These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25493918)

  • 21. Exploratory factor analysis in Rehabilitation Psychology: a content analysis.
    Roberson RB; Elliott TR; Chang JE; Hill JN
    Rehabil Psychol; 2014 Nov; 59(4):429-438. PubMed ID: 25221958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Outlier removal and the relation with reporting errors and quality of psychological research.
    Bakker M; Wicherts JM
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e103360. PubMed ID: 25072606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Survey of editors and reviewers of high-impact psychology journals: statistical and research design problems in submitted manuscripts.
    Harris A; Reeder R; Hyun J
    J Psychol; 2011; 145(3):195-209. PubMed ID: 21560804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Inconsistencies between reported test statistics and p-values in two psychiatry journals.
    Berle D; Starcevic V
    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2007; 16(4):202-7. PubMed ID: 18188836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Statistics must be seen and scrutinized! Fundamental to the progress of medical science--yet neglected in medical journals].
    Taube A
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Dec; 99(51-52):5176-9. PubMed ID: 12572313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Does bad inference drive out good?
    Marozzi M
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2015 Jul; 42(7):727-33. PubMed ID: 25974387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Are studies reporting significant results more likely to be published?
    Koletsi D; Karagianni A; Pandis N; Makou M; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):632.e1-5; discussion 632-3. PubMed ID: 19892276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Descriptive and inferential statistical methods used in burns research.
    Al-Benna S; Al-Ajam Y; Way B; Steinstraesser L
    Burns; 2010 May; 36(3):343-6. PubMed ID: 19541424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The inexact use of Fisher's Exact Test in six major medical journals.
    McKinney WP; Young MJ; Hartz A; Lee MB
    JAMA; 1989 Jun; 261(23):3430-3. PubMed ID: 2724487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Analysis of common on statistical errors in biomedical journals].
    Shen J; Gou L; Tang J
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 May; 21(5):541-3. PubMed ID: 17578299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. No improvement in the reporting of clinical trial subgroup effects in high-impact general medical journals.
    Gabler NB; Duan N; Raneses E; Suttner L; Ciarametaro M; Cooney E; Dubois RW; Halpern SD; Kravitz RL
    Trials; 2016 Jul; 17(1):320. PubMed ID: 27423688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Errors in the Archives of Dermatology and the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology from January through December 2003.
    Neville JA; Lang W; Fleischer AB
    Arch Dermatol; 2006 Jun; 142(6):737-40. PubMed ID: 16785376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Misuse of statistical tests in Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology publications.
    Schatz P; Jay KA; McComb J; McLaughlin JR
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2005 Dec; 20(8):1053-9. PubMed ID: 16095871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Errors in medical literature: not a question of impact.
    Costantino G; Casazza G; Cernuschi G; Solbiati M; Birocchi S; Ceriani E; Duca P; Montano N
    Intern Emerg Med; 2013 Mar; 8(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 23179330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessment of statistical procedures used in papers in the Australian Veterinary Journal.
    McCance I
    Aust Vet J; 1995 Sep; 72(9):322-8. PubMed ID: 8585846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Statistics in the pharmacy literature.
    Lee CM; Soin HK; Einarson TR
    Ann Pharmacother; 2004 Sep; 38(9):1412-8. PubMed ID: 15199191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A survey of abstracts of high-impact clinical journals indicated most statistical methods presented are summary statistics.
    Taback N; Krzyzanowska MK
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Mar; 61(3):277-81. PubMed ID: 18226751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quality of reporting of dental survival analyses.
    Layton DM; Clarke M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Dec; 41(12):928-40. PubMed ID: 25195784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Smidt N; Rutjes AW; van der Windt DA; Ostelo RW; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PM; Bouter LM; de Vet HC
    Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 15770041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Statistical methods in anesthesia articles: an evaluation of two American journals during two six-month periods.
    Avram MJ; Shanks CA; Dykes MH; Ronai AK; Stiers WM
    Anesth Analg; 1985 Jun; 64(6):607-11. PubMed ID: 4003779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.