These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

700 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25489973)

  • 1. Brain-machine interfaces in neurorehabilitation of stroke.
    Soekadar SR; Birbaumer N; Slutzky MW; Cohen LG
    Neurobiol Dis; 2015 Nov; 83():172-9. PubMed ID: 25489973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Brain-machine interface (BMI) in paralysis.
    Chaudhary U; Birbaumer N; Curado MR
    Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2015 Feb; 58(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 25623294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Brain-machine interface facilitated neurorehabilitation via spinal stimulation after spinal cord injury: Recent progress and future perspectives.
    Alam M; Rodrigues W; Pham BN; Thakor NV
    Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 1646():25-33. PubMed ID: 27216571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Brain-machine interfaces for rehabilitation of poststroke hemiplegia.
    Ushiba J; Soekadar SR
    Prog Brain Res; 2016; 228():163-83. PubMed ID: 27590969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Brain computer interfaces for neurorehabilitation – its current status as a rehabilitation strategy post-stroke.
    van Dokkum LEH; Ward T; Laffont I
    Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2015 Feb; 58(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 25614021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Brain-Computer Interfaces With Multi-Sensory Feedback for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Case Study.
    Irimia DC; Cho W; Ortner R; Allison BZ; Ignat BE; Edlinger G; Guger C
    Artif Organs; 2017 Nov; 41(11):E178-E184. PubMed ID: 29148137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing Recalibration Strategies for Electroencephalography-Based Decoders of Movement Intention in Neurological Patients with Motor Disability.
    López-Larraz E; Ibáñez J; Trincado-Alonso F; Monge-Pereira E; Pons JL; Montesano L
    Int J Neural Syst; 2018 Sep; 28(7):1750060. PubMed ID: 29463157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determining optimal mobile neurofeedback methods for motor neurorehabilitation in children and adults with non-progressive neurological disorders: a scoping review.
    Behboodi A; Lee WA; Hinchberger VS; Damiano DL
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Sep; 19(1):104. PubMed ID: 36171602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Brain-machine Interface (BMI)-based Neurorehabilitation for Post-stroke Upper Limb Paralysis.
    Liu M; Ushiba J
    Keio J Med; 2022 Dec; 71(4):82-92. PubMed ID: 35718470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Motor priming in virtual reality can augment motor-imagery training efficacy in restorative brain-computer interaction: a within-subject analysis.
    Vourvopoulos A; Bermúdez I Badia S
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Aug; 13(1):69. PubMed ID: 27503007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Brain-machine interfaces for rehabilitation in stroke: A review.
    López-Larraz E; Sarasola-Sanz A; Irastorza-Landa N; Birbaumer N; Ramos-Murguialday A
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2018; 43(1):77-97. PubMed ID: 30056435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. EEG-based Brain-Computer Interface to support post-stroke motor rehabilitation of the upper limb.
    Cincotti F; Pichiorri F; Aricò P; Aloise F; Leotta F; de Vico Fallani F; Millán Jdel R; Molinari M; Mattia D
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():4112-5. PubMed ID: 23366832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation.
    Krakauer JW
    Curr Opin Neurol; 2006 Feb; 19(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 16415682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. From assistance towards restoration with epidural brain-computer interfacing.
    Gharabaghi A; Naros G; Walter A; Grimm F; Schuermeyer M; Roth A; Bogdan M; Rosenstiel W; Birbaumer N
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2014; 32(4):517-25. PubMed ID: 25015699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A review of the progression and future implications of brain-computer interface therapies for restoration of distal upper extremity motor function after stroke.
    Remsik A; Young B; Vermilyea R; Kiekhoefer L; Abrams J; Evander Elmore S; Schultz P; Nair V; Edwards D; Williams J; Prabhakaran V
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2016 May; 13(5):445-54. PubMed ID: 27112213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neuroplasticity subserving the operation of brain-machine interfaces.
    Oweiss KG; Badreldin IS
    Neurobiol Dis; 2015 Nov; 83():161-71. PubMed ID: 25968934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What Turns Assistive into Restorative Brain-Machine Interfaces?
    Gharabaghi A
    Front Neurosci; 2016; 10():456. PubMed ID: 27790085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Review on motor imagery based BCI systems for upper limb post-stroke neurorehabilitation: From designing to application.
    Khan MA; Das R; Iversen HK; Puthusserypady S
    Comput Biol Med; 2020 Aug; 123():103843. PubMed ID: 32768038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploring the Use of Brain-Computer Interfaces in Stroke Neurorehabilitation.
    Yang S; Li R; Li H; Xu K; Shi Y; Wang Q; Yang T; Sun X
    Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():9967348. PubMed ID: 34239936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Brain-Machine Interfaces: From Basic Science to Neuroprostheses and Neurorehabilitation.
    Lebedev MA; Nicolelis MA
    Physiol Rev; 2017 Apr; 97(2):767-837. PubMed ID: 28275048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.