These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25494565)
21. Optimizing health information technology's role in enabling comparative effectiveness research. Navathe AS; Conway PH Am J Manag Care; 2010 Dec; 16(12 Suppl HIT):SP44-7. PubMed ID: 21314220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Science and the stiumulus. Medicine under the microscope. Marshall E Science; 2009 Nov; 326(5957):1183-5. PubMed ID: 19965447 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Citation impact of NHLBI R01 grants funded through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act as compared to R01 grants funded through a standard payline. Danthi NS; Wu CO; DiMichele DM; Hoots WK; Lauer MS Circ Res; 2015 Feb; 116(5):784-8. PubMed ID: 25722441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Healthcare information technology. ; Lee A Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2012 Jan; ():1-42. PubMed ID: 22413189 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The promise and future of comparative effectiveness research. Clancy CM J Nurs Care Qual; 2010; 25(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 20010250 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. States start to squirm. Without federal help, states warn deficits will grow. Evans M Mod Healthc; 2010 Jul; 40(27):12-3. PubMed ID: 20666209 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Weighing the options. Nordenberg T Nature; 2010 Aug; 466(7309):1010-1. PubMed ID: 20928944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. It is important to note that RWD will never replace the more traditional and more robust RCT data; however, the emerging trend is to incorporate data that are more generalizable. Introduction. Mullins CD; Sanchez RJ J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl A):S03-4. PubMed ID: 22074667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparative Effectiveness Research in Pediatric Infectious Diseases. Hersh AL; Pavia AT J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc; 2015 Mar; 4(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 26407354 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The impact of comparative effectiveness on U.S. healthcare providers. Bigalke JT Healthc Financ Manage; 2009 Oct; 63(10):74-8. PubMed ID: 19810656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. CMS incentive payments for meaningful use of health care IT for radiologists: will they fund the needed change? Khorasani R J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 Feb; 8(2):139-40. PubMed ID: 21292191 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. What does US$1.1 billion buy? An investment in the future. Simpson LA J Comp Eff Res; 2014 Nov; 3(6):561-3. PubMed ID: 25494559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. 'Huge potential' for EHRs and comparative effectiveness. McKinney M Hosp Health Netw; 2010 Apr; 84(4):41-2. PubMed ID: 20464840 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Making the top-tech list. DerGurahian J Mod Healthc; 2009 Jul; 39(29):26-8. PubMed ID: 19658234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Healthcare ROI. Medical research, comparative-effectiveness studies deserve investment. May D Mod Healthc; 2013 Feb; 43(8):23. PubMed ID: 23516786 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Identifying and eliminating the roadblocks to comparative-effectiveness research. Martin DF; Maguire MG; Fine SL N Engl J Med; 2010 Jul; 363(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 20519677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Comments on 'Comparative effectiveness research: Policy context, methods development and research infrastructure'. Morton SC Stat Med; 2010 Aug; 29(19):1989-90; discussion 1996-7. PubMed ID: 20683889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Science and the stiumulus. Shovel-ready science drives DOE decisions. Mervis J Science; 2009 Nov; 326(5957):1177-8. PubMed ID: 19965444 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]