These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

403 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25494362)

  • 1. Adenoma detection in excellent versus good bowel preparation for colonoscopy.
    Tholey DM; Shelton CE; Francis G; Anantharaman A; Frankel RA; Shah P; Coan A; Hegarty SE; Leiby BE; Kastenberg DM
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2015 Apr; 49(4):313-9. PubMed ID: 25494362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Good is better than excellent: bowel preparation quality and adenoma detection rates.
    Calderwood AH; Thompson KD; Schroy PC; Lieberman DA; Jacobson BC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Mar; 81(3):691-699.e1. PubMed ID: 25708756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of fair bowel preparation quality on adenoma and serrated polyp detection: data from the New Hampshire colonoscopy registry by using a standardized preparation-quality rating.
    Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Robinson CM; Goodrich M; Weiss JE
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Sep; 80(3):463-70. PubMed ID: 24818550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High-quality Bowel Preparation Is Required for Detection of Sessile Serrated Polyps.
    Clark BT; Laine L
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Aug; 14(8):1155-62. PubMed ID: 27060426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Findings in the distal colorectum are not associated with proximal advanced serrated lesions.
    Kahi CJ; Vemulapalli KC; Snover DC; Abdel Jawad KH; Cummings OW; Rex DK
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2015 Feb; 13(2):345-51. PubMed ID: 25083562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Efficacy of Split-Dose Bowel Preparations for Polyp Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Zawaly K; Rumbolt C; Abou-Setta AM; Neilson C; Rabbani R; Zarychanski R; Singh H
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jun; 114(6):884-892. PubMed ID: 30865011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What level of bowel prep quality requires early repeat colonoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of preparation quality on adenoma detection rate.
    Clark BT; Rustagi T; Laine L
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Nov; 109(11):1714-23; quiz 1724. PubMed ID: 25135006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A novel method with significant impact on adenoma detection: combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy.
    Yen AW; Leung JW; Leung FW
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):944-8. PubMed ID: 23473001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection rate and proximal shift tendency of adenomas and serrated polyps: a retrospective study of 62,560 colonoscopies.
    Chen S; Sun K; Chao K; Sun Y; Hong L; Weng Z; Cui Y; Chen M; Zhang S
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Feb; 33(2):131-139. PubMed ID: 29282495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Different bowel preparation schedule leads to different diagnostic yield of proximal and nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasm at screening colonoscopy in average-risk population.
    Chiu HM; Lin JT; Lee YC; Liang JT; Shun CT; Wang HP; Wu MS
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2011 Dec; 54(12):1570-7. PubMed ID: 22067187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adenoma detection rate in high-risk patients differs from that in average-risk patients.
    Sanaka MR; Rai T; Navaneethan U; Gohel TD; Podugu A; Thota PN; Lopez R; Kiran RP; Burke CA
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jan; 83(1):172-8. PubMed ID: 26024584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modifiable endoscopic factors that influence the adenoma detection rate in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies.
    Jover R; Zapater P; Polanía E; Bujanda L; Lanas A; Hermo JA; Cubiella J; Ono A; González-Méndez Y; Peris A; Pellisé M; Seoane A; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Ponce M; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Fernández-Díez S; Arenas J; Sopeña F; de-Castro L; Vega-Villaamil P; Rodríguez-Soler M; Carballo F; Salas D; Morillas JD; Andreu M; Quintero E; Castells A;
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):381-389.e1. PubMed ID: 23218945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy.
    Chokshi RV; Hovis CE; Hollander T; Early DS; Wang JS
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jun; 75(6):1197-203. PubMed ID: 22381531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors Associated With Shorter Colonoscopy Surveillance Intervals for Patients With Low-Risk Colorectal Adenomas and Effects on Outcome.
    Anderson JC; Baron JA; Ahnen DJ; Barry EL; Bostick RM; Burke CA; Bresalier RS; Church TR; Cole BF; Cruz-Correa M; Kim AS; Mott LA; Sandler RS; Robertson DJ
    Gastroenterology; 2017 Jun; 152(8):1933-1943.e5. PubMed ID: 28219690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Advances in bowel preparation for colonoscopy.
    Cohen LB
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2015 Apr; 25(2):183-97. PubMed ID: 25839681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Timed screening colonoscopy: a randomized trial of two colonoscopic withdrawal techniques.
    Coghlan E; Laferrere L; Zenon E; Marini JM; Rainero G; San Roman A; Posadas Martinez ML; Nadales A
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Mar; 34(3):1200-1205. PubMed ID: 31144121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
    Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Weiss JE; Robinson CM
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1188-1194. PubMed ID: 28153571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection rates of premalignant polyps during screening colonoscopy: time to revise quality standards?
    Ross WA; Thirumurthi S; Lynch PM; Rashid A; Pande M; Shafi MA; Lee JH; Raju GS
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Mar; 81(3):567-74. PubMed ID: 25583558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of quality of segmental bowel preparation on adenoma detection rate.
    Guo R; Wang YJ; Liu M; Ge J; Zhang LY; Ma L; Huang WY; Zhai HH
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):119. PubMed ID: 31286888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Split-dose preparation for colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a randomised controlled trial in an organised screening programme.
    Radaelli F; Paggi S; Hassan C; Senore C; Fasoli R; Anderloni A; Buffoli F; Savarese MF; Spinzi G; Rex DK; Repici A
    Gut; 2017 Feb; 66(2):270-277. PubMed ID: 26657900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.