145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25490828)
1. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of orbital implant lengths on stress distributions in peri-implant surfaces].
Xing Z; Songling C; Yun Z; Liuying Q
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 32(5):484-7. PubMed ID: 25490828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The effect of mini-implant lengths on stress distributions in peri-implant surface].
Shan LH; Dong FS; Gong WW; Zhang X
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 29(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 21427895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.
Borie E; Orsi IA; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 26478969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical Comparison of Different Implant Inclinations and Cantilever Lengths in All-on-4 Treatment Concept by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Ozan O; Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 29340344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of stress induced by different lengths of osseointegrated implants in the anterior maxilla.
Lee JS; Lim YJ
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2013; 16(11):1143-9. PubMed ID: 22397684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments].
Jiang MY; Wen J; Xu SS; Liu TS; Sun HQ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 30630258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the stress distribution of bone tissue around porous titanium implant].
Liu TS; Gao R; Wei T; Sun HQ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 30630257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis.
Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical investigation of thread designs and interface conditions of zirconia and titanium dental implants with bone: three-dimensional numeric analysis.
Fuh LJ; Hsu JT; Huang HL; Chen MY; Shen YW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):e64-71. PubMed ID: 23527370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of the implant design on peri-implant bone stress and abutment micromovement: three-dimensional finite element analysis of original computer-aided design models.
Yamanishi Y; Yamaguchi S; Imazato S; Nakano T; Yatani H
J Periodontol; 2014 Sep; 85(9):e333-8. PubMed ID: 24835549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of Implant Length and Diameter, Bicortical Anchorage, and Sinus Augmentation on Bone Stress Distribution: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Moriwaki H; Yamaguchi S; Nakano T; Yamanishi Y; Imazato S; Yatani H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):e84-91. PubMed ID: 27447165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of Orbital Implant Length and Diameter on Stress Distribution: A Finite Element Analysis.
Xing Z; Chen LS; Peng W; Chen LJ
J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Mar; 28(2):e117-e120. PubMed ID: 28005657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Three dimensional finite element analysis of biomechanical distribution of dental implants with immediate loading].
Han XL; Liu ZW; Li YT
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Apr; 29(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 21598477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Selection of optimal expansion angle and length of an expandable implant in the osteoporotic mandible: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Xiao JR; Kong L; Chen YX; Han XX; Li YF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):e88-97. PubMed ID: 23527373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The biomechanical analysis of simulating implants in function under osteoporotic jawbone by comparing cylindrical, apical tapered, neck tapered, and expandable type implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Xiao JR; Li YF; Guan SM; Song L; Xu LX; Kong L
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):e273-81. PubMed ID: 21367505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting time-dependent remodeling of bone around immediately loaded dental implants with different designs.
Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Cehreli MC
Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jan; 32(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 19884034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the cylinder implant thread height and width: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Kong L; Hu K; Li D; Song Y; Yang J; Wu Z; Liu B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 18416414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
