172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25493038)
1. Is hand sewing comparable with stapling for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy? A meta-analysis.
Liu QX; Min JX; Deng XF; Dai JG
World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 20(45):17218-26. PubMed ID: 25493038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hand-sewn vs linearly stapled esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Deng XF; Liu QX; Zhou D; Min JX; Dai JG
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Apr; 21(15):4757-64. PubMed ID: 25914488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hand-sewn versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Honda M; Kuriyama A; Noma H; Nunobe S; Furukawa TA
Ann Surg; 2013 Feb; 257(2):238-48. PubMed ID: 23001084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Omentoplasty in the prevention of anastomotic leakage after oesophagectomy: a meta-analysis.
Chen L; Liu F; Wang K; Zou W
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Dec; 40(12):1635-40. PubMed ID: 25220157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Meta-Analysis of Two Different Methods for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis: Triangulating Versus Circular Stapling.
Hua XY; Dong SY; Zhang SG
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1143-1149. PubMed ID: 32315563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of outcomes following end-to-end hand-sewn and mechanical oesophagogastric anastomosis after oesophagectomy for carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Liu QX; Qiu Y; Deng XF; Min JX; Dai JG
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2015 Mar; 47(3):e118-23. PubMed ID: 25475947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Which Anastomotic Techniques Is the Best Choice for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy? A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.
Chen B; Xia P; Tang W; Huang S
J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Feb; 27(2):422-432. PubMed ID: 36417036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transthoracic Esophagectomy: Hand-sewn Versus Side-to-side Linear-stapled Versus Circular-stapled Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Schlottmann F; Angeramo CA; Bras Harriott C; Casas MA; Herbella FAM; Patti MG
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2022 Jun; 32(3):380-392. PubMed ID: 35583556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled in esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study.
Luechakiettisak P; Kasetsunthorn S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 May; 91(5):681-5. PubMed ID: 18672632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Omental reinforcement of the thoracic esophagogastric anastomosis: an analysis of leak and reintervention rates in patients undergoing planned and salvage esophagectomy.
Sepesi B; Swisher SG; Walsh GL; Correa A; Mehran RJ; Rice D; Roth J; Vaporciyan A; Hofstetter WL
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 144(5):1146-50. PubMed ID: 22939861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function.
Ramchandani NK; Kesler KA; Rogers JD; Valsangkar N; Stokes SM; Jalal SI
J Vis Exp; 2020 Apr; (158):. PubMed ID: 32364542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. End-to-end cervical esophagogastric anastomoses are associated with a higher number of strictures compared with end-to-side anastomoses.
Haverkamp L; van der Sluis PC; Verhage RJ; Siersema PD; Ruurda JP; van Hillegersberg R
J Gastrointest Surg; 2013 May; 17(5):872-6. PubMed ID: 23400509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Esophageal anastomosis following gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison of hand-sewn and stapling technique.
Takeyoshi I; Ohwada S; Ogawa T; Kawashima Y; Ohya T; Kawate S; Arai K; Nakasone Y; Morishita Y
Hepatogastroenterology; 2000; 47(34):1026-9. PubMed ID: 11020870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Propensity-matched analysis of three techniques for intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis.
Blackmon SH; Correa AM; Wynn B; Hofstetter WL; Martin LW; Mehran RJ; Rice DC; Swisher SG; Walsh GL; Roth JA; Vaporciyan AA
Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 May; 83(5):1805-13; discussion 1813. PubMed ID: 17462404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of stapled and hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomoses.
Beitler AL; Urschel JD
Am J Surg; 1998 Apr; 175(4):337-40. PubMed ID: 9568667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk Factors of Anastomosis Stricture After Esophagectomy and the Impact of Anastomosis Technique.
Na B; Kang CH; Na KJ; Park S; Park IK; Kim YT
Ann Thorac Surg; 2023 May; 115(5):1257-1264. PubMed ID: 36739069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Omentoplasty for esophagogastrostomy after esophagectomy.
Yuan Y; Zeng X; Hu Y; Xie T; Zhao Y
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Nov; 11():CD008446. PubMed ID: 23152259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Omentoplasty Decreases Leak Rate After Esophagectomy: a Meta-analysis.
Tuo G; Jin G; Pang Y; Wang W; Zhu X; Zhang H; Yang Y; Wu P; Zhu Z
J Gastrointest Surg; 2020 Jun; 24(6):1237-1243. PubMed ID: 31197696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. HAnd Suture Versus STApling for Closure of Loop Ileostomy (HASTA Trial): results of a multicenter randomized trial (DRKS00000040).
Löffler T; Rossion I; Bruckner T; Diener MK; Koch M; von Frankenberg M; Pochhammer J; Thomusch O; Kijak T; Simon T; Mihaljevic AL; Krüger M; Stein E; Prechtl G; Hodina R; Michal W; Strunk R; Henkel K; Bunse J; Jaschke G; Politt D; Heistermann HP; Fußer M; Lange C; Stamm A; Vosschulte A; Holzer R; Partecke LI; Burdzik E; Hug HM; Luntz SP; Kieser M; Büchler MW; Weitz J;
Ann Surg; 2012 Nov; 256(5):828-35; discussion 835-6. PubMed ID: 23095628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hand suture versus stapler for closure of loop ileostomy--a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Löffler T; Rossion I; Gooßen K; Saure D; Weitz J; Ulrich A; Büchler MW; Diener MK
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2015 Feb; 400(2):193-205. PubMed ID: 25539702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
