These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

441 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25490435)

  • 21. Spatial transposition gradients in visual working memory.
    Rerko L; Oberauer K; Lin HY
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 23663175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Attentional capture does not depend on feature similarity, but on target-nontarget relations.
    Becker SI; Folk CL; Remington RW
    Psychol Sci; 2013 May; 24(5):634-47. PubMed ID: 23558547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Working memory encoding delays top-down attention to visual cortex.
    Scalf PE; Dux PE; Marois R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 23(9):2593-604. PubMed ID: 21281093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Selective maintenance in visual working memory does not require sustained visual attention.
    Hollingworth A; Maxcey-Richard AM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Aug; 39(4):1047-58. PubMed ID: 23067118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Probabilistic retro-cues do not determine state in visual working memory.
    Dube B; Lumsden A; Al-Aidroos N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):641-646. PubMed ID: 30276638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Only pre-cueing but no retro-cueing effects emerge with masked arrow cues.
    Janczyk M; Reuss H
    Conscious Cogn; 2016 May; 42():93-100. PubMed ID: 26998561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Examining the influence of a spatially irrelevant working memory load on attentional allocation.
    McDonnell GP; Dodd MD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Aug; 39(4):933-40. PubMed ID: 23477696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Symbolic control of visual attention: The role of working memory and attentional control settings.
    Pratt J; Hommel B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):835-45. PubMed ID: 14585008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bias corrected double judgment accuracy during spatial attention cueing: unmasked stimuli with non-predictive and semi-predictive cues.
    Pack W; Klein SA; Carney T
    Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():213-25. PubMed ID: 25130410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Awareness is necessary for extracting patterns in working memory but not for directing spatial attention.
    Hsieh PJ; Colas JT
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Oct; 38(5):1085-90. PubMed ID: 22564160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Location and color biases have different influences on selective attention.
    Fecteau JH; Korjoukov I; Roelfsema PR
    Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(9):996-1005. PubMed ID: 19324066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Is location cueing inherently superior to color cueing? Not if color is presented early enough.
    Kasten R; Navon D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):89-102. PubMed ID: 17420002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Asymmetrical access to color and location in visual working memory.
    Rajsic J; Wilson DE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Oct; 76(7):1902-13. PubMed ID: 25190322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Orienting attention to objects in visual short-term memory.
    Dell'Acqua R; Sessa P; Toffanin P; Luria R; Jolicoeur P
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(2):419-28. PubMed ID: 19804791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Different effects of color-based and location-based selection on visual working memory.
    Li Q; Saiki J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Feb; 77(2):450-63. PubMed ID: 25338537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Shifting attention among working memory representations: testing cue type, awareness, and strategic control.
    Berryhill ME; Richmond LL; Shay CS; Olson IR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(3):426-38. PubMed ID: 21846267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The attentional effects of single cues and color singletons on visual sensitivity.
    White AL; Lunau R; Carrasco M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):639-52. PubMed ID: 23875570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Refreshing memory traces: thinking of an item improves retrieval from visual working memory.
    Souza AS; Rerko L; Oberauer K
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():20-31. PubMed ID: 25557544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The time it takes to turn a memory into a template.
    Wilschut A; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    J Vis; 2013 Apr; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23603144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Forgotten but not gone: Retro-cue costs and benefits in a double-cueing paradigm suggest multiple states in visual short-term memory.
    van Moorselaar D; Olivers CN; Theeuwes J; Lamme VA; Sligte IG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1755-63. PubMed ID: 25867613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.