These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25494569)

  • 1. Public perceptions of comparative effectiveness research and use of evidence in healthcare decision-making.
    Cornwell D; Hu M; Esposito D
    J Comp Eff Res; 2014 Nov; 3(6):623-34. PubMed ID: 25494569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differences among consumer segments with regard to perceptions of comparative effectiveness research.
    Williams SS; Frost SL
    J Comp Eff Res; 2014 Nov; 3(6):617-22. PubMed ID: 25494568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The case for a comparative, value-based alternative to the patient-centered outcomes research model for comparative effectiveness research.
    Marko NF; Weil RJ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2012 Jul; 33(1):E8. PubMed ID: 22746240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Translating comparative effectiveness into practice: the case of diabetes medications.
    Shah ND; Mullan RJ; Breslin M; Yawn BP; Ting HH; Montori VM
    Med Care; 2010 Jun; 48(6 Suppl):S153-8. PubMed ID: 20473211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attitudes toward comparative effectiveness research and patient engagement among reproductive health clinicians.
    Kohn J; Unger Z; Dolatshahi J; Simons H; Rein A
    J Comp Eff Res; 2017 Jun; 6(4):337-345. PubMed ID: 28621553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The methods of comparative effectiveness research.
    Sox HC; Goodman SN
    Annu Rev Public Health; 2012 Apr; 33():425-45. PubMed ID: 22224891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative effectiveness research in the U.S.A.: when will there be an impact on healthcare decision-making?
    Westrich KD; Wilhelm JA; Schur CL
    J Comp Eff Res; 2016 Mar; 5(2):207-16. PubMed ID: 26844982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shared decision-making and interprofessional collaboration in mental healthcare: a qualitative study exploring perceptions of barriers and facilitators.
    Chong WW; Aslani P; Chen TF
    J Interprof Care; 2013 Sep; 27(5):373-9. PubMed ID: 23679672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A tall order on a tight timeframe: stakeholder perspectives on comparative effectiveness research using electronic clinical data.
    Holve E; Lopez MH; Scott L; Segal C
    J Comp Eff Res; 2012 Sep; 1(5):441-51. PubMed ID: 24236421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perspectives on evidence-based practice from consumers in the US public mental health system.
    Tanenbaum SJ
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):699-706. PubMed ID: 19018898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Defining comparative effectiveness research: the importance of getting it right.
    Sox HC
    Med Care; 2010 Jun; 48(6 Suppl):S7-8. PubMed ID: 20473202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research: enhancing uptake and use by patients, clinicians and payers.
    Schumock GT; Pickard AS
    J Comp Eff Res; 2018 Feb; 7(2):177-180. PubMed ID: 29464965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: implications for clinical practice and health care policy.
    Ahmed S; Berzon RA; Revicki DA; Lenderking WR; Moinpour CM; Basch E; Reeve BB; Wu AW;
    Med Care; 2012 Dec; 50(12):1060-70. PubMed ID: 22922434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Translating comparative effectiveness research into Medicaid payment policy: views from medical and pharmacy directors.
    Weissman JS; Westrich K; Hargraves JL; Pearson SD; Dubois R; Emond S; Olufajo OA
    J Comp Eff Res; 2015 Mar; 4(2):79-88. PubMed ID: 25825839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiple perspectives on shared decision-making and interprofessional collaboration in mental healthcare.
    Chong WW; Aslani P; Chen TF
    J Interprof Care; 2013 May; 27(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 23421345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A framework for assessing the value of diagnostic imaging in the era of comparative effectiveness research.
    Gazelle GS; Kessler L; Lee DW; McGinn T; Menzin J; Neumann PJ; van Amerongen D; White LA;
    Radiology; 2011 Dec; 261(3):692-8. PubMed ID: 22095993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence that consumers are skeptical about evidence-based health care.
    Carman KL; Maurer M; Yegian JM; Dardess P; McGee J; Evers M; Marlo KO
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2010 Jul; 29(7):1400-6. PubMed ID: 20522522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative effectiveness research: decision-based evidence.
    Kowalski CJ; Mrdjenovich AJ
    Perspect Biol Med; 2014; 57(2):224-48. PubMed ID: 25544326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Practical guide to understanding Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER).
    Neely JG; Sharon JD; Graboyes EM; Paniello RC; Nussenbaum B; Grindler DJ; Dassopoulos T;
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Dec; 149(6):804-12. PubMed ID: 24098005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Increasing uptake of comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research among stakeholders: insights from conference discussion.
    Law E; Harrington R; Alexander GC; Saha S; Oehrlein E; Perfetto EM
    J Comp Eff Res; 2018 Feb; 7(2):181-191. PubMed ID: 29465252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.