These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

700 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25488105)

  • 1. In-vivo assessment of the morphology and hemodynamic functions of the BioValsalva™ composite valve-conduit graft using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and computational modelling technology.
    Kidher E; Cheng Z; Jarral OA; O'Regan DP; Xu XY; Athanasiou T
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 Dec; 9():193. PubMed ID: 25488105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of Hemodynamic Conditions in the Aorta Following Root Replacement with Composite Valve-Conduit Graft.
    Cheng Z; Kidher E; Jarral OA; O'Regan DP; Wood NB; Athanasiou T; Xu XY
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2016 May; 44(5):1392-404. PubMed ID: 26369636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hemodynamic Evaluation of a Biological and Mechanical Aortic Valve Prosthesis Using Patient-Specific MRI-Based CFD.
    Hellmeier F; Nordmeyer S; Yevtushenko P; Bruening J; Berger F; Kuehne T; Goubergrits L; Kelm M
    Artif Organs; 2018 Jan; 42(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 28853220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient-specific computational fluid dynamics-assessment of aortic hemodynamics in a spectrum of aortic valve pathologies.
    Youssefi P; Gomez A; He T; Anderson L; Bunce N; Sharma R; Figueroa CA; Jahangiri M
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Jan; 153(1):8-20.e3. PubMed ID: 27847162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reduction of aberrant aortic haemodynamics following aortic root replacement with a mechanical valved conduit.
    Keller EJ; Malaisrie SC; Kruse J; McCarthy PM; Carr JC; Markl M; Barker AJ; Collins JD
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Sep; 23(3):416-23. PubMed ID: 27245620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Time-resolved 3-dimensional magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging (4D Flow MRI) reveals altered blood flow patterns in the ascending aorta of patients with valve-sparing aortic root replacement.
    Oechtering TH; Sieren MM; Hunold P; Hennemuth A; Huellebrand M; Scharfschwerdt M; Richardt D; Sievers HH; Barkhausen J; Frydrychowicz A
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Mar; 159(3):798-810.e1. PubMed ID: 31078313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Time-resolved 3-dimensional magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging (4D Flow MRI) analysis of hemodynamics in valve-sparing aortic root repair with an anatomically shaped sinus prosthesis.
    Oechtering TH; Hons CF; Sieren M; Hunold P; Hennemuth A; Huellebrand M; Drexl J; Scharfschwerdt M; Richardt D; Sievers HH; Barkhausen J; Frydrychowicz A
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Aug; 152(2):418-427.e1. PubMed ID: 27423836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of the sinuses of Valsalva in aortic root flow dynamics and aortic root surgery: evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging.
    Schoenhoff FS; Loupatatzis C; Immer FF; Stoupis C; Carrel TP; Eckstein FS
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2009 Jul; 18(4):380-5. PubMed ID: 19852141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Aortic flow after valve sparing root replacement with or without neosinuses reconstruction.
    Gaudino M; Piatti F; Lau C; Sturla F; Weinsaft JW; Weltert L; Votta E; Galea N; Chirichilli I; Di Franco A; Francone M; Catalano C; Redaelli A; Girardi LN; De Paulis R
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 Feb; 157(2):455-465. PubMed ID: 30139642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visualization of flow patterns distal to aortic valve prostheses in humans using a fast approach for cine 3D velocity mapping.
    Kozerke S; Hasenkam JM; Pedersen EM; Boesiger P
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 May; 13(5):690-8. PubMed ID: 11329190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of transcatheter aortic valve degeneration.
    Dwyer HA; Matthews PB; Azadani A; Jaussaud N; Ge L; Guy TS; Tseng EE
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Aug; 9(2):301-8. PubMed ID: 19414489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integrated morphologic and functional assessment of the aortic root after different tissue valve root replacement procedures.
    Torii R; El-Hamamsy I; Donya M; Babu-Narayan SV; Ibrahim M; Kilner PJ; Mohiaddin RH; Xu XY; Yacoub MH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Jun; 143(6):1422-8. PubMed ID: 22361248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comprehensive analysis of haemodynamics in patients with physiologically curved prostheses of the ascending aorta.
    Sieren MM; Balks MF; Schlueter JK; Wegner F; Huellebrand M; Scharfschwerdt M; Barkhausen J; Frydrychowicz A; Gabbert DD; Oechtering TH
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2022 Jun; 62(1):. PubMed ID: 34409435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro assessment of heart valve bioprostheses by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: four-dimensional mapping of flow patterns and orifice area planimetry.
    von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F; Dieringer MA; Greiser A; Schulz-Menger J
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Sep; 40(3):736-42. PubMed ID: 21342775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Early hemodynamic performance of the BioValsalva valved conduit after aortic root replacement.
    Badiu CC; Deutsch MA; Bleiziffer S; Krane M; Hettich I; Voss B; Mazzitelli D; Lange R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 Jan; 23(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 24779335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aortic hemodynamics assessment prior and after valve sparing reconstruction: A patient-specific 4D flow-based FSI model.
    Nannini G; Caimi A; Palumbo MC; Saitta S; Girardi LN; Gaudino M; Roman MJ; Weinsaft JW; Redaelli A
    Comput Biol Med; 2021 Aug; 135():104581. PubMed ID: 34174756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computational fluid dynamic study of hemodynamic effects on aortic root blood flow of systematically varied left ventricular assist device graft anastomosis design.
    Callington A; Long Q; Mohite P; Simon A; Mittal TK
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Sep; 150(3):696-704. PubMed ID: 26092505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of numerical simulation methods in aortic arch using 4D Flow MRI.
    Miyazaki S; Itatani K; Furusawa T; Nishino T; Sugiyama M; Takehara Y; Yasukochi S
    Heart Vessels; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1032-1044. PubMed ID: 28444501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 4D flow CMR analysis comparing patients with anatomically shaped aortic sinus prostheses, tube prostheses and healthy subjects introducing the wall shear stress gradient: a case control study.
    Sieren MM; Schultz V; Fujita B; Wegner F; Huellebrand M; Scharfschwerdt M; Sievers HH; Barkhausen J; Frydrychowicz A; Oechtering TH
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2020 Aug; 22(1):59. PubMed ID: 32772927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Blood flow competition after aortic valve bypass: an evaluation using computational fluid dynamics.
    Kawahito K; Kimura N; Komiya K; Nakamura M; Misawa Y
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2017 May; 24(5):670-676. PubMed ID: 28453794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.