405 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25494362)
1. Adenoma detection in excellent versus good bowel preparation for colonoscopy.
Tholey DM; Shelton CE; Francis G; Anantharaman A; Frankel RA; Shah P; Coan A; Hegarty SE; Leiby BE; Kastenberg DM
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2015 Apr; 49(4):313-9. PubMed ID: 25494362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Good is better than excellent: bowel preparation quality and adenoma detection rates.
Calderwood AH; Thompson KD; Schroy PC; Lieberman DA; Jacobson BC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Mar; 81(3):691-699.e1. PubMed ID: 25708756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of fair bowel preparation quality on adenoma and serrated polyp detection: data from the New Hampshire colonoscopy registry by using a standardized preparation-quality rating.
Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Robinson CM; Goodrich M; Weiss JE
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Sep; 80(3):463-70. PubMed ID: 24818550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High-quality Bowel Preparation Is Required for Detection of Sessile Serrated Polyps.
Clark BT; Laine L
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Aug; 14(8):1155-62. PubMed ID: 27060426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Findings in the distal colorectum are not associated with proximal advanced serrated lesions.
Kahi CJ; Vemulapalli KC; Snover DC; Abdel Jawad KH; Cummings OW; Rex DK
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2015 Feb; 13(2):345-51. PubMed ID: 25083562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Efficacy of Split-Dose Bowel Preparations for Polyp Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Zawaly K; Rumbolt C; Abou-Setta AM; Neilson C; Rabbani R; Zarychanski R; Singh H
Am J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jun; 114(6):884-892. PubMed ID: 30865011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What level of bowel prep quality requires early repeat colonoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of preparation quality on adenoma detection rate.
Clark BT; Rustagi T; Laine L
Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Nov; 109(11):1714-23; quiz 1724. PubMed ID: 25135006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A novel method with significant impact on adenoma detection: combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy.
Yen AW; Leung JW; Leung FW
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):944-8. PubMed ID: 23473001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection rate and proximal shift tendency of adenomas and serrated polyps: a retrospective study of 62,560 colonoscopies.
Chen S; Sun K; Chao K; Sun Y; Hong L; Weng Z; Cui Y; Chen M; Zhang S
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Feb; 33(2):131-139. PubMed ID: 29282495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Different bowel preparation schedule leads to different diagnostic yield of proximal and nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasm at screening colonoscopy in average-risk population.
Chiu HM; Lin JT; Lee YC; Liang JT; Shun CT; Wang HP; Wu MS
Dis Colon Rectum; 2011 Dec; 54(12):1570-7. PubMed ID: 22067187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adenoma detection rate in high-risk patients differs from that in average-risk patients.
Sanaka MR; Rai T; Navaneethan U; Gohel TD; Podugu A; Thota PN; Lopez R; Kiran RP; Burke CA
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jan; 83(1):172-8. PubMed ID: 26024584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modifiable endoscopic factors that influence the adenoma detection rate in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies.
Jover R; Zapater P; Polanía E; Bujanda L; Lanas A; Hermo JA; Cubiella J; Ono A; González-Méndez Y; Peris A; Pellisé M; Seoane A; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Ponce M; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Fernández-Díez S; Arenas J; Sopeña F; de-Castro L; Vega-Villaamil P; Rodríguez-Soler M; Carballo F; Salas D; Morillas JD; Andreu M; Quintero E; Castells A;
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):381-389.e1. PubMed ID: 23218945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy.
Chokshi RV; Hovis CE; Hollander T; Early DS; Wang JS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jun; 75(6):1197-203. PubMed ID: 22381531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors Associated With Shorter Colonoscopy Surveillance Intervals for Patients With Low-Risk Colorectal Adenomas and Effects on Outcome.
Anderson JC; Baron JA; Ahnen DJ; Barry EL; Bostick RM; Burke CA; Bresalier RS; Church TR; Cole BF; Cruz-Correa M; Kim AS; Mott LA; Sandler RS; Robertson DJ
Gastroenterology; 2017 Jun; 152(8):1933-1943.e5. PubMed ID: 28219690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Advances in bowel preparation for colonoscopy.
Cohen LB
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2015 Apr; 25(2):183-97. PubMed ID: 25839681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Timed screening colonoscopy: a randomized trial of two colonoscopic withdrawal techniques.
Coghlan E; Laferrere L; Zenon E; Marini JM; Rainero G; San Roman A; Posadas Martinez ML; Nadales A
Surg Endosc; 2020 Mar; 34(3):1200-1205. PubMed ID: 31144121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Weiss JE; Robinson CM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1188-1194. PubMed ID: 28153571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection rates of premalignant polyps during screening colonoscopy: time to revise quality standards?
Ross WA; Thirumurthi S; Lynch PM; Rashid A; Pande M; Shafi MA; Lee JH; Raju GS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Mar; 81(3):567-74. PubMed ID: 25583558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of quality of segmental bowel preparation on adenoma detection rate.
Guo R; Wang YJ; Liu M; Ge J; Zhang LY; Ma L; Huang WY; Zhai HH
BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):119. PubMed ID: 31286888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Split-dose preparation for colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a randomised controlled trial in an organised screening programme.
Radaelli F; Paggi S; Hassan C; Senore C; Fasoli R; Anderloni A; Buffoli F; Savarese MF; Spinzi G; Rex DK; Repici A
Gut; 2017 Feb; 66(2):270-277. PubMed ID: 26657900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
