405 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25494362)
41. Detection rate and predictive factors of sessile serrated polyps in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy).
Zorzi M; Senore C; Da Re F; Barca A; Bonelli LA; Cannizzaro R; de Pretis G; Di Furia L; Di Giulio E; Mantellini P; Naldoni C; Sassatelli R; Rex DK; Zappa M; Hassan C;
Gut; 2017 Jul; 66(7):1233-1240. PubMed ID: 26896459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Relationship between the endoscopic withdrawal time and adenoma/polyp detection rate in individual colonic segments: a KASID multicenter study.
Jung Y; Joo YE; Kim HG; Jeon SR; Cha JM; Yang HJ; Kim JW; Lee J; Kim KO; Song HK; Hwangbo Y; Shin JE
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):523-530. PubMed ID: 30267654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. [Distribution characteristics and risk factors of colorectal adenomas].
Zhou H; Shen Z; Zhao J; Zhou Z; Xu Y
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Jun; 21(6):678-684. PubMed ID: 29968244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Yield of repeat forward-view examination of the right side of the colon in screening and surveillance colonoscopy.
Clark BT; Parikh ND; Laine L
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jul; 84(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 26769408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The mean number of adenomas per procedure should become the gold standard to measure the neoplasia yield of colonoscopy: a population-based cohort study.
Denis B; Sauleau EA; Gendre I; Exbrayat C; Piette C; Dancourt V; Foll Y; Ait Hadad H; Bailly L; Perrin P
Dig Liver Dis; 2014 Feb; 46(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 24054769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Prolonged cecal insertion time is associated with decreased adenoma detection.
von Renteln D; Robertson DJ; Bensen S; Pohl H
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Mar; 85(3):574-580. PubMed ID: 27590962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Adenoma detection in patients undergoing a comprehensive colonoscopy screening.
Raju GS; Vadyala V; Slack R; Krishna SG; Ross WA; Lynch PM; Bresalier RS; Hawk E; Stroehlein JR
Cancer Med; 2013 Jun; 2(3):391-402. PubMed ID: 23930215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Colonoscopy conversion after flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: results from the UK Bowel Scope Screening Programme.
Siau K; Yew AC; Ishaq S; Jewes S; Shetty S; Brookes M; Veitch A; McKaig B; Murugananthan A
Colorectal Dis; 2018 Jun; 20(6):502-508. PubMed ID: 29205835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Impact of Single- vs. Split-Dose Low-Volume Bowel Preparations on Bowel Movement Kinetics, Patient Inconvenience, and Polyp Detection: A Prospective Trial.
Horton N; Garber A; Hasson H; Lopez R; Burke CA
Am J Gastroenterol; 2016 Sep; 111(9):1330-7. PubMed ID: 27377521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Rates of Suboptimal Preparation for Colonoscopy Differ Markedly Between Providers: Impact on Adenoma Detection Rates.
Mahadev S; Green PH; Lebwohl B
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2015 Oct; 49(9):746-50. PubMed ID: 25144900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Personal instruction for patients before colonoscopies could improve bowel preparation quality and increase detection of colorectal adenomas.
Su H; Lao Y; Wu J; Liu H; Wang C; Liu K; Wei N; Lin W; Jiang G; Tai W; Guo C; Wang Y
Ann Palliat Med; 2020 Mar; 9(2):420-427. PubMed ID: 32233640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Enhanced Patient Education for Colonic Polyp and Adenoma Detection: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Tian X; Xu LL; Liu XL; Chen WQ
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Jun; 8(6):e17372. PubMed ID: 32347798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Adenoma Detection Rate in Asymptomatic Patients with Positive Fecal Immunochemical Tests.
Kligman E; Li W; Eckert GJ; Kahi C
Dig Dis Sci; 2018 May; 63(5):1167-1172. PubMed ID: 29468377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Rates of synchronous advanced neoplasia and colorectal cancer in patients with colonic serrated lesions.
Djinbachian R; Lafontaine ML; Dufault T; Medawar E; Boivin M; Bouin M; von Renteln D
Surg Endosc; 2023 Jul; 37(7):5150-5157. PubMed ID: 36944739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Effect of I-scan Electronic Chromoendoscopy on Detection of Adenomas During Colonoscopy.
Kidambi TD; Terdiman JP; El-Nachef N; Singh A; Kattah MG; Lee JK
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Mar; 17(4):701-708.e1. PubMed ID: 29935326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Longer Withdrawal Time Is More Important than Excellent Bowel Preparation in Colonoscopy of Adequate Bowel Preparation.
Choi JM; Seo JY; Lee J; Han YM; Jin EH; Bae JH; Lim JH
Dig Dis Sci; 2021 Apr; 66(4):1168-1174. PubMed ID: 32419115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Efficacy of oral sulfate tablets for bowel preparation and adenoma detection rate.
Song JH; Bae JH; Yim JY
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2023 Mar; 38(3):410-415. PubMed ID: 36453642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Patient and Physician Factors Associated with Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Lesion Detection Rates.
Zhou MJ; Lebwohl B; Krigel A
Dig Dis Sci; 2020 Nov; 65(11):3123-3131. PubMed ID: 32564206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. High-definition chromocolonoscopy vs. high-definition white light colonoscopy for average-risk colorectal cancer screening.
Kahi CJ; Anderson JC; Waxman I; Kessler WR; Imperiale TF; Li X; Rex DK
Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Jun; 105(6):1301-7. PubMed ID: 20179689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Improving the quality and acceptance of colonoscopy preparation by reinforced patient education with short message service: results from a randomized, multicenter study (PERICLES-II).
Walter B; Klare P; Strehle K; Aschenbeck J; Ludwig L; Dikopoulos N; Mayr M; Neu B; Hann A; Mayer B; Meining A; von Delius S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):506-513.e4. PubMed ID: 30138612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
