These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25496088)

  • 1. Predictive validity of the Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability for violent behavior in outpatient forensic psychiatric patients.
    Troquete NA; van den Brink RH; Beintema H; Mulder T; van Os TW; Schoevers RA; Wiersma D
    Psychol Assess; 2015 Jun; 27(2):377-91. PubMed ID: 25496088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The short- to medium-term predictive accuracy of static and dynamic risk assessment measures in a secure forensic hospital.
    Chu CM; Thomas SD; Ogloff JR; Daffern M
    Assessment; 2013 Apr; 20(2):230-41. PubMed ID: 21856718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Routine violence risk assessment in community forensic mental healthcare.
    van den Brink RH; Hooijschuur A; van Os TW; Savenije W; Wiersma D
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(3):396-410. PubMed ID: 19908211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of risk assessment instruments to predict violence in forensic psychiatric hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ramesh T; Igoumenou A; Vazquez Montes M; Fazel S
    Eur Psychiatry; 2018 Aug; 52():47-53. PubMed ID: 29626758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The utility of the Historical Clinical Risk-20 Scale as a predictor of outcomes in decisions to transfer patients from high to lower levels of security--a UK perspective.
    Dolan M; Blattner R
    BMC Psychiatry; 2010 Sep; 10():76. PubMed ID: 20920217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Should clinicians use average or peak scores on a dynamic risk-assessment measure to most accurately predict inpatient aggression?
    Chu CM; Thomas SD; Daffern M; Ogloff JR
    Int J Ment Health Nurs; 2013 Dec; 22(6):493-9. PubMed ID: 23211005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk assessment by client and case manager for shared decision making in outpatient forensic psychiatry.
    van den Brink RH; Troquete NA; Beintema H; Mulder T; van Os TW; Schoevers RA; Wiersma D
    BMC Psychiatry; 2015 May; 15():120. PubMed ID: 26012536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using dynamic risk and protective factors to predict inpatient aggression: reliability and validity of START assessments.
    Desmarais SL; Nicholls TL; Wilson CM; Brink J
    Psychol Assess; 2012 Sep; 24(3):685-700. PubMed ID: 22250595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inpatient violence in forensic psychiatry: Does change in dynamic risk indicators of the IFTE help predict short term inpatient violence?
    Schuringa E; Spreen M; Bogaerts S
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 66():101448. PubMed ID: 31706381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictors of violent behavior among acute psychiatric patients: clinical study.
    Amore M; Menchetti M; Tonti C; Scarlatti F; Lundgren E; Esposito W; Berardi D
    Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2008 Jun; 62(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 18588583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictive validity of the structured assessment of violence risk in youth: A 4-year follow-up.
    Gammelgård M; Koivisto AM; Eronen M; Kaltiala-Heino R
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2015 Jul; 25(3):192-206. PubMed ID: 25042997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Forensic assessment of violence risk].
    Pujol Robinat A; Mohíno Justes S; Gómez-Durán EL
    Med Clin (Barc); 2014 Mar; 142 Suppl 2():16-23. PubMed ID: 24913749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictive validity of the SVR-20 and Static-99 in a Dutch sample of treated sex offenders.
    de Vogel V; de Ruiter C; van Beek D; Mead G
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Jun; 28(3):235-51. PubMed ID: 15264445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk assessment and shared care planning in out-patient forensic psychiatry: cluster randomised controlled trial.
    Troquete NA; van den Brink RH; Beintema H; Mulder T; van Os TW; Schoevers RA; Wiersma D
    Br J Psychiatry; 2013 May; 202(5):365-71. PubMed ID: 23520222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predictors of Mental Health Review Tribunal (MHRT) outcome in a forensic inpatient population: a prospective cohort study.
    Jewell A; Dean K; Fahy T; Cullen AE
    BMC Psychiatry; 2017 Jan; 17(1):25. PubMed ID: 28095806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Specific outpatient treatment for forensic patients after release].
    Butz M; Mokros A; Osterheider M
    Psychiatr Prax; 2013 Jan; 40(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 23319282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictive accuracy of the Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20 for violence in forensic psychiatric wards in Japan.
    Arai K; Takano A; Nagata T; Hirabayashi N
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2017 Dec; 27(5):409-420. PubMed ID: 27296667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) during residential treatment.
    Lodewijks HP; Doreleijers TA; de Ruiter C; Borum R
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(3):263-71. PubMed ID: 18508122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictive validity of dynamic factors: assessing violence risk in forensic psychiatric inpatients.
    Wilson CM; Desmarais SL; Nicholls TL; Hart SD; Brink J
    Law Hum Behav; 2013 Dec; 37(6):377-88. PubMed ID: 23815092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Susceptibility (risk and protective) factors for in-patient violence and self-harm: prospective study of structured professional judgement instruments START and SAPROF, DUNDRUM-3 and DUNDRUM-4 in forensic mental health services.
    Abidin Z; Davoren M; Naughton L; Gibbons O; Nulty A; Kennedy HG
    BMC Psychiatry; 2013 Jul; 13():197. PubMed ID: 23890106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.