186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25495383)
1. Validity and reliability of three-dimensional imaging for measuring the volume of the arm.
Erends M; van der Aa T; de Grzymala AP; van der Hulst R
Lymphat Res Biol; 2014 Dec; 12(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 25495383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability and validity of arm volume measurements for assessment of lymphedema.
Taylor R; Jayasinghe UW; Koelmeyer L; Ung O; Boyages J
Phys Ther; 2006 Feb; 86(2):205-14. PubMed ID: 16445334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 3D stereophotogrammetry in upper-extremity lymphedema: An accurate diagnostic method.
Hameeteman M; Verhulst AC; Vreeken RD; Maal TJ; Ulrich DJ
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 Feb; 69(2):241-7. PubMed ID: 26590631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity and Reliability of Three-Dimensional Imaging for Measuring Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema in the Upper Limb: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Preuß M; Killaars R; Piatkowski de Grzymala A; Binnebösel M; Neumann U
Lymphat Res Biol; 2018 Dec; 16(6):525-532. PubMed ID: 30281382
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative comparison between the laser scanner three-dimensional method and the circumferential method for evaluation of arm volume in patients with lymphedema.
Cau N; Galli M; Cimolin V; Grossi A; Battarin I; Puleo G; Balzarini A; Caraceni A
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2018 Jan; 6(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 29248110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability and limits of agreement of circumferential, water displacement, and optoelectronic volumetry in the measurement of upper limb lymphedema.
Deltombe T; Jamart J; Recloux S; Legrand C; Vandenbroeck N; Theys S; Hanson P
Lymphology; 2007 Mar; 40(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 17539462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional camera system for measuring arm volume in women with lymphedema following breast cancer treatment.
Ohberg F; Zachrisson A; Holmner-Rocklöv Å
Lymphat Res Biol; 2014 Dec; 12(4):267-74. PubMed ID: 25495382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity and intra- and interobserver reliability of an indirect volume measurements in patients with upper extremity lymphedema.
Meijer RS; Rietman JS; Geertzen JH; Bosmans JC; Dijkstra PU
Lymphology; 2004 Sep; 37(3):127-33. PubMed ID: 15560108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability of the Inverse Water Volumetry Method to Measure the Volume of the Upper Limb.
Beek MA; te Slaa A; van der Laan L; Mulder PG; Rutten HJ; Voogd AC; Luiten EJ; Gobardhan PD
Lymphat Res Biol; 2015 Jun; 13(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 26091408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Upper-extremity volume measurements in women with lymphedema: a comparison of measurements obtained via water displacement with geometrically determined volume.
Sander AP; Hajer NM; Hemenway K; Miller AC
Phys Ther; 2002 Dec; 82(12):1201-12. PubMed ID: 12444879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of the inverse water volumetry method: A new gold standard for arm volume measurements.
Damstra RJ; Glazenburg EJ; Hop WC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Oct; 99(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 16752072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new device to measure upper limb circumferences: validity and reliability.
Devoogdt N; Lemkens H; Geraerts I; Van Nuland I; Flour M; Coremans T; Christiaens MR; Van Kampen M
Int Angiol; 2010 Oct; 29(5):401-7. PubMed ID: 20924341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vectra 3D Imaging for Quantitative Volumetric Analysis of the Upper Limb: A Feasibility Study for Tracking Outcomes of Lymphedema Treatment.
Landau MJ; Kim JS; Gould DJ; Patel KM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Jan; 141(1):80e-84e. PubMed ID: 28922322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Self-measurement of upper extremity volume in women post-breast cancer: reliability and validity study.
Mori T; Lustman A; Katz-Leurer M
Physiother Theory Pract; 2015 May; 31(4):283-7. PubMed ID: 25539094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity for the simplified water displacement instrument to measure arm lymphedema as a result of breast cancer surgery.
Sagen A; Kåresen R; Skaane P; Risberg MA
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 May; 90(5):803-9. PubMed ID: 19406300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new, effective and low-cost three-dimensional approach for the estimation of upper-limb volume.
Buffa R; Mereu E; Lussu P; Succa V; Pisanu T; Buffa F; Marini E
Sensors (Basel); 2015 May; 15(6):12342-57. PubMed ID: 26016917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of a Novel Water-Based Volumetric Device for Measuring Upper Limb Lymphedema: First Experience with Healthy Volunteers.
Wolfs JAGN; Bijkerk E; Schols RM; Keuter XHA; van der Hulst RRWJ; Qiu SS
Lymphat Res Biol; 2019 Aug; 17(4):434-439. PubMed ID: 30653398
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative study between circumferential method and laser scanner 3D method for the evaluation of arm volume in healthy subjects.
Cau N; Galli M; Cimolin V; Aranci M; Caraceni A; Balzarini A
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2016 Jan; 4(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 26946898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measurement of upper extremity volume in women after axillary dissection for breast cancer.
Megens AM; Harris SR; Kim-Sing C; McKenzie DC
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Dec; 82(12):1639-44. PubMed ID: 11733875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Concurrent validity of upper-extremity volume estimates: comparison of calculated volume derived from girth measurements and water displacement volume.
Karges JR; Mark BE; Stikeleather SJ; Worrell TW
Phys Ther; 2003 Feb; 83(2):134-45. PubMed ID: 12564949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
