These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25494952)
1. Virtual reality lead extraction as a method for training new physicians: a pilot study. Maytin M; Daily TP; Carillo RG Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2015 Mar; 38(3):319-25. PubMed ID: 25494952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mentored simulation training improves procedural skills in cardiac catheterization: a randomized, controlled pilot study. Bagai A; O'Brien S; Al Lawati H; Goyal P; Ball W; Grantcharov T; Fam N Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Oct; 5(5):672-9. PubMed ID: 23048053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identification of skills common to renal and iliac endovascular procedures performed on a virtual reality simulator. Neequaye SK; Aggarwal R; Brightwell R; Van Herzeele I; Darzi A; Cheshire NJ Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2007 May; 33(5):525-32. PubMed ID: 17291792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Virtual reality simulation training of mastoidectomy - studies on novice performance. Andersen SA Dan Med J; 2016 Aug; 63(8):. PubMed ID: 27477803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of 2 ex vivo training curricula for advanced laparoscopic skills: a randomized controlled trial. Orzech N; Palter VN; Reznick RK; Aggarwal R; Grantcharov TP Ann Surg; 2012 May; 255(5):833-9. PubMed ID: 22504187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retention of colonoscopy skills after virtual reality simulator training by independent and proctored methods. Snyder CW; Vandromme MJ; Tyra SL; Hawn MT Am Surg; 2010 Jul; 76(7):743-6. PubMed ID: 20698383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Virtual reality ureteroscopy simulator as a valid tool for assessing endourological skills. Matsumoto ED; Pace KT; D'A Honey RJ Int J Urol; 2006 Jul; 13(7):896-901. PubMed ID: 16882051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Virtual ureteroscopy predicts ureteroscopic proficiency of medical students on a cadaver. Ogan K; Jacomides L; Shulman MJ; Roehrborn CG; Cadeddu JA; Pearle MS J Urol; 2004 Aug; 172(2):667-71. PubMed ID: 15247757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simulated colonoscopy training leads to improved performance during patient-based assessment. Koch AD; Ekkelenkamp VE; Haringsma J; Schoon EJ; de Man RA; Kuipers EJ Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Mar; 81(3):630-6. PubMed ID: 25475901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Individualized deliberate practice on a virtual reality simulator improves technical performance of surgical novices in the operating room: a randomized controlled trial. Palter VN; Grantcharov TP Ann Surg; 2014 Mar; 259(3):443-8. PubMed ID: 24503910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of virtual-reality simulator training in acquisition of competency in colonoscopy. Cohen J; Cohen SA; Vora KC; Xue X; Burdick JS; Bank S; Bini EJ; Bodenheimer H; Cerulli M; Gerdes H; Greenwald D; Gress F; Grosman I; Hawes R; Mullin G; Schnoll-Sussman F; Starpoli A; Stevens P; Tenner S; Villanueva G Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Sep; 64(3):361-8. PubMed ID: 16923483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator. Botden SM; Buzink SN; Schijven MP; Jakimowicz JJ World J Surg; 2007 Apr; 31(4):764-72. PubMed ID: 17361356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Learning curves and reliability measures for virtual reality simulation in the performance assessment of carotid angiography. Patel AD; Gallagher AG; Nicholson WJ; Cates CU J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 May; 47(9):1796-802. PubMed ID: 16682303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of a bronchoscopy simulator. Ost D; DeRosiers A; Britt EJ; Fein AM; Lesser ML; Mehta AC Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2001 Dec; 164(12):2248-55. PubMed ID: 11751195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The future of simulation technologies for complex cardiovascular procedures. Cates CU; Gallagher AG Eur Heart J; 2012 Sep; 33(17):2127-34. PubMed ID: 22733836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new virtual-reality training module for laparoscopic surgical skills and equipment handling: can multitasking be trained? A randomized controlled trial. Bongers PJ; Diederick van Hove P; Stassen LP; Dankelman J; Schreuder HW J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(2):184-91. PubMed ID: 25439179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Visuospatial and psychomotor aptitude predicts endovascular performance of inexperienced individuals on a virtual reality simulator. Van Herzeele I; O'Donoghue KG; Aggarwal R; Vermassen F; Darzi A; Cheshire NJ J Vasc Surg; 2010 Apr; 51(4):1035-42. PubMed ID: 20347702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Proving the effectiveness of virtual reality simulation for training in laparoscopic surgery. Aggarwal R; Ward J; Balasundaram I; Sains P; Athanasiou T; Darzi A Ann Surg; 2007 Nov; 246(5):771-9. PubMed ID: 17968168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Virtual reality training in coronary angiography and its transfer effect to real-life catheterisation lab. Jensen UJ; Jensen J; Ahlberg G; Tornvall P EuroIntervention; 2016 Apr; 11(13):1503-10. PubMed ID: 26547247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]