These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

554 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25495926)

  • 1. Stage 1 of the meaningful use incentive program for electronic health records: a study of readiness for change in ambulatory practice settings in one integrated delivery system.
    Shea CM; Reiter KL; Weaver MA; McIntyre M; Mose J; Thornhill J; Malone R; Weiner BJ
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2014 Dec; 14():119. PubMed ID: 25495926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Associations Between Practice Characteristics and Demonstration of Stage 1 Meaningful Use for the Electronic Health Record Incentive Program.
    Shea CM; Reiter KL; Weaver MA; Thornhill J; Malone R
    N C Med J; 2015; 76(5):280-5. PubMed ID: 26946855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CDI programs support meeting meaningful use.
    Wiedemann LA
    J AHIMA; 2013 Jul; 84(7):48-9. PubMed ID: 23926872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Making sense of meaningful use stage 2: second wave or tsunami?
    Mitchell J; Waldren SE
    Fam Pract Manag; 2014; 21(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 24444619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stage 2 EHR final rule is released.
    Health Devices; 2012 Oct; 41(10):331-2. PubMed ID: 23444674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tardy EHR upgrades loom as one of many Stage 2 challenges.
    Conn J
    Mod Healthc; 2014 Feb; 44(8):22. PubMed ID: 24730151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meaningful use: a national framework for integrated telemedicine.
    Vo A; Shore J; Waugh M; Doarn CR; Richardson J; Hathaway O; Bostick E; Lippolis S; Thomas M
    Telemed J E Health; 2015 May; 21(5):355-63. PubMed ID: 25636151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analyzing stage 1 and stage 2 meaningful use differences.
    Viola A
    J AHIMA; 2012; 83(11):52-3. PubMed ID: 23210298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The current state of electronic health record (EHR) use in Oklahoma.
    Khaliq AA; Mwachofi AK; Hughes DR; Broyles RW; Wheeler D; Roswell RH
    J Okla State Med Assoc; 2013 Feb; 106(2):53-6. PubMed ID: 23620983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What's new for meaningfu l use stage 2?
    McBride M
    Med Econ; 2013 Jan; 90(1):30-2, 34-5. PubMed ID: 23898589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electronic health record systems and intent to apply for meaningful use incentives among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001-2011.
    Hsiao CJ; Hing E; Socey TC; Cai B
    NCHS Data Brief; 2011 Nov; (79):1-8. PubMed ID: 22617322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The wave As federal EHR incentives recede, the next surge in health IT spending begins to take shape.
    Conn J
    Mod Healthc; 2013 May; 43(20):6-7, 1. PubMed ID: 23947264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Practice Impact of Electronic Health Record System Implementation Within a Large Multispecialty Ophthalmic Practice.
    Singh RP; Bedi R; Li A; Kulkarni S; Rodstrom T; Altus G; Martin DF
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Jun; 133(6):668-74. PubMed ID: 25880083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Persuading the leopards to change their spots.
    Illman J
    Health Serv J; 2013 Oct; 123(6369):26-9. PubMed ID: 24383190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Most physicians were eligible for federal incentives in 2011, but few had EHR systems that met meaningful-use criteria.
    Hsiao CJ; Decker SL; Hing E; Sisk JE
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2012 May; 31(5):1100-7. PubMed ID: 22535501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Provider perceptions of the electronic health record incentive programs: a survey of eligible professionals who have and have not attested to meaningful use.
    Weeks DL; Keeney BJ; Evans PC; Moore QD; Conrad DA
    J Gen Intern Med; 2015 Jan; 30(1):123-30. PubMed ID: 25164087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variation in electronic health record adoption and readiness for meaningful use: 2008-2011.
    Patel V; Jamoom E; Hsiao CJ; Furukawa MF; Buntin M
    J Gen Intern Med; 2013 Jul; 28(7):957-64. PubMed ID: 23371416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Documenting the disruption.
    Verdon DR
    Med Econ; 2012 Jun; 89(12):44-6, 48. PubMed ID: 24383204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adoption and use of electronic health records among federally qualified health centers grew substantially during 2010-12.
    Jones EB; Furukawa MF
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2014 Jul; 33(7):1254-61. PubMed ID: 25006154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Only credentialed medical assistants can enter EHR orders.
    Lewis M
    Med Econ; 2014 Mar; 91(5):40. PubMed ID: 25137908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.