These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25494569)

  • 41. Methodological recommendations for comparative research on the treatment of chronic wounds.
    Sonnad SS; Goldsack JC; Mohr P; Tunis S
    J Wound Care; 2013 Sep; 22(9):470-80. PubMed ID: 24005781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Making sense of the evidence using comparative effectiveness to guide clinical decision making, policy and coverage.
    Carlos RC; Cronin P
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Sep; 18(9):1065-6. PubMed ID: 21820633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. It is important to note that RWD will never replace the more traditional and more robust RCT data; however, the emerging trend is to incorporate data that are more generalizable. Introduction.
    Mullins CD; Sanchez RJ
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl A):S03-4. PubMed ID: 22074667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research.
    Reeve BB; Wyrwich KW; Wu AW; Velikova G; Terwee CB; Snyder CF; Schwartz C; Revicki DA; Moinpour CM; McLeod LD; Lyons JC; Lenderking WR; Hinds PS; Hays RD; Greenhalgh J; Gershon R; Feeny D; Fayers PM; Cella D; Brundage M; Ahmed S; Aaronson NK; Butt Z
    Qual Life Res; 2013 Oct; 22(8):1889-905. PubMed ID: 23288613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The Electronic Data Methods (EDM) forum for comparative effectiveness research (CER).
    Holve E; Segal C; Lopez MH; Rein A; Johnson BH
    Med Care; 2012 Jul; 50 Suppl():S7-10. PubMed ID: 22692262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Patient participation in clinical decision-making in nursing: A comparative study of nurses' and patients' perceptions.
    Florin J; Ehrenberg A; Ehnfors M
    J Clin Nurs; 2006 Dec; 15(12):1498-508. PubMed ID: 17118072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Shared decision making in public mental health care: perspectives from consumers living with severe mental illness.
    Woltmann EM; Whitley R
    Psychiatr Rehabil J; 2010; 34(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 20615842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. An introduction to comparative effectiveness research.
    Marko NF; Weil RJ
    Neurosurgery; 2012 Feb; 70(2):425-34; discussion 434. PubMed ID: 21849923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Understanding An Informed Public's Views On The Role Of Evidence In Making Health Care Decisions.
    Carman KL; Maurer M; Mangrum R; Yang M; Ginsburg M; Sofaer S; Gold MR; Pathak-Sen E; Gilmore D; Richmond J; Siegel J
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2016 Apr; 35(4):566-74. PubMed ID: 27044953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Oncology comparative effectiveness research: a multistakeholder perspective on principles for conduct and reporting.
    Ramsey SD; Sullivan SD; Reed SD; Tina Shih YC; Schaecher K; Dhanda R; Patt D; Pendergrass K; Walker M; Malin J; Schwartzberg L; Neumann K; Yu E; Ravelo A; Small A
    Oncologist; 2013 Jun; 18(6):760-7. PubMed ID: 23650020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Health beliefs and expectations implicit in decision-making in a Hong Kong Chinese surgical population.
    Henderson A; Chien WT
    J Clin Nurs; 2007 Mar; 16(3):603-9. PubMed ID: 17335536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Factors associated with evidence-based decision-making among patients and providers.
    Williams N; Kogan R
    J Comp Eff Res; 2019 Jul; 8(9):709-719. PubMed ID: 31290682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Insights from a conference on implementing comparative effectiveness research through shared decision-making.
    Politi MC; Clayman ML; Fagerlin A; Studts JL; Montori V
    J Comp Eff Res; 2013 Jan; 2(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 23430243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Methodological standards and patient-centeredness in comparative effectiveness research: the PCORI perspective.
    Methodology Committee of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI)
    JAMA; 2012 Apr; 307(15):1636-40. PubMed ID: 22511692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A model for incorporating patient and stakeholder voices in a learning health care network: Washington State's Comparative Effectiveness Research Translation Network.
    Devine EB; Alfonso-Cristancho R; Devlin A; Edwards TC; Farrokhi ET; Kessler L; Lavallee DC; Patrick DL; Sullivan SD; Tarczy-Hornoch P; Yanez ND; Flum DR;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8 Suppl):S122-9. PubMed ID: 23849146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Stakeholder assessment of comparative effectiveness research needs for Medicaid populations.
    Fischer MA; Allen-Coleman C; Farrell SF; Schneeweiss S
    J Comp Eff Res; 2015 Sep; 4(5):465-71. PubMed ID: 26388438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparative effectiveness research in practice and policy for radiation oncology.
    Lawrence WF
    Semin Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 24314343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Young adult and parent stakeholder perspectives on participation in patient-centered comparative effectiveness research.
    Saunders T; Mackie TI; Shah S; Gooding H; de Ferranti SD; Leslie LK
    J Comp Eff Res; 2016 Aug; 5(5):487-97. PubMed ID: 27427160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Which research is needed to support clinical decision-making on integrative medicine? Can comparative effectiveness research close the gap?].
    Witt CM; Huang WJ; Lao L; Berman BM
    Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 33(8):1030-5. PubMed ID: 24325048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Consumers' understanding of and interest in provider- versus practice-level quality characteristics: findings from a focus group study.
    Smith B; Lynch WD; Markow C; Lifsey S; Slover M
    Am J Med Qual; 2015; 30(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 24755480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.