289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25492455)
1. Cost-effectiveness of patient navigation to increase adherence with screening colonoscopy among minority individuals.
Ladabaum U; Mannalithara A; Jandorf L; Itzkowitz SH
Cancer; 2015 Apr; 121(7):1088-97. PubMed ID: 25492455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.
Sharaf RN; Ladabaum U
Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 108(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 23247579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer.
Dinh T; Ladabaum U; Alperin P; Caldwell C; Smith R; Levin TR
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Sep; 11(9):1158-66. PubMed ID: 23542330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrasting Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Under Commercial Insurance vs. Medicare.
Ladabaum U; Mannalithara A; Brill JV; Levin Z; Bundorf KM
Am J Gastroenterol; 2018 Dec; 113(12):1836-1847. PubMed ID: 29904156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-Effectiveness of Multitarget Stool DNA Testing vs Colonoscopy or Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Alaska Native People.
Redwood DG; Dinh TA; Kisiel JB; Borah BJ; Moriarty JP; Provost EM; Sacco FD; Tiesinga JJ; Ahlquist DA
Mayo Clin Proc; 2021 May; 96(5):1203-1217. PubMed ID: 33840520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of a Multitarget Stool DNA Test to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia.
Ladabaum U; Mannalithara A
Gastroenterology; 2016 Sep; 151(3):427-439.e6. PubMed ID: 27311556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of colorectal cancer screenings in a low- and middle-income country: example from Thailand.
Phisalprapa P; Supakankunti S; Chaiyakunapruk N
J Med Econ; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1351-1361. PubMed ID: 31560247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Colorectal cancer screening with blood-based biomarkers: cost-effectiveness of methylated septin 9 DNA versus current strategies.
Ladabaum U; Allen J; Wandell M; Ramsey S
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2013 Sep; 22(9):1567-76. PubMed ID: 23796793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population.
Frazier AL; Colditz GA; Fuchs CS; Kuntz KM
JAMA; 2000 Oct; 284(15):1954-61. PubMed ID: 11035892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a colonoscopy screening navigator program designed for Hispanic men.
Wilson FA; Villarreal R; Stimpson JP; Pagán JA
J Cancer Educ; 2015 Jun; 30(2):260-7. PubMed ID: 25168070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost effectiveness and projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening in France.
Hassan C; Benamouzig R; Spada C; Ponchon T; Zullo A; Saurin JC; Costamagna G
Endoscopy; 2011 Sep; 43(9):780-93. PubMed ID: 21623557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness analysis on screening for colorectal neoplasm and management of colorectal cancer in Asia.
Tsoi KK; Ng SS; Leung MC; Sung JJ
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Aug; 28(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 18638075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost effectiveness of CT colonography for UK NHS colorectal cancer screening of asymptomatic adults aged 60-69 years.
Lee D; Muston D; Sweet A; Cunningham C; Slater A; Lock K
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2010; 8(3):141-54. PubMed ID: 20369905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness simulation and analysis of colorectal cancer screening in Hong Kong Chinese population: comparison amongst colonoscopy, guaiac and immunologic fecal occult blood testing.
Wong CK; Lam CL; Wan YF; Fong DY
BMC Cancer; 2015 Oct; 15():705. PubMed ID: 26471036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Should colorectal cancer screening be considered in elderly persons without previous screening? A cost-effectiveness analysis.
van Hees F; Habbema JD; Meester RG; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; van Ballegooijen M; Zauber AG
Ann Intern Med; 2014 Jun; 160(11):750-9. PubMed ID: 24887616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness modeling of colorectal cancer: computed tomography colonography vs colonoscopy or fecal occult blood tests.
Lucidarme O; Cadi M; Berger G; Taieb J; Poynard T; Grenier P; Beresniak A
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1413-9. PubMed ID: 21444171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The cost-effectiveness of non-invasive stool-based colorectal cancer screening offerings from age 45 for a commercial and medicare population.
Ebner D; Kisiel J; Barnieh L; Sharma R; Smith NJ; Estes C; Vahdat V; Ozbay AB; Limburg P; Fendrick AM
J Med Econ; 2023; 26(1):1219-1226. PubMed ID: 37752872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness of a patient navigation intervention to increase colonoscopy screening among low-income adults in New Hampshire.
Rice K; Sharma K; Li C; Butterly L; Gersten J; DeGroff A
Cancer; 2019 Feb; 125(4):601-609. PubMed ID: 30548480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening using colonoscopy, fecal immunochemical test, and risk score.
Sekiguchi M; Igarashi A; Sakamoto T; Saito Y; Esaki M; Matsuda T
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Sep; 35(9):1555-1561. PubMed ID: 32167186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Colorectal cancer screening comparing no screening, immunochemical and guaiac fecal occult blood tests: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
van Rossum LG; van Rijn AF; Verbeek AL; van Oijen MG; Laheij RJ; Fockens P; Jansen JB; Adang EM; Dekker E
Int J Cancer; 2011 Apr; 128(8):1908-17. PubMed ID: 20589677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
