216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25494569)
1. Public perceptions of comparative effectiveness research and use of evidence in healthcare decision-making.
Cornwell D; Hu M; Esposito D
J Comp Eff Res; 2014 Nov; 3(6):623-34. PubMed ID: 25494569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differences among consumer segments with regard to perceptions of comparative effectiveness research.
Williams SS; Frost SL
J Comp Eff Res; 2014 Nov; 3(6):617-22. PubMed ID: 25494568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The case for a comparative, value-based alternative to the patient-centered outcomes research model for comparative effectiveness research.
Marko NF; Weil RJ
Neurosurg Focus; 2012 Jul; 33(1):E8. PubMed ID: 22746240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Translating comparative effectiveness into practice: the case of diabetes medications.
Shah ND; Mullan RJ; Breslin M; Yawn BP; Ting HH; Montori VM
Med Care; 2010 Jun; 48(6 Suppl):S153-8. PubMed ID: 20473211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Attitudes toward comparative effectiveness research and patient engagement among reproductive health clinicians.
Kohn J; Unger Z; Dolatshahi J; Simons H; Rein A
J Comp Eff Res; 2017 Jun; 6(4):337-345. PubMed ID: 28621553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The methods of comparative effectiveness research.
Sox HC; Goodman SN
Annu Rev Public Health; 2012 Apr; 33():425-45. PubMed ID: 22224891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative effectiveness research in the U.S.A.: when will there be an impact on healthcare decision-making?
Westrich KD; Wilhelm JA; Schur CL
J Comp Eff Res; 2016 Mar; 5(2):207-16. PubMed ID: 26844982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Shared decision-making and interprofessional collaboration in mental healthcare: a qualitative study exploring perceptions of barriers and facilitators.
Chong WW; Aslani P; Chen TF
J Interprof Care; 2013 Sep; 27(5):373-9. PubMed ID: 23679672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A tall order on a tight timeframe: stakeholder perspectives on comparative effectiveness research using electronic clinical data.
Holve E; Lopez MH; Scott L; Segal C
J Comp Eff Res; 2012 Sep; 1(5):441-51. PubMed ID: 24236421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perspectives on evidence-based practice from consumers in the US public mental health system.
Tanenbaum SJ
J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):699-706. PubMed ID: 19018898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Defining comparative effectiveness research: the importance of getting it right.
Sox HC
Med Care; 2010 Jun; 48(6 Suppl):S7-8. PubMed ID: 20473202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research: enhancing uptake and use by patients, clinicians and payers.
Schumock GT; Pickard AS
J Comp Eff Res; 2018 Feb; 7(2):177-180. PubMed ID: 29464965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: implications for clinical practice and health care policy.
Ahmed S; Berzon RA; Revicki DA; Lenderking WR; Moinpour CM; Basch E; Reeve BB; Wu AW;
Med Care; 2012 Dec; 50(12):1060-70. PubMed ID: 22922434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Translating comparative effectiveness research into Medicaid payment policy: views from medical and pharmacy directors.
Weissman JS; Westrich K; Hargraves JL; Pearson SD; Dubois R; Emond S; Olufajo OA
J Comp Eff Res; 2015 Mar; 4(2):79-88. PubMed ID: 25825839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multiple perspectives on shared decision-making and interprofessional collaboration in mental healthcare.
Chong WW; Aslani P; Chen TF
J Interprof Care; 2013 May; 27(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 23421345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A framework for assessing the value of diagnostic imaging in the era of comparative effectiveness research.
Gazelle GS; Kessler L; Lee DW; McGinn T; Menzin J; Neumann PJ; van Amerongen D; White LA;
Radiology; 2011 Dec; 261(3):692-8. PubMed ID: 22095993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evidence that consumers are skeptical about evidence-based health care.
Carman KL; Maurer M; Yegian JM; Dardess P; McGee J; Evers M; Marlo KO
Health Aff (Millwood); 2010 Jul; 29(7):1400-6. PubMed ID: 20522522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative effectiveness research: decision-based evidence.
Kowalski CJ; Mrdjenovich AJ
Perspect Biol Med; 2014; 57(2):224-48. PubMed ID: 25544326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Practical guide to understanding Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER).
Neely JG; Sharon JD; Graboyes EM; Paniello RC; Nussenbaum B; Grindler DJ; Dassopoulos T;
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Dec; 149(6):804-12. PubMed ID: 24098005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Increasing uptake of comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research among stakeholders: insights from conference discussion.
Law E; Harrington R; Alexander GC; Saha S; Oehrlein E; Perfetto EM
J Comp Eff Res; 2018 Feb; 7(2):181-191. PubMed ID: 29465252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
