006; 7(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 16548301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new method for automatic tracking of facial landmarks in 3D motion captured images (4D).
Al-Anezi T; Khambay B; Peng MJ; O'Leary E; Ju X; Ayoub A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 42(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 23218511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Divergence between CBCT and Optical Scans for Soft Tissue Analysis and Cephalometry in Facial Imaging: A cross-sectional study on healthy adults.
Farronato M; Cenzato N; Crispino R; Tartaglia FC; Biagi R; Baldini B; Maspero C
Int Orthod; 2024 Jun; 22(2):100845. PubMed ID: 38350255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison study of different facial soft tissue analysis methods.
Kook MS; Jung S; Park HJ; Oh HK; Ryu SY; Cho JH; Lee JS; Yoon SJ; Kim MS; Shin HK
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):648-56. PubMed ID: 24954528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional prediction of nose morphology in Chinese young adults: a pilot study combining cone-beam computed tomography and 3dMD photogrammetry system.
Chu G; Zhao JM; Han MQ; Mou QN; Ji LL; Zhou H; Chen T; Du SY; Guo YC
Int J Legal Med; 2020 Sep; 134(5):1803-1816. PubMed ID: 32647961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 3D Facial Landmark Localization for cephalometric analysis.
Torres HR; Morais P; Fritze A; Oliveira B; Veloso F; Rudiger M; Fonseca JC; Vilaca JL
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2022 Jul; 2022():1016-1019. PubMed ID: 36083940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Distances between facial landmarks can be measured accurately with a new digital 3-dimensional video system.
Schimmel M; Christou P; Houstis O; Herrmann FR; Kiliaridis S; Müller F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):580.e1-580.e10; discussion 580-1. PubMed ID: 20451768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vivo reliability of 3D cephalometric landmark determination on magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study.
Juerchott A; Freudlsperger C; Zingler S; Saleem MA; Jende JME; Lux CJ; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Hilgenfeld T
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Mar; 24(3):1339-1349. PubMed ID: 31352517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of facial soft-tissue profiles based on lateral photographs versus three-dimensional face scans.
Fink M; Hirschfelder U; Hirschinger V; Schmid M; Spitzl C; Detterbeck A; Hofmann E
J Orofac Orthop; 2017 Jan; 78(1):70-76. PubMed ID: 27812721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the laser scanner as a surface measuring tool and its accuracy compared with direct facial anthropometric measurements.
Aung SC; Ngim RC; Lee ST
Br J Plast Surg; 1995 Dec; 48(8):551-8. PubMed ID: 8548155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 3D facial landmarks: Inter-operator variability of manual annotation.
Fagertun J; Harder S; Rosengren A; Moeller C; Werge T; Paulsen RR; Hansen TF
BMC Med Imaging; 2014 Oct; 14():35. PubMed ID: 25306436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
