BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25498052)

  • 1. Can stroke volume variation be an alternative to central venous pressure in patients undergoing kidney transplantation?
    Chin JH; Jun IG; Lee J; Seo H; Hwang GS; Kim YK
    Transplant Proc; 2014 Dec; 46(10):3363-6. PubMed ID: 25498052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative study of pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation and central venous pressure in patients undergoing kidney transplantation.
    Kim KM; Kim GS; Han M
    Singapore Med J; 2022 Dec; 63(12):731-739. PubMed ID: 34911180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The comparison between stroke volume variation and filling pressure as an estimate of right ventricular preload in patients undergoing renal transplantation.
    Toyoda D; Fukuda M; Iwasaki R; Terada T; Sato N; Ochiai R; Kotake Y
    J Anesth; 2015 Feb; 29(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 24962946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [A prospective clinical study of pleth variability index in prediction of volume responsiveness in patients with septic shock].
    Lu N; Zheng R; Lin H; Yu J; Shao J; Wu X; Wang H
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2015 Jan; 27(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 25591431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness by Stroke Volume Variation in Children Undergoing Fontan Operation.
    Song Y; Hou H; Bai J; Gu H
    Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():2595960. PubMed ID: 33224977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Utility of uncalibrated femoral stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness during the anhepatic phase of liver transplantation.
    Shin YH; Ko JS; Gwak MS; Kim GS; Lee JH; Lee SK
    Liver Transpl; 2011 Jan; 17(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 21254345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Variability of peripheral arterial peak velocity predicts fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock].
    Lu N; Jiang L; Zhu B; Han W; Zhao Y; Shi Y; Guo F; Xi X
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2018 Mar; 30(3):224-229. PubMed ID: 29519280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Central venous pressure as an adjunct to flow-guided volume optimisation after induction of general anaesthesia.
    Hahn RG; He R; Li Y
    Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther; 2016; 48(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 26499516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in infants and neonates undergoing congenital heart surgery.
    Renner J; Broch O; Duetschke P; Scheewe J; Höcker J; Moseby M; Jung O; Bein B
    Br J Anaesth; 2012 Jan; 108(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 22113930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Hofer CK; Müller SM; Furrer L; Klaghofer R; Genoni M; Zollinger A
    Chest; 2005 Aug; 128(2):848-54. PubMed ID: 16100177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is stroke volume variation a useful preload index in liver transplant recipients? A retrospective analysis.
    Kim SH; Hwang GS; Kim SO; Kim YK
    Int J Med Sci; 2013; 10(6):751-7. PubMed ID: 23630440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stroke volume variation fail to predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy with one-lung ventilation using thoracotomy.
    Fu Q; Zhao F; Mi W; Zhang H
    Biosci Trends; 2014 Feb; 8(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 24647114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [An evaluation of stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated elderly patients with severe sepsis].
    Yu YH; Dai HW; Yan ML; Gong SJ; Cai GL; Zhang ZC; Chen J; Yan J
    Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2009 Aug; 21(8):463-5. PubMed ID: 19695166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stroke Volume Variation-Guided Versus Central Venous Pressure-Guided Low Central Venous Pressure With Milrinone During Living Donor Hepatectomy: A Randomized Double-Blinded Clinical Trial.
    Lee J; Kim WH; Ryu HG; Lee HC; Chung EJ; Yang SM; Jung CW
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Aug; 125(2):423-430. PubMed ID: 28632543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions.
    de Waal EE; Rex S; Kruitwagen CL; Kalkman CJ; Buhre WF
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):510-5. PubMed ID: 19114886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Alternative methods to central venous pressure for assessing volume status in critically ill patients.
    Stoneking L; Deluca LA; Fiorello AB; Munzer B; Baker N; Denninghoff KR
    J Emerg Nurs; 2014 Mar; 40(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 23089635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Positive end-expiratory pressure-induced increase in external jugular venous pressure does not predict fluid responsiveness in laparoscopic prostatectomy.
    Hur M; Yoo S; Choi JY; Park SK; Jung DE; Kim WH; Kim JT; Bahk JH
    J Anesth; 2018 Jun; 32(3):316-325. PubMed ID: 29488025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stroke volume variation in hepatic resection: a replacement for standard central venous pressure monitoring.
    Dunki-Jacobs EM; Philips P; Scoggins CR; McMasters KM; Martin RC
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Feb; 21(2):473-8. PubMed ID: 24150192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Observations on significant hemodynamic changes caused by a high concentration of epidurally administered ropivacaine: correlation and prediction study of stroke volume variation and central venous pressure in thoracic epidural anesthesia.
    Hong JM; Lee HJ; Oh YJ; Cho AR; Kim HJ; Lee DW; Do WS; Kwon JY; Kim H
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Nov; 17(1):153. PubMed ID: 29145824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation are good predictors of fluid responsiveness in sepsis patients].
    Drvar Z; Pavlek M; Drvar V; Tomasević B; Baronica R; Perić M
    Acta Med Croatica; 2013 Dec; 67(5):407-14. PubMed ID: 24979881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.