353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25490126)
1. Harmful situations, impure people: an attribution asymmetry across moral domains.
Chakroff A; Young L
Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():30-7. PubMed ID: 25490126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. When minds matter for moral judgment: intent information is neurally encoded for harmful but not impure acts.
Chakroff A; Dungan J; Koster-Hale J; Brown A; Saxe R; Young L
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Mar; 11(3):476-84. PubMed ID: 26628642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mind attributions about moral actors: intentionality is greater given coherent cues.
Hughes JS; Trafimow D
Br J Soc Psychol; 2015 Jun; 54(2):220-35. PubMed ID: 24965741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanism of the better-than-average effect in moral issues: Asymmetrical causal attribution across moral (vs. immoral) contexts.
Han K; Kim MY
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Jun; 226():103575. PubMed ID: 35367637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Who attributes what to whom? Moral values and relational context shape causal attribution to the person or the situation.
Niemi L; Doris JM; Graham J
Cognition; 2023 Mar; 232():105332. PubMed ID: 36508991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Harming ourselves and defiling others: what determines a moral domain?
Chakroff A; Dungan J; Young L
PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e74434. PubMed ID: 24040245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. When ignorance is no excuse: Different roles for intent across moral domains.
Young L; Saxe R
Cognition; 2011 Aug; 120(2):202-14. PubMed ID: 21601839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Principles of moral accounting: How our intuitive moral sense balances rights and wrongs.
Johnson SGB; Ahn J
Cognition; 2021 Jan; 206():104467. PubMed ID: 33129053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intention matters to make you (im)moral: Positive-negative asymmetry in moral character evaluations.
Hirozawa PY; Karasawa M; Matsuo A
J Soc Psychol; 2020 Jul; 160(4):401-415. PubMed ID: 31423929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefining Harm.
Schein C; Gray K
Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2018 Feb; 22(1):32-70. PubMed ID: 28504021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Norm status, rather than norm type or blameworthiness, results in the side-effect effect.
Lin Z; Yu J; Zhu L
Psych J; 2019 Dec; 8(4):513-519. PubMed ID: 31144460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patterns of moral judgment derive from nonmoral psychological representations.
Cushman F; Young L
Cogn Sci; 2011 Aug; 35(6):1052-75. PubMed ID: 21790743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Causal Conceptions in Social Explanation and Moral Evaluation: A Historical Tour.
Alicke MD; Mandel DR; Hilton DJ; Gerstenberg T; Lagnado DA
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Nov; 10(6):790-812. PubMed ID: 26581736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The Recognition of Emotions, Empathy and Moral Judgment in the National Mental Health Survey in Colombia, 2015].
Matallana D; Gómez-Restrepo C; Ramirez P; Martínez NT; Rondon M
Rev Colomb Psiquiatr; 2016 Dec; 45 Suppl 1():96-104. PubMed ID: 27993262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Wrongness in different relationships: Relational context effects on moral judgment.
Simpson A; Laham SM; Fiske AP
J Soc Psychol; 2016; 156(6):594-609. PubMed ID: 26751010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Immoral Assumption Effect: Moralization Drives Negative Trait Attributions.
Meindl P; Johnson KM; Graham J
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2016 Apr; 42(4):540-53. PubMed ID: 26984017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The sadistic trait predicts minimization of intention and causal responsibility in moral judgment.
Trémolière B; Djeriouat H
Cognition; 2016 Jan; 146():158-71. PubMed ID: 26414248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Harm mediates the disgust-immorality link.
Schein C; Ritter RS; Gray K
Emotion; 2016 Sep; 16(6):862-76. PubMed ID: 27100369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Children's Judgments of Epistemic and Moral Agents: From Situations to Intentions.
Koenig MA; Tiberius V; Hamlin JK
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2019 May; 14(3):344-360. PubMed ID: 30629887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Manipulating Morality: Third-Party Intentions Alter Moral Judgments by Changing Causal Reasoning.
Phillips J; Shaw A
Cogn Sci; 2015 Aug; 39(6):1320-47. PubMed ID: 25382593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
