These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25495239)

  • 1. A neural reward prediction error revealed by a meta-analysis of ERPs using great grand averages.
    Sambrook TD; Goslin J
    Psychol Bull; 2015 Jan; 141(1):213-35. PubMed ID: 25495239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence for parietal reward prediction errors using great grand average meta-analysis.
    Stewardson HJ; Sambrook TD
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Jun; 152():81-86. PubMed ID: 32272127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mediofrontal event-related potentials in response to positive, negative and unsigned prediction errors.
    Sambrook TD; Goslin J
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Aug; 61():1-10. PubMed ID: 24946315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Valence-separated representation of reward prediction error in feedback-related negativity and positivity.
    Bai Y; Katahira K; Ohira H
    Neuroreport; 2015 Feb; 26(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 25634316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. It is less than you expected: the feedback-related negativity reflects violations of reward magnitude expectations.
    Bellebaum C; Polezzi D; Daum I
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Sep; 48(11):3343-50. PubMed ID: 20655319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How we learn to make decisions: rapid propagation of reinforcement learning prediction errors in humans.
    Krigolson OE; Hassall CD; Handy TC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 26(3):635-44. PubMed ID: 24168216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Principal components analysis of reward prediction errors in a reinforcement learning task.
    Sambrook TD; Goslin J
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):276-286. PubMed ID: 26196667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Learning from experience: event-related potential correlates of reward processing, neural adaptation, and behavioral choice.
    Walsh MM; Anderson JR
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2012 Sep; 36(8):1870-84. PubMed ID: 22683741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual Salience and Reward Both Influence Feedback-Related Neural Activity Arising from Choice.
    Lou B; Hsu WY; Sajda P
    J Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 35(38):13064-75. PubMed ID: 26400937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When the outcome is different than expected: Subjective expectancy shapes reward prediction error at the FRN level.
    Walentowska W; Severo MC; Moors A; Pourtois G
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Dec; 56(12):e13456. PubMed ID: 31403188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Manipulation of feedback expectancy and valence induces negative and positive reward prediction error signals manifest in event-related brain potentials.
    Pfabigan DM; Alexopoulos J; Bauer H; Sailer U
    Psychophysiology; 2011 May; 48(5):656-64. PubMed ID: 21039585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Event-related brain potentials and the study of reward processing: Methodological considerations.
    Krigolson OE
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):175-183. PubMed ID: 29154804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Feedback-related Negativity Codes Components of Abstract Inference during Reward-based Decision-making.
    Reiter AM; Koch SP; Schröger E; Hinrichs H; Heinze HJ; Deserno L; Schlagenhauf F
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 28(8):1127-38. PubMed ID: 27031567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Better or worse than expected? Aging, learning, and the ERN.
    Eppinger B; Kray J; Mock B; Mecklinger A
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(2):521-39. PubMed ID: 17936313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temporal dissociation of salience and prediction error responses to appetitive and aversive taste.
    Hird EJ; El-Deredy W; Jones A; Talmi D
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Feb; 55(2):. PubMed ID: 28833254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlation of cue-locked FRN and feedback-locked FRN in the auditory monetary incentive delay task.
    Krugliakova E; Klucharev V; Fedele T; Gorin A; Kuznetsova A; Shestakova A
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jan; 236(1):141-151. PubMed ID: 29196772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of reward magnitude on reward processing: An averaged and single trial event-related potential study.
    Meadows CC; Gable PA; Lohse KR; Miller MW
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Jul; 118():154-160. PubMed ID: 27288743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual properties of feedback stimuli influence the feedback-related negativity in the flanker gambling task.
    Liu Y; Nelson LD; Bernat EM; Gehring WJ
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Aug; 51(8):782-8. PubMed ID: 24673119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feedback timing modulates interactions between feedback processing and memory encoding: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Höltje G; Mecklinger A
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2020 Apr; 20(2):250-264. PubMed ID: 31900874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomised prior feedback modulates neural signals of outcome monitoring.
    Mushtaq F; Wilkie RM; Mon-Williams MA; Schaefer A
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 125():868-879. PubMed ID: 26497268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.