These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25490178)

  • 1. Assessment of bootstrap resampling performance for PET data.
    Markiewicz PJ; Reader AJ; Matthews JC
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(1):279-99. PubMed ID: 25490178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bootstrap methods for estimating PET image noise: experimental validation and an application to evaluation of image reconstruction algorithms.
    Ibaraki M; Matsubara K; Nakamura K; Yamaguchi H; Kinoshita T
    Ann Nucl Med; 2014 Feb; 28(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 24158790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of bootstrap resampling methods for 3-D PET imaging.
    Lartizien C; Aubin JB; Buvat I
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Jul; 29(7):1442-54. PubMed ID: 20409989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Respiratory motion correction for PET oncology applications using affine transformation of list mode data.
    Lamare F; Cresson T; Savean J; Cheze Le Rest C; Reader AJ; Visvikis D
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):121-40. PubMed ID: 17183132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of bias and variance in low-count OSEM list mode reconstruction.
    Jian Y; Planeta B; Carson RE
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(1):15-29. PubMed ID: 25479254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An approximate bootstrap technique for variance estimation in parametric images.
    Maitra R
    Med Image Anal; 1998 Dec; 2(4):379-93. PubMed ID: 10072204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Uncertainty analysis of MR-PET image registration for precision neuro-PET imaging.
    Markiewicz PJ; Matthews JC; Ashburner J; Cash DM; Thomas DL; De Vita E; Barnes A; Cardoso MJ; Modat M; Brown R; Thielemans K; da Costa-Luis C; Lopes Alves I; Gispert JD; Schmidt ME; Marsden P; Hammers A; Ourselin S; Barkhof F
    Neuroimage; 2021 May; 232():117821. PubMed ID: 33588030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of dynamic row-action maximum likelihood algorithm reconstruction for quantitative 15O brain PET.
    Ibaraki M; Sato K; Mizuta T; Kitamura K; Miura S; Sugawara S; Shinohara Y; Kinoshita T
    Ann Nucl Med; 2009 Sep; 23(7):627-38. PubMed ID: 19562437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Applications of the line-of-response probability density function resolution model in PET list mode reconstruction.
    Jian Y; Yao R; Mulnix T; Jin X; Carson RE
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(1):253-78. PubMed ID: 25490063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Least-squares dual characterization for ROI assessment in emission tomography.
    Ben Bouallègue F; Crouzet JF; Dubois A; Buvat I; Mariano-Goulart D
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jun; 58(12):4175-94. PubMed ID: 23715413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Joint estimation of dynamic PET images and temporal basis functions using fully 4D ML-EM.
    Reader AJ; Sureau FC; Comtat C; Trébossen R; Buvat I
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5455-74. PubMed ID: 17047263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Constructing reliable parametric images using enhanced GLLS for dynamic SPECT.
    Wen L; Eberl S; Fulham MJ; Feng DD; Bai J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Apr; 56(4):1117-26. PubMed ID: 19068420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reconstruction of 2D PET data with Monte Carlo generated system matrix for generalized natural pixels.
    Vandenberghe S; Staelens S; Byrne CL; Soares EJ; Lemahieu I; Glick SJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 51(12):3105-25. PubMed ID: 16757866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Direct reconstruction of kinetic parameter images from dynamic PET data.
    Kamasak ME; Bouman CA; Morris ED; Sauer K
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 May; 24(5):636-50. PubMed ID: 15889551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigation of realistic PET simulations incorporating tumor patient's specificity using anthropomorphic models: creation of an oncology database.
    Papadimitroulas P; Loudos G; Le Maitre A; Hatt M; Tixier F; Efthimiou N; Nikiforidis GC; Visvikis D; Kagadis GC
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):112506. PubMed ID: 24320465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Towards tracer dose reduction in PET studies: Simulation of dose reduction by retrospective randomized undersampling of list-mode data.
    Gatidis S; Würslin C; Seith F; Schäfer JF; la Fougère C; Nikolaou K; Schwenzer NF; Schmidt H
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2016; 19(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 26929936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of penalized likelihood image reconstruction for dynamic PET quantification.
    Wang G; Qi J
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Apr; 28(4):608-20. PubMed ID: 19211345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Task-oriented quantitative image reconstruction in emission tomography for single- and multi-subject studies.
    Verhaeghe J; Gravel P; Reader AJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Dec; 55(23):7263-85. PubMed ID: 21081825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Penalized maximum likelihood simultaneous longitudinal PET image reconstruction with difference-image priors.
    Ellis S; Reader AJ
    Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3001-3018. PubMed ID: 29697144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Including anatomical and functional information in MC simulation of PET and SPECT brain studies. Brain-VISET: a voxel-based iterative method.
    Marti-Fuster B; Esteban O; Thielemans K; Setoain X; Santos A; Ros D; Pavia J
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2014 Oct; 33(10):1931-8. PubMed ID: 24876110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.