These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25497520)

  • 1. Pigeons acquire multiple categories in parallel via associative learning: a parallel to human word learning?
    Wasserman EA; Brooks DI; McMurray B
    Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():99-122. PubMed ID: 25497520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pigeons exhibit flexibility but not rule formation in dimensional learning, stimulus generalization, and task switching.
    O'Donoghue EM; Broschard MB; Wasserman EA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(2):107-123. PubMed ID: 31916780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A category-overshadowing effect in pigeons: support for the Common Elements Model of object categorization learning.
    Soto FA; Wasserman EA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Jul; 38(3):322-8. PubMed ID: 22823423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conceptualization in pigeons: The evolution of a paradigm.
    Wasserman EA
    Behav Processes; 2016 Feb; 123():4-14. PubMed ID: 26424489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Learning in rich networks involves both positive and negative associations.
    Roembke TC; Wasserman EA; McMurray B
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Aug; 145(8):1062-74. PubMed ID: 27336324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. View-invariance learning in object recognition by pigeons depends on error-driven associative learning processes.
    Soto FA; Siow JY; Wasserman EA
    Vision Res; 2012 Jun; 62():148-61. PubMed ID: 22531015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanisms of object recognition: what we have learned from pigeons.
    Soto FA; Wasserman EA
    Front Neural Circuits; 2014; 8():122. PubMed ID: 25352784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The learning of basic-level categories by pigeons: the prototype effect, attention, and effects of categorization.
    Jitsumori M; Ohkita M; Ushitani T
    Learn Behav; 2011 Sep; 39(3):271-87. PubMed ID: 21484235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The neuroscience of perceptual categorization in pigeons: A mechanistic hypothesis.
    Güntürkün O; Koenen C; Iovine F; Garland A; Pusch R
    Learn Behav; 2018 Sep; 46(3):229-241. PubMed ID: 29532328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scene gist categorization by pigeons.
    Kirkpatrick K; Bilton T; Hansen BC; Loschky LC
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2014 Apr; 40(2):162-77. PubMed ID: 24364667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pigeons' tracking of relevant attributes in categorization learning.
    Castro L; Wasserman EA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2014 Apr; 40(2):195-211. PubMed ID: 24893218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conditional same-different discrimination by pigeons: acquisition and generalization to novel and few-item displays.
    Castro L; Kennedy PL; Wasserman EA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Jan; 36(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 20141315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feature predictiveness and selective attention in pigeons' categorization learning.
    Castro L; Wasserman EA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(3):231-242. PubMed ID: 29120213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Concurrent identity training is not necessary for associative symmetry in successive matching.
    Campos HC; Urcuioli PJ; Swisher M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Jan; 101(1):10-25. PubMed ID: 24436073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Learning During Processing: Word Learning Doesn't Wait for Word Recognition to Finish.
    Apfelbaum KS; McMurray B
    Cogn Sci; 2017 Apr; 41 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):706-747. PubMed ID: 27471082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transfer between local and global processing levels by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens) in exemplar- and rule-based categorization tasks.
    Aust U; Braunöder E
    J Comp Psychol; 2015 Feb; 129(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 25150965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Velocity-based motion categorization by pigeons.
    Cook RG; Beale K; Koban A
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Apr; 37(2):175-88. PubMed ID: 21517199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Failure to find evidence of stimulus generalization within pictorial categories in pigeons.
    Sutton JE; Roberts WA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Nov; 78(3):333-43. PubMed ID: 12507007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pigeon category learning: Revisiting the Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961) tasks.
    Navarro VM; Jani R; Wasserman EA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(2):174-184. PubMed ID: 30869935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pigeons' categorization may be exclusively nonanalytic.
    Smith JD; Ashby FG; Berg ME; Murphy MS; Spiering B; Cook RG; Grace RC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Apr; 18(2):414-21. PubMed ID: 21327382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.