315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25498271)
1. How many cores should be taken in a repeat biopsy on patients in whom atypical small acinar proliferation has been identified in an initial transrectal prostate biopsy?
Aglamis E; Kocaarslan R; Yucetas U; Toktas G; Ceylan C; Doluoglu OG; Unluer E
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(5):605-12. PubMed ID: 25498271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) on extended prostatic biopsies: predictive factors of cancer detection on repeat biopsies.
Scattoni V; Roscigno M; Freschi M; Dehò F; Raber M; Briganti A; Fantini G; Nava L; Montorsi F; Rigatti P
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2005 Mar; 77(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 15906787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The incidence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical glands suspicious for carcinoma on first-time saturation needle biopsy, and the subsequent risk of cancer.
Schoenfield L; Jones JS; Zippe CD; Reuther AM; Klein E; Zhou M; Magi-Galluzzi C
BJU Int; 2007 Apr; 99(4):770-4. PubMed ID: 17233800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative performance analysis of total prostate-specific antigen, percentage free prostate-specific antigen, prostate-specific antigen velocity and urinary prostate cancer gene 3 in the first, second and third repeat prostate biopsy.
Auprich M; Augustin H; Budäus L; Kluth L; Mannweiler S; Shariat SF; Fisch M; Graefen M; Pummer K; Chun FK
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(11):1627-35. PubMed ID: 21939492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic significance of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical small acinar proliferation in the contemporary era.
Moore CK; Karikehalli S; Nazeer T; Fisher HA; Kaufman RP; Mian BM
J Urol; 2005 Jan; 173(1):70-2. PubMed ID: 15592031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is race a positive predictor of cancer on repeat prostate biopsy?
Yanke BV; Salzhauer EW; Colon I
J Urol; 2006 Sep; 176(3):1114-7. PubMed ID: 16890704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnosis of isolated high-grade prostatic intra-epithelial neoplasia: proposal of a nomogram for the prediction of cancer detection at saturation re-biopsy.
Roscigno M; Scattoni V; Freschi M; Abdollah F; Maccagnano C; Galosi A; Lacetera V; Montironi R; Muzzonigro G; Deho F; Deiana G; Belussi D; Chinaglia D; Montorsi F; Da Pozzo LF
BJU Int; 2012 May; 109(9):1329-34. PubMed ID: 21895935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The optimal rebiopsy prostatic scheme depends on patient clinical characteristics: results of a recursive partitioning analysis based on a 24-core systematic scheme.
Scattoni V; Raber M; Capitanio U; Abdollah F; Roscigno M; Angiolilli D; Maccagnano C; Gallina A; Saccà A; Freschi M; Doglioni C; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
Eur Urol; 2011 Oct; 60(4):834-41. PubMed ID: 21820797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Length of prostate biopsy cores: does it impact cancer detection?
Fiset PO; Aprikian A; Brimo F
Can J Urol; 2013 Aug; 20(4):6848-53. PubMed ID: 23930611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prostate cancers diagnosed at repeat biopsy are smaller and less likely to be high grade.
Tan N; Lane BR; Li J; Moussa AS; Soriano M; Jones JS
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1325-9; discussion 1329. PubMed ID: 18707706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictors of prostate cancer on extended biopsy in patients with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: a multivariate analysis model.
Abdel-Khalek M; El-Baz M; Ibrahiem el-H
BJU Int; 2004 Sep; 94(4):528-33. PubMed ID: 15329106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Initial diagnosis of insignificant cancer, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, atypical small acinar proliferation, and negative have the same rate of upgrade to a Gleason score of 7 or higher on repeat prostate biopsy.
Prathibha S; Goyal KG; Zynger DL
Hum Pathol; 2018 Sep; 79():116-121. PubMed ID: 29803813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Repeat biopsy strategy in patients with atypical small acinar proliferation or high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on initial prostate needle biopsy.
Borboroglu PG; Sur RL; Roberts JL; Amling CL
J Urol; 2001 Sep; 166(3):866-70. PubMed ID: 11490235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia with adjacent small atypical glands on prostate biopsy.
Kronz JD; Shaikh AA; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2001 Apr; 32(4):389-95. PubMed ID: 11331955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP): Is a repeat biopsy necessary ASAP? A multi-institutional review.
Leone A; Gershman B; Rotker K; Butler C; Fantasia J; Miller A; Afiadata A; Amin A; Zhou A; Jiang Z; Sebo T; Mega A; Schiff S; Pareek G; Golijanin D; Yates J; Karnes RJ; Renzulli J
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2016 Mar; 19(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 26857145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate cancer detection in men with an initial diagnosis of atypical small acinar proliferation.
Mancuso PA; Chabert C; Chin P; Kovac P; Skyring T; Watt WH; Napaki S
BJU Int; 2007 Jan; 99(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 17227491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictors of prostate cancer after initial diagnosis of atypical small acinar proliferation at 10 to 12 core biopsies.
Scattoni V; Roscigno M; Freschi M; Briganti A; Fantini GV; Bertini R; Salonia A; Montorsi F; Rigatti P
Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5):1043-7. PubMed ID: 16286121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Atypical small acinar proliferation: biopsy artefact or distinct pathological entity?
Flury SC; Galgano MT; Mills SE; Smolkin ME; Theodorescu D
BJU Int; 2007 Apr; 99(4):780-5. PubMed ID: 17378841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Type of transrectal ultrasonography probe influences prostate cancer detection rates on repeat prostate biopsy.
Ching CB; Zaytoun O; Moussa AS; Li J; Avallone A; Jones JS
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2 Pt 2):E46-9. PubMed ID: 22044501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Initial extended transrectal prostate biopsy--are more prostate cancers detected with 18 cores than with 12 cores?
Scattoni V; Roscigno M; Raber M; Dehò F; Maga T; Zanoni M; Riva M; Sangalli M; Nava L; Mazzoccoli B; Freschi M; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
J Urol; 2008 Apr; 179(4):1327-31; discussion 1331. PubMed ID: 18289580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
