These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25492804)

  • 1. Testing group differences in brain functional connectivity: using correlations or partial correlations?
    Kim J; Wozniak JR; Mueller BA; Pan W
    Brain Connect; 2015 May; 5(4):214-31. PubMed ID: 25492804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of statistical tests for group differences in brain functional networks.
    Kim J; Wozniak JR; Mueller BA; Shen X; Pan W
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 101():681-94. PubMed ID: 25086298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Functional connectivity and structural covariance between regions of interest can be measured more accurately using multivariate distance correlation.
    Geerligs L; Cam-Can ; Henson RN
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jul; 135():16-31. PubMed ID: 27114055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Structurally-informed Bayesian functional connectivity analysis.
    Hinne M; Ambrogioni L; Janssen RJ; Heskes T; van Gerven MA
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86():294-305. PubMed ID: 24121202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Thresholding functional connectomes by means of mixture modeling.
    Bielczyk NZ; Walocha F; Ebel PW; Haak KV; Llera A; Buitelaar JK; Glennon JC; Beckmann CF
    Neuroimage; 2018 May; 171():402-414. PubMed ID: 29309896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bayesian modeling of dependence in brain connectivity data.
    Chen S; Xing Y; Kang J; Kochunov P; Hong LE
    Biostatistics; 2020 Apr; 21(2):269-286. PubMed ID: 30203093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Complementary contributions of concurrent EEG and fMRI connectivity for predicting structural connectivity.
    Wirsich J; Ridley B; Besson P; Jirsa V; Bénar C; Ranjeva JP; Guye M
    Neuroimage; 2017 Nov; 161():251-260. PubMed ID: 28842386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improved estimation of subject-level functional connectivity using full and partial correlation with empirical Bayes shrinkage.
    Mejia AF; Nebel MB; Barber AD; Choe AS; Pekar JJ; Caffo BS; Lindquist MA
    Neuroimage; 2018 May; 172():478-491. PubMed ID: 29391241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Highly adaptive tests for group differences in brain functional connectivity.
    Kim J; Pan W;
    Neuroimage Clin; 2015; 9():625-39. PubMed ID: 26740916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sparse Graphical Models for Functional Connectivity Networks: Best Methods and the Autocorrelation Issue.
    Zhu Y; Cribben I
    Brain Connect; 2018 Apr; 8(3):139-165. PubMed ID: 29634321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A connectionist approach to mapping the human connectome permits simulations of neural activity within an artificial brain.
    McNorgan C; Joanisse MF
    Brain Connect; 2014 Feb; 4(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 24117388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The structural-functional connectome and the default mode network of the human brain.
    Horn A; Ostwald D; Reisert M; Blankenburg F
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 102 Pt 1():142-51. PubMed ID: 24099851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of Directed Effective Connectivity from fMRI Functional Connectivity Hints at Asymmetries of Cortical Connectome.
    Gilson M; Moreno-Bote R; Ponce-Alvarez A; Ritter P; Deco G
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 Mar; 12(3):e1004762. PubMed ID: 26982185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relating whole-brain functional connectivity to self-reported negative emotion in a large sample of young adults using group regularized canonical correlation analysis.
    Tozzi L; Tuzhilina E; Glasser MF; Hastie TJ; Williams LM
    Neuroimage; 2021 Aug; 237():118137. PubMed ID: 33951512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Elucidating the complementarity of resting-state networks derived from dynamic [
    Ionescu TM; Amend M; Hafiz R; Biswal BB; Wehrl HF; Herfert K; Pichler BJ
    Neuroimage; 2021 Aug; 236():118045. PubMed ID: 33848625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of functional connectivity in fMRI data using stability selection-based sparse partial correlation with elastic net penalty.
    Ryali S; Chen T; Supekar K; Menon V
    Neuroimage; 2012 Feb; 59(4):3852-61. PubMed ID: 22155039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An Efficient and Reliable Statistical Method for Estimating Functional Connectivity in Large Scale Brain Networks Using Partial Correlation.
    Wang Y; Kang J; Kemmer PB; Guo Y
    Front Neurosci; 2016; 10():123. PubMed ID: 27242395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Integrative Bayesian analysis of brain functional networks incorporating anatomical knowledge.
    Higgins IA; Kundu S; Guo Y
    Neuroimage; 2018 Nov; 181():263-278. PubMed ID: 30017786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Structural Basis of Large-Scale Functional Connectivity in the Mouse.
    Grandjean J; Zerbi V; Balsters JH; Wenderoth N; Rudin M
    J Neurosci; 2017 Aug; 37(34):8092-8101. PubMed ID: 28716961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Construct validation of a DCM for resting state fMRI.
    Razi A; Kahan J; Rees G; Friston KJ
    Neuroimage; 2015 Feb; 106():1-14. PubMed ID: 25463471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.