BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25489035)

  • 41. Impact of multiple births and elective deliveries on the trends in low birth weight in Norway, 1967-1995.
    Daltveit AK; Vollset SE; Skjaerven R; Irgens LM
    Am J Epidemiol; 1999 Jun; 149(12):1128-33. PubMed ID: 10369507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Teen mothers, unintended pregnancies, and costs across Delaware.
    Maiden K; Gunter WD; Martin SS; Ehrenthal DB
    Del Med J; 2014 Apr; 86(4):109-16. PubMed ID: 25000643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Changes in Caesarean Delivery Rates in Western Australia from 1995 to 2010 by Gestational Age at Birth.
    Einarsdóttir K; Ball S; Pereira G; Griffin C; Jacoby P; de Klerk N; Leonard H; Stanley FJ
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2015 Jul; 29(4):290-8. PubMed ID: 26111442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Induction rates and delivery outcomes after a policy limiting elective inductions.
    Yamasato K; Bartholomew M; Durbin M; Kimata C; Kaneshiro B
    Matern Child Health J; 2015 May; 19(5):1115-20. PubMed ID: 25272996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Late preterm infants, early term infants, and timing of elective deliveries.
    Engle WA; Kominiarek MA
    Clin Perinatol; 2008 Jun; 35(2):325-41, vi. PubMed ID: 18456072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Incidence, risk factors, and obstetrical outcomes of women with breast cancer in pregnancy.
    Abenhaim HA; Azoulay L; Holcroft CA; Bure LA; Assayag J; Benjamin A
    Breast J; 2012; 18(6):564-8. PubMed ID: 23127117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Breech delivery and foetal outcome: a review of 291 cases.
    Mekbib TA
    Ethiop Med J; 1995 Jul; 33(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 7588656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance — United States, 2012.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Warner L; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2015 Aug; 64(6):1-29. PubMed ID: 26270152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Is preeclampsia associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery if labor is induced?
    Kim LH; Cheng YW; Delaney S; Jelin AC; Caughey AB
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 May; 23(5):383-8. PubMed ID: 19951010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Reconsideration of the costs of convenience: quality, operational, and fiscal strategies to minimize elective labor induction.
    Simpson KR
    J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2010; 24(1):43-52; quiz 53-4. PubMed ID: 20147829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The association between obstetrical interventions and late preterm birth.
    Bassil KL; Yasseen AS; Walker M; Sgro MD; Shah PS; Smith GN; Campbell DM; Mamdani M; Sprague AE; Lee SK; Maguire JL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jun; 210(6):538.e1-9. PubMed ID: 24582931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Medicaid costs of live births from unintended pregnancies in Florida.
    Hopkins RS; Marshall H; Hoecherl S
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1995 Aug; 82(8):540-3. PubMed ID: 7561732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2011.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2014 Nov; 63(10):1-28. PubMed ID: 25412164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Elective induction of labor in multiparous women. Does it increase the risk of cesarean section?
    Heinberg EM; Wood RA; Chambers RB
    J Reprod Med; 2002 May; 47(5):399-403. PubMed ID: 12063879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Racial disparities in outcomes of twin pregnancies: elective cesarean or trial of labor?
    Drassinower D; Timofeev J; Huang CC; Landy HJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Aug; 211(2):160.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24534184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Gentle obstetrical management for very early preterm deliveries].
    Schneider H
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2004 Jan; 44(1):10-18. PubMed ID: 14673223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Operative deliveries in low-risk pregnancies in The Netherlands: primary versus secondary care.
    Maassen MS; Hendrix MJ; Van Vugt HC; Veersema S; Smits F; Nijhuis JG
    Birth; 2008 Dec; 35(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 19036039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Does medical insurance type (private vs public) influence the physician's decision to perform Caesarean delivery?
    Movsas TZ; Wells E; Mongoven A; Grigorescu V
    J Med Ethics; 2012 Aug; 38(8):470-3. PubMed ID: 22562949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A national estimate of the elective primary cesarean delivery rate.
    Meikle SF; Steiner CA; Zhang J; Lawrence WL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):751-6. PubMed ID: 15802401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women.
    Vrouenraets FP; Roumen FJ; Dehing CJ; van den Akker ES; Aarts MJ; Scheve EJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):690-7. PubMed ID: 15802392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.