184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25495865)
1. Assessment of the Ocular Response Analyzer as an Instrument for Measurement of Intraocular Pressure and Corneal Biomechanics.
Elsheikh A; Joda A; Abass A; Garway-Heath D
Curr Eye Res; 2015; 40(11):1111-9. PubMed ID: 25495865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical Evaluation of Methods to Correct Intraocular Pressure Measurements by the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, Ocular Response Analyzer, and Corvis ST Tonometer for the Effects of Corneal Stiffness Parameters.
Bao F; Huang Z; Huang J; Wang J; Deng M; Li L; Yu A; Wang Q; Elsheikh A
J Glaucoma; 2016 Jun; 25(6):510-9. PubMed ID: 26709500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer.
Kotecha A; Elsheikh A; Roberts CR; Zhu H; Garway-Heath DF
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5337-47. PubMed ID: 17122122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Influence of Corneal Biomechanical Properties on Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using a Rebound Self-tonometer.
Brown L; Foulsham W; Pronin S; Tatham AJ
J Glaucoma; 2018 Jun; 27(6):511-518. PubMed ID: 29557828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effectiveness of the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, the Dynamic Contour Tonometer, the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Corvis ST in Measuring Intraocular Pressure following FS-LASIK.
Bao F; Huang W; Zhu R; Lu N; Wang Y; Li H; Wu S; Lin H; Wang J; Zheng X; Huang J; Li Y; Wang Q; Elsheikh A
Curr Eye Res; 2020 Feb; 45(2):144-152. PubMed ID: 31869261
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intraocular pressure and biomechanical corneal properties measure by ocular response analyser in patients with primary congenital glaucoma.
Perucho-González L; Martínez de la Casa JM; Morales-Fernández L; Bañeros-Rojas P; Saenz-Francés F; García-Feijoó J
Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 94(5):e293-7. PubMed ID: 26647905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.
Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Relationship Between Corvis ST Tonometry Parameters and Ocular Response Analyzer Corneal Hysteresis.
Fujishiro T; Matsuura M; Fujino Y; Murata H; Tokumo K; Nakakura S; Kiuchi Y; Asaoka R
J Glaucoma; 2020 Jun; 29(6):479-484. PubMed ID: 32134829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of corneal structure, corneal responsiveness, and other ocular parameters on tonometric measurement of intraocular pressure.
Broman AT; Congdon NG; Bandeen-Roche K; Quigley HA
J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(7):581-8. PubMed ID: 18091174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Changes in biomechanical properties of the cornea and intraocular pressure after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis using a femtosecond laser for flap creation determined using ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Shin J; Kim TW; Park SJ; Yoon M; Lee JW
J Glaucoma; 2015 Mar; 24(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 23807345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of the ocular response analyzer as a tool for intraocular pressure measurement.
Elsheikh A; Alhasso D; Kotecha A; Garway-Heath D
J Biomech Eng; 2009 Aug; 131(8):081010. PubMed ID: 19604022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties with the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer.
Detry-Morel M; Jamart J; Pourjavan S
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011; 21(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 20853262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relationship between novel intraocular pressure measurement from Corvis ST and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
Matsuura M; Murata H; Fujino Y; Yanagisawa M; Nakao Y; Tokumo K; Nakakura S; Kiuchi Y; Asaoka R
Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 104(4):563-568. PubMed ID: 31362932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Corneal biomechanics as a function of intraocular pressure and pachymetry by dynamic infrared signal and Scheimpflug imaging analysis in normal eyes.
Huseynova T; Waring GO; Roberts C; Krueger RR; Tomita M
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Apr; 157(4):885-93. PubMed ID: 24388837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can Corneal Biomechanical Properties Explain Difference in Tonometric Measurement in Normal Eyes?
Dey A; David RL; Asokan R; George R
Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Feb; 95(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 29370019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Latanoprost treatment differentially affects intraocular pressure readings obtained with three different tonometers.
Sánchez-Barahona C; Bolívar G; Katsanos A; Teus MA
Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 97(8):e1112-e1115. PubMed ID: 31184426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure differences between an air-puff tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer.
Tranchina L; Lombardo M; Oddone F; Serrao S; Schiano Lomoriello D; Ducoli P
J Glaucoma; 2013; 22(5):416-21. PubMed ID: 22366703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modified Goldmann prism intraocular pressure measurement accuracy and correlation to corneal biomechanical metrics: multicentre randomised clinical trial.
McCafferty SJ; Tetrault K; McColgin A; Chue W; Levine J; Muller M
Br J Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 103(12):1840-1844. PubMed ID: 30796054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ICare Pro: Age Dependent Effect of Central Corneal Thickness on Intraocular Pressure in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension Patients.
Hohberger B; Sommerfeld C; Lucio M; Bergua A
Curr Eye Res; 2020 Jun; 45(6):668-674. PubMed ID: 31905299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
