254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25498534)
1. Comparison of refractive assessment by wavefront aberrometry, autorefraction, and subjective refraction.
Bennett JR; Stalboerger GM; Hodge DO; Schornack MM
J Optom; 2015; 8(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 25498534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy, repeatability, and clinical application of spherocylindrical automated refraction using time-based wavefront aberrometry measurements.
Nissman SA; Tractenberg RE; Saba CM; Douglas JC; Lustbader JM
Ophthalmology; 2006 Apr; 113(4):577.e1-2. PubMed ID: 16527354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of a traditional and wavefront autorefraction.
Lebow KA; Campbell CE
Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 91(10):1191-8. PubMed ID: 25198541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of an Affordable Handheld Wavefront Autorefractor.
Rubio M; Hernández CS; Seco E; Perez-Merino P; Casares I; Dave SR; Lim D; Durr NJ; Lage E
Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Oct; 96(10):726-732. PubMed ID: 31592955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the auto-refraction function of the Nidek OPD-Scan III.
McGinnigle S; Naroo SA; Eperjesi F
Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Mar; 97(2):160-3. PubMed ID: 24024877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical Accuracy of the Nidek ARK-1 Autorefractor.
Paudel N; Adhikari S; Thakur A; Shrestha B; Loughman J
Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Jun; 96(6):407-413. PubMed ID: 31107837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of a simple-to-use, affordable, portable, wavefront aberrometry-based auto refractometer in the adult population: A prospective study.
Rao DP; Negiloni K; Gurunathan S; Velkumar S; Sivaraman A; Baig AU; Kumari B; Murali K
BMC Ophthalmol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):498. PubMed ID: 36536321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Repeatability of internal aberrometry with a new simultaneous capture aberrometer/corneal topographer.
Gifford P; Swarbrick HA
Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Jun; 89(6):929-38. PubMed ID: 22543999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Objective and subjective preoperative refraction techniques for wavefront-optimized and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.
Perez-Straziota CE; Randleman JB; Stulting RD
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Feb; 35(2):256-9. PubMed ID: 19185239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Agreement and variability of subjective refraction, autorefraction, and wavefront aberrometry in pseudophakic patients.
Ruiss M; Findl O; Draschl P; Harrer-Seely A; Hirnschall N
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2021 Aug; 47(8):1056-1063. PubMed ID: 34292891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assesment of the QuickSee wavefront autorefractor for characterizing refractive errors in school-age children.
Gil A; Hernández CS; Pérez-Merino P; Rubio M; Velarde G; Abellanas-Lodares M; Román-Daza Á; Alejandre N; Jiménez-Alfaro I; Casares I; Dave SR; Lim D; Lage E
PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0240933. PubMed ID: 33112912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of the Hand-held Wavefront Aberrometer in Measurement of Refractive Error.
Han JY; Yoon S; Brown NS; Han SH; Han J
Korean J Ophthalmol; 2020 Jun; 34(3):227-234. PubMed ID: 32495531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction.
Pesudovs K; Parker KE; Cheng H; Applegate RA
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May; 84(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 17502821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of refractive error measures by the IRX3 aberrometer and autorefraction.
McCullough SJ; Little JA; Breslin KM; Saunders KJ
Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 91(10):1183-90. PubMed ID: 25192432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Investigation of the Accuracy of a Low-Cost, Portable Autorefractor to Provide Well-Tolerated Eyeglass Prescriptions: A Randomized Crossover Trial.
Joseph S; Varadaraj V; Dave SR; Lage E; Lim D; Aziz K; Dudgeon S; Ravilla TD; Friedman DS
Ophthalmology; 2021 Dec; 128(12):1672-1680. PubMed ID: 34111444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between wavefront-derived refraction and auto-refraction.
Yakar K; Kan E; Duran M
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2023 Dec; 44():103712. PubMed ID: 37459941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of isofocal intraocular lenses on objective refraction based on autorefraction and aberrometry.
Pérez-Sanz L; Charbel C; Poyales F; Garzón N
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2023 Oct; 261(10):2863-2872. PubMed ID: 37171601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the VISX wavescan and OPD-scan III with the subjective refraction.
Zhu R; Long KL; Wu XM; Li QD
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2016 Jul; 20(14):2988-92. PubMed ID: 27460724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of manifest refraction using machine learning ensemble models on wavefront aberrometry data.
Hernández CS; Gil A; Casares I; Poderoso J; Wehse A; Dave SR; Lim D; Sánchez-Montañés M; Lage E
J Optom; 2022; 15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S22-S31. PubMed ID: 35431181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing the relative peripheral refraction effect of single vision and multifocal contact lenses measured using an autorefractor and an aberrometer: A pilot study.
Bakaraju RC; Fedtke C; Ehrmann K; Ho A
J Optom; 2015; 8(3):206-18. PubMed ID: 25662364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
