These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25498534)

  • 21. Aberrometry Repeatability and Agreement with Autorefraction.
    Nguyen MT; Berntsen DA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Sep; 94(9):886-893. PubMed ID: 28727613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accuracy of a low-cost, portable, refractive error estimation device: Results of a diagnostic accuracy trial.
    Joseph S; Sundar B; Rashme VL; Venkatachalam S; Ehrlich JR; Ravilla T
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0272451. PubMed ID: 35921350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy of autorefraction in an adult Indian population.
    Kumar RS; Moe CA; Kumar D; Rackenchath MV; A V SD; Nagaraj S; Wittberg DM; Stamper RL; Keenan JD
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251583. PubMed ID: 34010350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of higher order aberrations measured by NIDEK OPD-Scan dynamic skiascopy and Zeiss WASCA Hartmann-Shack aberrometers.
    Cerviño A; Hosking SL; Montés-Micó R
    J Refract Surg; 2008 Oct; 24(8):790-6. PubMed ID: 18856232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Design and Clinical Evaluation of a Handheld Wavefront Autorefractor.
    Durr NJ; Dave SR; Vera-Diaz FA; Lim D; Dorronsoro C; Marcos S; Thorn F; Lage E
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Dec; 92(12):1140-7. PubMed ID: 26580271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of a Portable Wavefront Aberrometer for Community Screening Refraction in the Elderly.
    Plum W; Varadaraj V; Dosto N; Thompson SL; Gajwani P; Friedman DS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2021 Mar; 98(3):289-294. PubMed ID: 33633020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluating refraction and visual acuity with the Nidek autorefractometer AR-360A in a randomized population-based screening study.
    Stoor K; Karvonen E; Liinamaa J; Saarela V
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 96(4):384-389. PubMed ID: 29193822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of the SVOne: A Handheld, Smartphone-Based Autorefractor.
    Ciuffreda KJ; Rosenfield M
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Dec; 92(12):1133-9. PubMed ID: 26540478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An alternative clinical routine for subjective refraction based on power vectors with trial frames.
    María Revert A; Conversa MA; Albarrán Diego C; Micó V
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jan; 37(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 28030877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Autorefraction as an outcome measure of laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Pesudovs K
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Sep; 30(9):1921-8. PubMed ID: 15342056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A Comparison Between Refraction From an Adaptive Optics Visual Simulator and Clinical Refractions.
    Tabernero J; Otero C; Pardhan S
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2020 Jun; 9(7):23. PubMed ID: 32832229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of monochromatic aberrations in young adults with different visual acuity and refractive errors.
    Yazar S; Hewitt AW; Forward H; McKnight CM; Tan A; Mountain JA; Mackey DA
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Mar; 40(3):441-9. PubMed ID: 24417894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of the VISX wavescan and NIDEK OPD-scan aberrometers.
    Kim DS; Narváez J; Krassin J; Bahjri K
    J Refract Surg; 2009 May; 25(5):429-34. PubMed ID: 19507795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of the SVOne Handheld Autorefractor in a Pediatric Population.
    Rosenfield M; Ciuffreda KJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Feb; 94(2):159-165. PubMed ID: 27668640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Eccentric small-zone ray tracing wavefront aberrometry for refraction in keratoconus.
    Fredriksson A; Behndig A
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Nov; 94(7):679-684. PubMed ID: 27496244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Advancing Digital Workflows for Refractive Error Measurements.
    Ohlendorf A; Leube A; Wahl S
    J Clin Med; 2020 Jul; 9(7):. PubMed ID: 32664689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical Evaluation Of a 0.05 D-step Binocular Wavefront Optometer in Young Adults in China.
    Cheng M; Chen X; Lei Y; Li B; Jiang Y; Xu Y; Zhou X; Wang X
    Clin Exp Optom; 2024 May; 107(4):395-401. PubMed ID: 36794379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison between subjective refraction and aberrometry-derived refraction in keratoconus patients and control subjects.
    Jinabhai A; O'Donnell C; Radhakrishnan H
    Curr Eye Res; 2010 Aug; 35(8):703-14. PubMed ID: 20673047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Validation of aberrometry-based relative peripheral refraction measurements.
    Berntsen DA; Mutti DO; Zadnik K
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jan; 28(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 18201339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Repeatability and validity of the PowerRefractor and the Nidek AR600-A in an adult population with healthy eyes.
    Allen PM; Radhakrishnan H; O'Leary DJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Mar; 80(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 12637836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.